Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Is there any chance this could be in Germany or is it set for london/Manchester?
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Looks like it might not even be on.MacTavish wrote:Is there any chance this could be in Germany or is it set for london/Manchester?
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
I saw it's now in doubt
What's happening
What's happening
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Doubt very mush itr was even on ,, All the bullshit about waiting for the bodies to sort it out is that just bullshit ,
Lets have it right if they did'nt sanction this one, who they going to sanction Haye versus Briggs , and even if they did this fight does'nt need belts , but theres no way would the bodies want to miss out on a sanction fee
Lets have it right if they did'nt sanction this one, who they going to sanction Haye versus Briggs , and even if they did this fight does'nt need belts , but theres no way would the bodies want to miss out on a sanction fee
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt
What's happening
Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Well Haye vs Briggs is not happening at all because Briggs wants PPV, and nobody will show that fight on PPV.coneye wrote:Doubt very mush itr was even on ,, All the bullshit about waiting for the bodies to sort it out is that just bullshit ,
Lets have it right if they did'nt sanction this one, who they going to sanction Haye versus Briggs , and even if they did this fight does'nt need belts , but theres no way would the bodies want to miss out on a sanction fee
Klitchko wants his belts back, which I completely understand. Possibly the only fighter who would fight for belts over money. The WBA won't sanction the fight because they have legal obligations under the circumstances to let the number 1 and number 2 contenders fight for the vacant belt. Klitchko could fight for the IBF, but for some reason he wants the WBA. This fight was always doomed from the very start.
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
mimmy123 wrote:Thats a good idea, a respected member or boxer thats been here a while and is trustworthy. a upcoming boxer who has a handfull to sell would surely sell them easily enough here.afcmarshall wrote:Be good to have a thread like the betting one where people can post tickets for sale at face value or put details of boxers they know selling tickets for events or for boxers them selves to come on to put tickets onmimmy123 wrote:What we could do with is a designated ticket seller on here, someone who knows a boxer who can get us tickets.
I would be than happy to donate 50 quid on top to any boxers favourite charity who wanted to do so.
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
BitPlayer wrote:Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt
What's happening
Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.
and this is why folk walk away from boxing and go to MMA
ffsake
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Cheers. I listened to half the IFL thing just now before the dodgy sound did me in.BitPlayer wrote:Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt
What's happening
Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.
I obviously don't know the ins & outs but I always thought it was a big risk from Wlad to come to the UK to fight AJ when he probably could fight someone a lot easier at home for decent money. And Wlad has not really shown a love of risk in the last few years.
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap 
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same timelefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23133
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Yes.Taansend wrote:Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same timelefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
J wrote:BitPlayer wrote:Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt
What's happening
Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.
and this is why folk walk away from boxing and go to MMA
ffsake
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Ortiz would dismantle him outside of Germany.mickey1975 wrote:Yes.Taansend wrote:Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same timelefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Tag team boxing. It's a new venture Klitschko is trying out to try and attract more viewers.Taansend wrote:Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same timelefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
I think he'd have a good chance of knocking him out in Germany let alone outside of the country.Killer Blow wrote:Ortiz would dismantle him outside of Germany.mickey1975 wrote:Yes.Taansend wrote:
Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same time
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Now Briggs just tweeted that he has some good news to share 
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Well with the WBA I guess anything could happen but Browne is supposed to be fighting Oquendo for the WBA title.lefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
I wish Oquendo would piss off. No offence to him.SteveO wrote:Well with the WBA I guess anything could happen but Browne is supposed to be fighting Oquendo for the WBA title.lefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Yeah I'm just concerned Wlad will be able to hold excessively and wear him down in Germany. But anywhere else it's lights out.lefty wrote:I think he'd have a good chance of knocking him out in Germany let alone outside of the country.Killer Blow wrote:Ortiz would dismantle him outside of Germany.mickey1975 wrote: Yes.
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Yeah very true. I forgot about that aspect of Klitschko's game momentarily.Killer Blow wrote:Yeah I'm just concerned Wlad will be able to hold excessively and wear him down in Germany. But anywhere else it's lights out.lefty wrote:I think he'd have a good chance of knocking him out in Germany let alone outside of the country.Killer Blow wrote:
Ortiz would dismantle him outside of Germany.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
Yup; I watched recordings of a boxing card I was out of the country for, and the last UFC card that was on BT sport, and the UFC card, as usual, absolutely knocked spots of it. The Bisping fight was sensational, I was falling asleep during the boxing card.J wrote:BitPlayer wrote:Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt
What's happening
Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.
and this is why folk walk away from boxing and go to MMA
ffsake
I can honestly say I can't recall the last time I watched a really exciting boxing card.
I was watching Barrera Morales the other night, when was the last time a big fight lived up to that kind of hype?
Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed
The UFC 205 card is immense aswell.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Yup; I watched recordings of a boxing card I was out of the country for, and the last UFC card that was on BT sport, and the UFC card, as usual, absolutely knocked spots of it. The Bisping fight was sensational, I was falling asleep during the boxing card.J wrote:BitPlayer wrote: Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.
Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.
and this is why folk walk away from boxing and go to MMA
ffsake
I can honestly say I can't recall the last time I watched a really exciting boxing card.
I was watching Barrera Morales the other night, when was the last time a big fight lived up to that kind of hype?