Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
According to a couple of sources including ESPN Desportes, Klitschko-Brown will be sanctioned by the WBA for the world title, and Fury will become WBA "Champion in Recess"
http://boxingnews.com.ua/en/news/17543- ... piona-mira
http://boxingnews.com.ua/en/news/17543- ... piona-mira
Last edited by Freedom2013 on 30 Sep 2016, 03:15, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
If it happens that's still quite an intriguing fight.
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
A couple of sources you say?Freedom2013 wrote:According to a couple of sources including ESPN Desportes, Klitschko-Brown will be sanctioned by the WBA for the world title, and Fury will become WBA "Champion in Recess"
http://boxingnews.com.ua/ru/novosti/175 ... piona-mira
The shortcut above tells no English only speaking person anything.
Where are the other sources you are claiming?
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
I thought Wlad's next opponent was going to be Fury, Joshua, Ortiz, and literally everyone else in the division. Well if it's Browne today, who is it going to be tomorrow? Also, I heard that Browne was fighting Oquendo. So now I have to choose which among a whole bevy of conflicting rumors to believe.
-
jezzamundo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
If Klitschko is even a shadow of his former self he should still beat Browne handily.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Browne? Lucas Browne?
God awful. Total wipeout.
Wlad -5000.
God awful. Total wipeout.
Wlad -5000.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
The HW scene is a clusterfuck.
I thought it was supposed to be so great once Wlad lost? Hey, at least we got Martin-Glazkov
I thought it was supposed to be so great once Wlad lost? Hey, at least we got Martin-Glazkov
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Dont forget the Wilder v Arreola an Joshua v Breazeale classicscrusader wrote:The HW scene is a clusterfuck.
I thought it was supposed to be so great once Wlad lost? Hey, at least we got Martin-Glazkov
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
English translation of the Ukrainian site: http://boxingnews.com.ua/en/news/17543- ... piona-miraLike a Boss wrote:A couple of sources you say?Freedom2013 wrote:According to a couple of sources including ESPN Desportes, Klitschko-Brown will be sanctioned by the WBA for the world title, and Fury will become WBA "Champion in Recess"
http://boxingnews.com.ua/ru/novosti/175 ... piona-mira
The shortcut above tells no English only speaking person anything.
Several on twitter, as well as Polsat Sport... We'll know more in a few days.Where are the other sources you are claiming?
https://twitter.com/polsatsport/status/ ... 7541767168
https://twitter.com/baylorictvboxin/sta ... 3553627136
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
What about Oquendo?
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
No fight for the regular title then?
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
It would have to be for the regular title.Killer Blow wrote:No fight for the regular title then?
To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
The proposed Browne-Oquendo fight might be a problem for the WBA though- unless Oquendo foregoes his right to the contest.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title. Chudinov who had this belt before he was robbed, also didn't have other titles, and Sturm himself earlier owned a MW Super title and only it.SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
That is the criteria, as stated on the WBA website - read it for yourself:boxing_rocks wrote:That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title.SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-super-cham ... -64Rb3me0M
I don't know anything about the Sturm situation.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Klitschko vs Browne is whatever, but Klitschko vs AJ is the far more desirable rumored matchup.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Most of their "super" champions don't own any other major titles:SteveO wrote:That is the criteria, as stated on the WBA website - read it for yourself:boxing_rocks wrote:That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title.SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-super-cham ... -64Rb3me0M
I don't know anything about the Sturm situation.
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-champions#.V-7EZfkrK9J
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
WBA doesn't follow its own rules at all. They will have super, regular and interim champions when their 'super' champ isn't a unified champ, their regular champ is healthy and defending and their interim champ is fight nobodies in his back yard.SteveO wrote:That is the criteria, as stated on the WBA website - read it for yourself:boxing_rocks wrote:That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title.SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-super-cham ... -64Rb3me0M
I don't know anything about the Sturm situation.
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Bingo!Sids wrote:What about Oquendo?
If fit, Oquendo contests the regular title in his next fight. That is chiselled in stone.
The WBA have already told Browne he is in the other corner and the pair have about another week to get that fight set.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Watch Oquendo accept step aside money secure in the knowledge that the court order guarantees he will eventually get his title shot and the payday that comes with it.
-
Like a Boss
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 5863
- Joined: 01 May 2012, 03:21
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
It may well prove to be a very attractive option for him. He'd be a fool not to listen to what they might have to offer.Perseus wrote:Watch Oquendo accept step aside money secure in the knowledge that the court order guarantees he will eventually get his title shot and the payday that comes with it.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
This was on the Boxing Kingdom site only Haye was mentioned as well.
https://twitter.com/BoxingKingdom14/sta ... 9252256768
How much credibility you can put in that who knows?
https://twitter.com/BoxingKingdom14/sta ... 9252256768
How much credibility you can put in that who knows?
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Beibut Shumenov was upgraded to Super champion after about 15 months of inactivityboxing_rocks wrote:That's not true. Drug cheat Sturm is currently holding a WBA Super SMW title without having any other title. Chudinov who had this belt before he was robbed, also didn't have other titles, and Sturm himself earlier owned a MW Super title and only it.SteveO wrote: To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Haha would be funny if everyone ducks Joshua. He would have to give up his paper title to become #1 mandatory for other belts.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
Fury being stripped could be horrible news for him, strange how we might end job with Ortiz and Price as the only options...and Ortiz won't really be an option given his high risk low reward nature.Grailer wrote:Haha would be funny if everyone ducks Joshua. He would have to give up his paper title to become #1 mandatory for other belts.
Re: Klitschko vs. Browne for the WBA title?
SteveO wrote:It would have to be for the regular title.Killer Blow wrote:No fight for the regular title then?
To become a WBA super-champion the boxer has to hold the WBA belt plus one other, WBC, IBF or WBO.
The proposed Browne-Oquendo fight might be a problem for the WBA though- unless Oquendo foregoes his right to the contest.