Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Where should Kell Brook fight?

Poll ended at 06 Nov 2016, 18:25

147
16
42%
154
22
58%
 
Total votes: 38

lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by lefty »

BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
Spence could have boxed Brook in the summer but his team said he wasn't ready.
You're just regurgitating a line that Hearn spewed.
Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.
The clue is in bold.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by BigDoofus »

lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote: You're just regurgitating a line that Hearn spewed.
Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.
The clue is in bold.
If so why didn't Spence's team rebuke this? Why didn't Haymon make Brook an offer?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by lefty »

BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.
The clue is in bold.
If so why didn't Spence's team rebuke this? Why didn't Haymon make Brook an offer?
When does Haymon ever speak publically? Spence jnr himself rebuked it though. Also why is Haymons team going to make a counter offer when they're the mandatory challenger?
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by BigDoofus »

lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote: The clue is in bold.
If so why didn't Spence's team rebuke this? Why didn't Haymon make Brook an offer?
When does Haymon ever speak publically? Spence jnr himself rebuked it though. Also why is Haymons team going to make a counter offer when they're the mandatory challenger?
The mandatory challenger earns a tiny %age of the purse so Haymon could have made an offer to stop Spence fighting in UK for peanuts.
Thurman, Garcia, Spence and Khan are all Haymon fighters at the same weight that Brook holds a title. Why hasn't Haymon made Brook an offer for any of these fighters?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23134
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by mickey1975 »

BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
If so why didn't Spence's team rebuke this? Why didn't Haymon make Brook an offer?
When does Haymon ever speak publically? Spence jnr himself rebuked it though. Also why is Haymons team going to make a counter offer when they're the mandatory challenger?
The mandatory challenger earns a tiny %age of the purse so Haymon could have made an offer to stop Spence fighting in UK for peanuts.
Thurman, Garcia, Spence and Khan are all Haymon fighters at the same weight that Brook holds a title. Why hasn't Haymon made Brook an offer for any of these fighters?
25% is much bigger than most voluntary challengers.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by littlepug »

mickey1975 wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote: When does Haymon ever speak publically? Spence jnr himself rebuked it though. Also why is Haymons team going to make a counter offer when they're the mandatory challenger?
The mandatory challenger earns a tiny %age of the purse so Haymon could have made an offer to stop Spence fighting in UK for peanuts.
Thurman, Garcia, Spence and Khan are all Haymon fighters at the same weight that Brook holds a title. Why hasn't Haymon made Brook an offer for any of these fighters?
25% is much bigger than most voluntary challengers.
shouldn't really be haggling that much when your the challenger, get the belt then make your money
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by keithmoonhangover »

BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
Spence could have boxed Brook in the summer but his team said he wasn't ready.
You're just regurgitating a line that Hearn spewed.
Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.
Spence's team were waiting for the mandatory slot. :TU:
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by BigDoofus »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
lefty wrote: You're just regurgitating a line that Hearn spewed.
Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.
Spence's team were waiting for the mandatory slot. :TU:
By turning down the fight.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by keithmoonhangover »

BigDoofus wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.
Spence's team were waiting for the mandatory slot. :TU:
By turning down the fight.
Yes.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

littlepug wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
The mandatory challenger earns a tiny %age of the purse so Haymon could have made an offer to stop Spence fighting in UK for peanuts.
Thurman, Garcia, Spence and Khan are all Haymon fighters at the same weight that Brook holds a title. Why hasn't Haymon made Brook an offer for any of these fighters?
25% is much bigger than most voluntary challengers.
shouldn't really be haggling that much when your the challenger, get the belt then make your money
Trouble is, everyone thinks they're a star these days, and think's they're worth a fortune, some of them are right, some are delusional.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by BigDoofus »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Spence's team were waiting for the mandatory slot. :TU:
By turning down the fight.
Yes.
Spence turning the fight down certainly backs up lefty's theory that Brook wants none of Spence.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by lefty »

BigDoofus wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
BigDoofus wrote:
By turning down the fight.
Yes.
Spence turning the fight down certainly backs up lefty's theory that Brook wants none of Spence.
Spence didn't turn it down though :doh: .... they're waiting on the mandatory being enforced. At the moment Brook is holding it up because he's no vacating the belt but he's also not saying he's definietly going to fight at 147 again.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by Autobarn »

Counter-puncher wrote:the cynic in me thinks if he does 147 and does badly it gives him an excuse for it
And it'll be another massive setback - after having his eye socket battered and broken by Golovkin - to withstand a painful, weight drained beating to Spence.

Hope he can do 147 well and put on a great show with Spence.

Brook looked great dealing with his mandos, physically he looked fine, lean and mean after making weight sacrifices. Better than the pudgy square guy of the Golovkin fight, anyway. Hoping he can still do 147 well after that weight folly, trying to be "the bigger man" against Golovkin.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by BigDoofus »

lefty wrote:Sounds like brook doesn't want any part of Spence jnr.
Is that how it sounds?
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by Syntax Error »

How can Brook be accused of dodging other welterweights by going up two weight classes to take on the best middleweight in a decade? :oo :confused:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by Horse »

Syntax Error wrote:How can Brook be accused of dodging other welterweights by going up two weight classes to take on the best middleweight in a decade? :oo :confused:
Because dodging is dodging.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by Syntax Error »

Horse wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:How can Brook be accused of dodging other welterweights by going up two weight classes to take on the best middleweight in a decade? :oo :confused:
Because dodging is dodging.
Not when he's going up to fight someone bigger & better it isn't.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by Horse »

Syntax Error wrote:Not when he's going up to fight someone bigger & better it isn't.
A fight that he wasn't expected to win for a big paycheck. No excuse.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by samwbr »

Horse wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:Not when he's going up to fight someone bigger & better it isn't.
A fight that he wasn't expected to win for a big paycheck. No excuse.
He did actually have to fight him.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by lefty »

samwbr wrote:
Horse wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:Not when he's going up to fight someone bigger & better it isn't.
A fight that he wasn't expected to win for a big paycheck. No excuse.
He did actually have to fight him.
He did have to fight Golovkin? Huh?
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by samwbr »

lefty wrote:
samwbr wrote:
Horse wrote:A fight that he wasn't expected to win for a big paycheck. No excuse.
He did actually have to fight him.
He did have to fight Golovkin? Huh?
For the cheque. Horse makes out like it's all figures on a screen and no one does anything.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by Syntax Error »

samwbr wrote:
lefty wrote:
samwbr wrote: He did actually have to fight him.
He did have to fight Golovkin? Huh?
For the cheque. Horse makes out like it's all figures on a screen and no one does anything.
I just don't get how Brook can be accused of ducking Spence Jr when he took on Golovkin instead.

I could understand if he fought No No Dan again or similar, but he took on an opponent far more dangerous than Spence Jr.

Spence Jr probably beats Brook too, that's if he is as good as he has looked to date, but fighting Golovkin was a far more dangerous proposition.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by Horse »

Syntax Error wrote:I just don't get how Brook can be accused of ducking Spence Jr when he took on Golovkin instead.

I could understand if he fought No No Dan again or similar, but he took on an opponent far more dangerous than Spence Jr.

Spence Jr probably beats Brook too, that's if he is as good as he has looked to date, but fighting Golovkin was a far more dangerous proposition.
Golovkin was a better risk vs reward fight. A cynical fight that got in the way of better fights being made for both of them.

Brook might still fight Spence, so I think it's a bit too early to say he has ducked him.

Brook does have a reputation for avoiding good fights though, so he will probably fight a bunch of nobodies instead.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by samwbr »

Horse wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:I just don't get how Brook can be accused of ducking Spence Jr when he took on Golovkin instead.

I could understand if he fought No No Dan again or similar, but he took on an opponent far more dangerous than Spence Jr.

Spence Jr probably beats Brook too, that's if he is as good as he has looked to date, but fighting Golovkin was a far more dangerous proposition.
Golovkin was a better risk vs reward fight. A cynical fight that got in the way of better fights being made for both of them.

Brook might still fight Spence, so I think it's a bit too early to say he has ducked him.

Brook does have a reputation for avoiding good fights though, so he will probably fight a bunch of nobodies instead.
Who has he avoided, for definite?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!

Post by Horse »

samwbr wrote:Who has he avoided, for definite?
It doesn't matter. He's content with average opposition.

He's been a pro for over 12 years and has only fought one world class opponent that he had a chance against.

He ducks good opponents in general rather than anyone specific.
Post Reply