Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - OFF

Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz Winner and How?

Hughie Fury Stoppage
0
No votes
Hughie Fury Decision
42
68%
Draw
2
3%
Andy Ruiz Decision
4
6%
Andy Ruiz Stoppage
14
23%
 
Total votes: 62

chrisnew86
Super Welterweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 11:18

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by chrisnew86 »

BitPlayer wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:This fight wont happen nor will any other on the bill. The bill if confirmed to date will be cancelled. Have to be crackers to buy a ticket and make hotel arrangements etc for this dated bill. I expect the title will be vacant by then.
"The title", Fury has WBA Super, WBO, IBO and The Ring, I'd be surprised if he was stripped of them all by then. Even if he was I don't think it's about titles, Wlad wants to avenge his loss.
Still..... fornicate buying a ticket for this. £200 to sit row Z for fight that's been a complete circus , nahhhh
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Mimmy »

BitPlayer wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:This fight wont happen nor will any other on the bill. The bill if confirmed to date will be cancelled. Have to be crackers to buy a ticket and make hotel arrangements etc for this dated bill. I expect the title will be vacant by then.
"The title", Fury has WBA Super, WBO, IBO and The Ring, I'd be surprised if he was stripped of them all by then. Even if he was I don't think it's about titles, Wlad wants to avenge his loss.
What is the WBA super? in terms with the WBA 'normal' heavyweight title what does the super bit mean?
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by BitPlayer »

mimmy123 wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:This fight wont happen nor will any other on the bill. The bill if confirmed to date will be cancelled. Have to be crackers to buy a ticket and make hotel arrangements etc for this dated bill. I expect the title will be vacant by then.
"The title", Fury has WBA Super, WBO, IBO and The Ring, I'd be surprised if he was stripped of them all by then. Even if he was I don't think it's about titles, Wlad wants to avenge his loss.
What is the WBA super? in terms with the WBA 'normal' heavyweight title what does the super bit mean?
It's the real WBA title, they have more than one to pocket more money. Someone here looked at the average ratings by boxrec of the fighter for each of the main titles, and the WBA Super came up as the best.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by tobyh5 »

Who gives a toss about Tyson Fury? Not me although I know many do still. Holds a lot of titles including (debatably) the lineal belt which makes him (arguably and certainly strongest claimant) the Champion but for me, he has almost become irrelevant. He is a placeholder and no more. His talk and interviews used to entertain me but the "we are victimised and persecuted" bs has worn thin. They do not get sponsorship and advertising because they are aresholes and do not present themselves in the way corporations would like. Stop effing moaning but recognise it and change or stay the same and stop the bellyaching.

Pull outs of fights, partying, fat gut, no interest in actually fighting. I just do not care at all anymore. He will go down in history as the link man between the reign of Klitschko and whoever the next dominant champion turns out to be.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Mimmy »

BitPlayer wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:
BitPlayer wrote: "The title", Fury has WBA Super, WBO, IBO and The Ring, I'd be surprised if he was stripped of them all by then. Even if he was I don't think it's about titles, Wlad wants to avenge his loss.
What is the WBA super? in terms with the WBA 'normal' heavyweight title what does the super bit mean?
It's the real WBA title, they have more than one to pocket more money. Someone here looked at the average ratings by boxrec of the fighter for each of the main titles, and the WBA Super came up as the best.
I dont understand this. According to boxrec LUIS ORTIZ is the WBA heavyweight champion, (titles held) the WBA says hes the intrim champion. So Fury is super champion but did he fight for the WBA normal belt or not. According to boxrec he cant have because Ortiz is the belt holder.

So being a super belt holder is better than being a world champion at that weight, even if you have never fought for their regular or normal belt??

Tell you something else that amazes me, all this crap with the WBA and super this and that and boxrec does not reconise any belt holder by MBC or BIBA. Whats going to be next from WBA, Mega Super world Champion?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Boxerbeetle »

mimmy123 wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:
What is the WBA super? in terms with the WBA 'normal' heavyweight title what does the super bit mean?
It's the real WBA title, they have more than one to pocket more money. Someone here looked at the average ratings by boxrec of the fighter for each of the main titles, and the WBA Super came up as the best.
I dont understand this. According to boxrec LUIS ORTIZ is the WBA heavyweight champion, (titles held) the WBA says hes the intrim champion. So Fury is super champion but did he fight for the WBA normal belt or not. According to boxrec he cant have because Ortiz is the belt holder.

So being a super belt holder is better than being a world champion at that weight, even if you have never fought for their regular or normal belt??

Tell you something else that amazes me, all this crap with the WBA and super this and that and boxrec does not reconise any belt holder by MBC or BIBA. Whats going to be next from WBA, Mega Super world Champion?
Do not try to understand the logic behind the alphabet titles. That way madness lies.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23227
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by handsofstone »

Pisses me off that Boxing Monthly have started recognising the "Regular" belt in their top 10 on the back page
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Oiky »

hughie decision :TU:
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Tuan_Jim »

handsofstone wrote:Pisses me off that Boxing Monthly have started recognising the "Regular" belt in their top 10 on the back page
I remember when Boxing Monthly and indeed the BBBoC refused to recognise the WBO. HBO refused to mention the WBO's name on air until I think the late 90s. In fact HBO ditched the name TVKO for their ppvs because it sounded too much like another ABC title. How depressing that they all eventually cave in. Now we have 4 or 5 WBA heavyweight champions at once.

God only knows how history will make sense of boxing post 2000.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Mimmy »

handsofstone wrote:Pisses me off that Boxing Monthly have started recognising the "Regular" belt in their top 10 on the back page
Maybe the WBA pay a fee to help the mag keep afloat?
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by tigermoth87 »

Good opponent for Hughie at this stage. Hughie by UD.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Andrew »

handsofstone wrote:Pisses me off that Boxing Monthly have started recognising the "Regular" belt in their top 10 on the back page
Yeah that annoyed me. I don't subscribe just browse my best mates copies when I'm there. I'm sure they have Joshua above Wlad in their rankings FFS.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Andrew »

Tuan_Jim wrote:
handsofstone wrote:Pisses me off that Boxing Monthly have started recognising the "Regular" belt in their top 10 on the back page
I remember when Boxing Monthly and indeed the BBBoC refused to recognise the WBO. HBO refused to mention the WBO's name on air until I think the late 90s. In fact HBO ditched the name TVKO for their ppvs because it sounded too much like another ABC title. How depressing that they all eventually cave in. Now we have 4 or 5 WBA heavyweight champions at once.

God only knows how history will make sense of boxing post 2000.
Whilst the WBA are pure scum this eventual tidying up they are doing ( which is taking far far too long) is creating and has potential to create some good fights.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by BitPlayer »

I bet they go back on it straight away and create new regular and Interim champs. Still I'll be happy to see Fury-Ortiz.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6646
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by THEBUTCH »

H Fury v Ruiz jnr caught me by surprise and Ruiz jnr still has a decent fight lined up before taking on Hughie.

Hughie on points.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Andrew »

Fight won't happen.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Killer Blow »

Is there any hope of Ruiz winning here. I absolutely can't stand Hughie Fury. He's even worse than Tyson. I can't watch him for more than 2 minutes without switching it off. The thought of the division being dominated by the Fury's in a similar way to the Klitchsko's makes my skin crawls.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Andy Ruiz is too obese to be effective beyond C level, which is probably why they keep feeding him 40 year old cadavers. My pick is Fury, but then again he too is so untested something might go wrong when up close and punches swinging.

As I said in the previous thread, their combined opposition has been so risk averse that both fighters should be offended that the other's management deemed them soft enough for their man to take.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6646
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by THEBUTCH »

This fight does seem to happening and Ruiz jnr just got another 10 rounds of experience in the bag, so the path is clear for the Tyson Fury undercard.

For someone who is maligned for his shape he developing well over the longer distance.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by lefty »

tobyh5 wrote:Who gives a toss about Tyson Fury? Not me although I know many do still. Holds a lot of titles including (debatably) the lineal belt which makes him (arguably and certainly strongest claimant) the Champion but for me, he has almost become irrelevant. He is a placeholder and no more. His talk and interviews used to entertain me but the "we are victimised and persecuted" bs has worn thin. They do not get sponsorship and advertising because they are aresholes and do not present themselves in the way corporations would like. Stop effing moaning but recognise it and change or stay the same and stop the bellyaching.

Pull outs of fights, partying, fat gut, no interest in actually fighting. I just do not care at all anymore. He will go down in history as the link man between the reign of Klitschko and whoever the next dominant champion turns out to be.
Do you reckon Tyson and Hughie are in the shape they are in for fights and outside of the ring due to just unfortunate genetics which obviously do factor a lot when it comes to how good of a shape someone can get into, especially in terms of building muscle; or do you believe they could get in a fair bit better shape than they do?
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by tobyh5 »

lefty wrote:
tobyh5 wrote:Who gives a toss about Tyson Fury? Not me although I know many do still. Holds a lot of titles including (debatably) the lineal belt which makes him (arguably and certainly strongest claimant) the Champion but for me, he has almost become irrelevant. He is a placeholder and no more. His talk and interviews used to entertain me but the "we are victimised and persecuted" bs has worn thin. They do not get sponsorship and advertising because they are aresholes and do not present themselves in the way corporations would like. Stop effing moaning but recognise it and change or stay the same and stop the bellyaching.

Pull outs of fights, partying, fat gut, no interest in actually fighting. I just do not care at all anymore. He will go down in history as the link man between the reign of Klitschko and whoever the next dominant champion turns out to be.
Do you reckon Tyson and Hughie are in the shape they are in for fights and outside of the ring due to just unfortunate genetics which obviously do factor a lot when it comes to how good of a shape someone can get into, especially in terms of building muscle; or do you believe they could get in a fair bit better shape than they do?

I am not sure if the physical appearance is to do with genetics as I have seen nothing to say they have bad genetics but I do not think it matters. They are in shape to fight when in the ring and I think being a body beautiful in boxing is needless. Be fit, strong and ready to fight.
Ian1973
Middleweight
Posts: 1447
Joined: 15 Feb 2014, 14:58

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Ian1973 »

lefty wrote:
tobyh5 wrote:Who gives a toss about Tyson Fury? Not me although I know many do still. Holds a lot of titles including (debatably) the lineal belt which makes him (arguably and certainly strongest claimant) the Champion but for me, he has almost become irrelevant. He is a placeholder and no more. His talk and interviews used to entertain me but the "we are victimised and persecuted" bs has worn thin. They do not get sponsorship and advertising because they are aresholes and do not present themselves in the way corporations would like. Stop effing moaning but recognise it and change or stay the same and stop the bellyaching.

Pull outs of fights, partying, fat gut, no interest in actually fighting. I just do not care at all anymore. He will go down in history as the link man between the reign of Klitschko and whoever the next dominant champion turns out to be.
Do you reckon Tyson and Hughie are in the shape they are in for fights and outside of the ring due to just unfortunate genetics which obviously do factor a lot when it comes to how good of a shape someone can get into, especially in terms of building muscle; or do you believe they could get in a fair bit better shape than they do?

The genetics are so bad that Tyson is heavyweight champion of the world (the real one).

There's clearly no issue here.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by Crease »

Something tells me that Hughie vs Ruiz is NOT going to happen.

I'm refusing to vote until the day before the supposed fight.
emallini
Middleweight
Posts: 1676
Joined: 08 Nov 2013, 12:31

Re: Hughie Fury vs. Andy Ruiz jr - October 29th 2016

Post by emallini »

Fight will definitely happen. Hughie by decision.
Post Reply