Richie Woodhall

lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Richie Woodhall

Post by lefty »

I think I might be the only person that dislikes him as a commentator. I don't know what it is exactly about his style of commentary but I'm not a huge fan. I'm curious to whether there's any other folk that aren't that keen on him?
David McAllister
Super Middleweight
Posts: 445
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 05:27

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by David McAllister »

I agree, he makes things sound far too complicated for the casual fans i.e. bent arm shot :witzend:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Counter-puncher »

Bent arm shot is too complicated?

I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
arlovski
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 249
Joined: 26 Apr 2009, 17:08

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by arlovski »

Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?

I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
'Furious fusilade of punches!' was my favourite Ron-ism from today's session
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4733
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?

I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!
:lol: that man can waffle! Never a slither of dead air around when big Ron is on the mic.

I don't mind Woodhall at all, in fact I think he's quite good.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Rexob »

Woodhall is one of the good ones IMO, he gets it right most of the time when a boxer needs to do something he is usually on the ball with the correct tactic. he has excellent experience in the amateur game as well as he has been there and done it, very knowledgeable :TU:
Supremo
Super Middleweight
Posts: 698
Joined: 12 May 2013, 04:46

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Supremo »

Most knowledgable analyst there is. Superb.
David McAllister
Super Middleweight
Posts: 445
Joined: 09 Feb 2013, 05:27

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by David McAllister »

Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?

I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!

That was just the first one that came to mind, why can't he just call it a hook? It's the same when he starts going on about a boxer moving from phase 1 through 3, that doesn't mean anything to the typical guy turning over to watch boxing because its the Olympics.

Don't get me wrong I know Ritchie knows his stuff and is a good coach but when he is commentating I just think he would sound better just using more common phrases that a casual fan can understand.
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Boxing Prospect »

"I thought that was a split round my self"....errrr....
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Counter-puncher »

Boxing Prospect wrote:"I thought that was a split round my self"....errrr....
Makes perfect sense, a round where you don't expect unanimity from the judges
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by ElJefe »

How many times have McIntosh and Woodhall said "the man in blue/red" over the course of these games? :brick: :lol:
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3156
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Grilling Machine »

The man in blue has a solid look about him.
TheGman
Middleweight
Posts: 8964
Joined: 10 Oct 2013, 12:37

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by TheGman »

ElJefe wrote:How many times have McIntosh and Woodhall said "the man in blue/red" over the course of these games? :brick: :lol:
he doesnt want to sound too complicated to the casual fan tho does he? woodhall is the best british commentator around imo
Stevieb8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Stevieb8006 »

Really rate woodhall
Dixonian
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Dixonian »

Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?

I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!

:lol: Serpentine meanderings... I bet McIntosh has crowbarred that phrase into one of his commentaries.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Counter-puncher »

Dixonian wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?

I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!

:lol: Serpentine meanderings... I bet McIntosh has crowbarred that phrase into one of his commentaries.

only when the purposive perambulations of his narrative took on a more speculative purview, placing him firmly in the pantheon of presenting paragons
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13283
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by MightyWarrior »

The judges are split over that round ..and you can't argue with that....well actually you can..
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by davie »

Davie's a fan!

Richie sounds knowledgeable without trying to be overly dramatic or controversial
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45229
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Dixonian wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Bent arm shot is too complicated?

I dread to think what you make of the serpentine meanderings of Ronald McIntosh's runaway vocabulary!

:lol: Serpentine meanderings... I bet McIntosh has crowbarred that phrase into one of his commentaries.
He probably use an actual crowbar as a toothpick.
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 866
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Ketchel »

Bring back Jim Neilly. I miss his commentary..... a lot.
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10940
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by ILikeBeer »

I don't mind him, for the most part.

He says what he thinks, and doesn't suck up to whatever the channel wants to him to say.
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1079
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by ScottDetonator »

I prefer Richie's commentary more than just about anyone else, to be honest.

I like how he reads a fight and doesn't sugar coat his thoughts.

I'd be perfectly happy to see Richie on every Sky broadcast but I don't think he would be the 'man' for them.
Stevieb8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Stevieb8006 »

I don't no why audley always gets overlooked when it comes to punditry. He is articulate and knowledgeable. Yet he always gets overlooked for the likes of Amir khan who can barely string a sentence together. Plus, he's one of our most successful amateurs.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by lefty »

I prefer Barry Jones to Richie Woodhall .....
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32868
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Richie Woodhall

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Stevieb8006 wrote:I don't no why audley always gets overlooked when it comes to punditry. He is articulate and knowledgeable. Yet he always gets overlooked for the likes of Amir khan who can barely string a sentence together. Plus, he's one of our most successful amateurs.
Yeah I always thought Audley would be an excellent pundit. Maybe he just doesn't fancy it though, as I can't remember him ever even properly attempting it.
Post Reply