Richie Woodhall
Richie Woodhall
I think I might be the only person that dislikes him as a commentator. I don't know what it is exactly about his style of commentary but I'm not a huge fan. I'm curious to whether there's any other folk that aren't that keen on him?
-
David McAllister
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 05:27
Re: Richie Woodhall
I agree, he makes things sound far too complicated for the casual fans i.e. bent arm shot ![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Richie Woodhall
Bent arm shot is too complicated?
I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
Re: Richie Woodhall
'Furious fusilade of punches!' was my favourite Ron-ism from today's sessionCounter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?
I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4733
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Richie Woodhall
Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?
I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
I don't mind Woodhall at all, in fact I think he's quite good.
Re: Richie Woodhall
Woodhall is one of the good ones IMO, he gets it right most of the time when a boxer needs to do something he is usually on the ball with the correct tactic. he has excellent experience in the amateur game as well as he has been there and done it, very knowledgeable 
Re: Richie Woodhall
Most knowledgable analyst there is. Superb.
-
David McAllister
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 05:27
Re: Richie Woodhall
Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?
I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
That was just the first one that came to mind, why can't he just call it a hook? It's the same when he starts going on about a boxer moving from phase 1 through 3, that doesn't mean anything to the typical guy turning over to watch boxing because its the Olympics.
Don't get me wrong I know Ritchie knows his stuff and is a good coach but when he is commentating I just think he would sound better just using more common phrases that a casual fan can understand.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Richie Woodhall
"I thought that was a split round my self"....errrr....
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Richie Woodhall
Makes perfect sense, a round where you don't expect unanimity from the judgesBoxing Prospect wrote:"I thought that was a split round my self"....errrr....
Re: Richie Woodhall
How many times have McIntosh and Woodhall said "the man in blue/red" over the course of these games?

-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3156
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Richie Woodhall
The man in blue has a solid look about him.
Re: Richie Woodhall
he doesnt want to sound too complicated to the casual fan tho does he? woodhall is the best british commentator around imoElJefe wrote:How many times have McIntosh and Woodhall said "the man in blue/red" over the course of these games?![]()
Re: Richie Woodhall
Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?
I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Richie Woodhall
Dixonian wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?
I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
Serpentine meanderings... I bet McIntosh has crowbarred that phrase into one of his commentaries.
only when the purposive perambulations of his narrative took on a more speculative purview, placing him firmly in the pantheon of presenting paragons
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13266
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Richie Woodhall
The judges are split over that round ..and you can't argue with that....well actually you can..
Re: Richie Woodhall
Davie's a fan!
Richie sounds knowledgeable without trying to be overly dramatic or controversial
Richie sounds knowledgeable without trying to be overly dramatic or controversial
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45229
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Richie Woodhall
He probably use an actual crowbar as a toothpick.Dixonian wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?
I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
Serpentine meanderings... I bet McIntosh has crowbarred that phrase into one of his commentaries.
Re: Richie Woodhall
Bring back Jim Neilly. I miss his commentary..... a lot.
Re: Richie Woodhall
I don't mind him, for the most part.
He says what he thinks, and doesn't suck up to whatever the channel wants to him to say.
He says what he thinks, and doesn't suck up to whatever the channel wants to him to say.
-
ScottDetonator
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33
Re: Richie Woodhall
I prefer Richie's commentary more than just about anyone else, to be honest.
I like how he reads a fight and doesn't sugar coat his thoughts.
I'd be perfectly happy to see Richie on every Sky broadcast but I don't think he would be the 'man' for them.
I like how he reads a fight and doesn't sugar coat his thoughts.
I'd be perfectly happy to see Richie on every Sky broadcast but I don't think he would be the 'man' for them.
-
Stevieb8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Richie Woodhall
I don't no why audley always gets overlooked when it comes to punditry. He is articulate and knowledgeable. Yet he always gets overlooked for the likes of Amir khan who can barely string a sentence together. Plus, he's one of our most successful amateurs.
Re: Richie Woodhall
I prefer Barry Jones to Richie Woodhall .....
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32865
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Richie Woodhall
Yeah I always thought Audley would be an excellent pundit. Maybe he just doesn't fancy it though, as I can't remember him ever even properly attempting it.Stevieb8006 wrote:I don't no why audley always gets overlooked when it comes to punditry. He is articulate and knowledgeable. Yet he always gets overlooked for the likes of Amir khan who can barely string a sentence together. Plus, he's one of our most successful amateurs.