Joshua v Klit terms agreed

MacTavish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 961
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 11:03

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by MacTavish »

Is there any chance this could be in Germany or is it set for london/Manchester?
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by BitPlayer »

MacTavish wrote:Is there any chance this could be in Germany or is it set for london/Manchester?
Looks like it might not even be on.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Taansend »

I saw it's now in doubt

What's happening
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Counter-puncher »

:lol:
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8627
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by coneye »

Doubt very mush itr was even on ,, All the bullshit about waiting for the bodies to sort it out is that just bullshit ,
Lets have it right if they did'nt sanction this one, who they going to sanction Haye versus Briggs , and even if they did this fight does'nt need belts , but theres no way would the bodies want to miss out on a sanction fee
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by BitPlayer »

Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt

What's happening
Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.

Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Rob3_142 »

coneye wrote:Doubt very mush itr was even on ,, All the bullshit about waiting for the bodies to sort it out is that just bullshit ,
Lets have it right if they did'nt sanction this one, who they going to sanction Haye versus Briggs , and even if they did this fight does'nt need belts , but theres no way would the bodies want to miss out on a sanction fee
Well Haye vs Briggs is not happening at all because Briggs wants PPV, and nobody will show that fight on PPV.

Klitchko wants his belts back, which I completely understand. Possibly the only fighter who would fight for belts over money. The WBA won't sanction the fight because they have legal obligations under the circumstances to let the number 1 and number 2 contenders fight for the vacant belt. Klitchko could fight for the IBF, but for some reason he wants the WBA. This fight was always doomed from the very start.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by J »

mimmy123 wrote:
afcmarshall wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:What we could do with is a designated ticket seller on here, someone who knows a boxer who can get us tickets.
Be good to have a thread like the betting one where people can post tickets for sale at face value or put details of boxers they know selling tickets for events or for boxers them selves to come on to put tickets on
Thats a good idea, a respected member or boxer thats been here a while and is trustworthy. a upcoming boxer who has a handfull to sell would surely sell them easily enough here.

I would be than happy to donate 50 quid on top to any boxers favourite charity who wanted to do so.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by J »

BitPlayer wrote:
Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt

What's happening
Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.

Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.


and this is why folk walk away from boxing and go to MMA

ffsake
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Taansend »

BitPlayer wrote:
Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt

What's happening
Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.

Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.
Cheers. I listened to half the IFL thing just now before the dodgy sound did me in.

I obviously don't know the ins & outs but I always thought it was a big risk from Wlad to come to the UK to fight AJ when he probably could fight someone a lot easier at home for decent money. And Wlad has not really shown a love of risk in the last few years.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by lefty »

Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap :lol:
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Taansend »

lefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap :lol:
Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same time :clap:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23134
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by mickey1975 »

Taansend wrote:
lefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap :lol:
Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same time :clap:
Yes.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Counter-puncher »

J wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt

What's happening
Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.

Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.


and this is why folk walk away from boxing and go to MMA

ffsake
:TU:
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Killer Blow »

mickey1975 wrote:
Taansend wrote:
lefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap :lol:
Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same time :clap:
Yes.
Ortiz would dismantle him outside of Germany.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by lefty »

Taansend wrote:
lefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap :lol:
Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same time :clap:
Tag team boxing. It's a new venture Klitschko is trying out to try and attract more viewers.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by lefty »

Killer Blow wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
Taansend wrote:
Do you think Klitschko could beat both Browne & Ortiz at the same time :clap:
Yes.
Ortiz would dismantle him outside of Germany.
I think he'd have a good chance of knocking him out in Germany let alone outside of the country.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Taansend »

Now Briggs just tweeted that he has some good news to share :o
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by lefty »

:zzz: :roll:
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1386
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by SteveO »

lefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap :lol:
Well with the WBA I guess anything could happen but Browne is supposed to be fighting Oquendo for the WBA title.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by lefty »

SteveO wrote:
lefty wrote:Klitschko vs Brown/Ortiz for the WBA strap I reckon. Joshua vs Price for a defence of his IBF strap :lol:
Well with the WBA I guess anything could happen but Browne is supposed to be fighting Oquendo for the WBA title.
I wish Oquendo would piss off. No offence to him.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by Killer Blow »

lefty wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: Yes.
Ortiz would dismantle him outside of Germany.
I think he'd have a good chance of knocking him out in Germany let alone outside of the country.
Yeah I'm just concerned Wlad will be able to hold excessively and wear him down in Germany. But anywhere else it's lights out.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by lefty »

Killer Blow wrote:
lefty wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
Ortiz would dismantle him outside of Germany.
I think he'd have a good chance of knocking him out in Germany let alone outside of the country.
Yeah I'm just concerned Wlad will be able to hold excessively and wear him down in Germany. But anywhere else it's lights out.
Yeah very true. I forgot about that aspect of Klitschko's game momentarily.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

J wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:
Taansend wrote:I saw it's now in doubt

What's happening
Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.

Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.


and this is why folk walk away from boxing and go to MMA

ffsake
Yup; I watched recordings of a boxing card I was out of the country for, and the last UFC card that was on BT sport, and the UFC card, as usual, absolutely knocked spots of it. The Bisping fight was sensational, I was falling asleep during the boxing card.

I can honestly say I can't recall the last time I watched a really exciting boxing card.

I was watching Barrera Morales the other night, when was the last time a big fight lived up to that kind of hype?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Joshua v Klit terms agreed

Post by lefty »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
J wrote:
BitPlayer wrote: Don't know, allegedly the WBA won't give them their super belt for it (why should they?) and Hearn claims Wlad won't fight without it.

Sounds like it was all just bullshit to me.


and this is why folk walk away from boxing and go to MMA

ffsake
Yup; I watched recordings of a boxing card I was out of the country for, and the last UFC card that was on BT sport, and the UFC card, as usual, absolutely knocked spots of it. The Bisping fight was sensational, I was falling asleep during the boxing card.

I can honestly say I can't recall the last time I watched a really exciting boxing card.

I was watching Barrera Morales the other night, when was the last time a big fight lived up to that kind of hype?
The UFC 205 card is immense aswell.
Post Reply