The clue is in bold.BigDoofus wrote:Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.lefty wrote:You're just regurgitating a line that Hearn spewed.BigDoofus wrote:
Spence could have boxed Brook in the summer but his team said he wasn't ready.
Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
If so why didn't Spence's team rebuke this? Why didn't Haymon make Brook an offer?lefty wrote:The clue is in bold.BigDoofus wrote:Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.lefty wrote: You're just regurgitating a line that Hearn spewed.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
When does Haymon ever speak publically? Spence jnr himself rebuked it though. Also why is Haymons team going to make a counter offer when they're the mandatory challenger?BigDoofus wrote:If so why didn't Spence's team rebuke this? Why didn't Haymon make Brook an offer?lefty wrote:The clue is in bold.BigDoofus wrote:
Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
The mandatory challenger earns a tiny %age of the purse so Haymon could have made an offer to stop Spence fighting in UK for peanuts.lefty wrote:When does Haymon ever speak publically? Spence jnr himself rebuked it though. Also why is Haymons team going to make a counter offer when they're the mandatory challenger?BigDoofus wrote:If so why didn't Spence's team rebuke this? Why didn't Haymon make Brook an offer?lefty wrote: The clue is in bold.
Thurman, Garcia, Spence and Khan are all Haymon fighters at the same weight that Brook holds a title. Why hasn't Haymon made Brook an offer for any of these fighters?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23138
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
25% is much bigger than most voluntary challengers.BigDoofus wrote:The mandatory challenger earns a tiny %age of the purse so Haymon could have made an offer to stop Spence fighting in UK for peanuts.lefty wrote:When does Haymon ever speak publically? Spence jnr himself rebuked it though. Also why is Haymons team going to make a counter offer when they're the mandatory challenger?BigDoofus wrote:
If so why didn't Spence's team rebuke this? Why didn't Haymon make Brook an offer?
Thurman, Garcia, Spence and Khan are all Haymon fighters at the same weight that Brook holds a title. Why hasn't Haymon made Brook an offer for any of these fighters?
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
shouldn't really be haggling that much when your the challenger, get the belt then make your moneymickey1975 wrote:25% is much bigger than most voluntary challengers.BigDoofus wrote:The mandatory challenger earns a tiny %age of the purse so Haymon could have made an offer to stop Spence fighting in UK for peanuts.lefty wrote: When does Haymon ever speak publically? Spence jnr himself rebuked it though. Also why is Haymons team going to make a counter offer when they're the mandatory challenger?
Thurman, Garcia, Spence and Khan are all Haymon fighters at the same weight that Brook holds a title. Why hasn't Haymon made Brook an offer for any of these fighters?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Spence's team were waiting for the mandatory slot.BigDoofus wrote:Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.lefty wrote:You're just regurgitating a line that Hearn spewed.BigDoofus wrote:
Spence could have boxed Brook in the summer but his team said he wasn't ready.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
By turning down the fight.keithmoonhangover wrote:Spence's team were waiting for the mandatory slot.BigDoofus wrote:Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.lefty wrote: You're just regurgitating a line that Hearn spewed.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Yes.BigDoofus wrote:By turning down the fight.keithmoonhangover wrote:Spence's team were waiting for the mandatory slot.BigDoofus wrote:
Hearn claimed Spence's team told him this twice. There was no counter-offer from Haymon.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Trouble is, everyone thinks they're a star these days, and think's they're worth a fortune, some of them are right, some are delusional.littlepug wrote:shouldn't really be haggling that much when your the challenger, get the belt then make your moneymickey1975 wrote:25% is much bigger than most voluntary challengers.BigDoofus wrote:
The mandatory challenger earns a tiny %age of the purse so Haymon could have made an offer to stop Spence fighting in UK for peanuts.
Thurman, Garcia, Spence and Khan are all Haymon fighters at the same weight that Brook holds a title. Why hasn't Haymon made Brook an offer for any of these fighters?
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Spence turning the fight down certainly backs up lefty's theory that Brook wants none of Spence.keithmoonhangover wrote:Yes.BigDoofus wrote:By turning down the fight.keithmoonhangover wrote:
Spence's team were waiting for the mandatory slot.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Spence didn't turn it down thoughBigDoofus wrote:Spence turning the fight down certainly backs up lefty's theory that Brook wants none of Spence.keithmoonhangover wrote:Yes.BigDoofus wrote:
By turning down the fight.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
And it'll be another massive setback - after having his eye socket battered and broken by Golovkin - to withstand a painful, weight drained beating to Spence.Counter-puncher wrote:the cynic in me thinks if he does 147 and does badly it gives him an excuse for it
Hope he can do 147 well and put on a great show with Spence.
Brook looked great dealing with his mandos, physically he looked fine, lean and mean after making weight sacrifices. Better than the pudgy square guy of the Golovkin fight, anyway. Hoping he can still do 147 well after that weight folly, trying to be "the bigger man" against Golovkin.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Is that how it sounds?lefty wrote:Sounds like brook doesn't want any part of Spence jnr.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9025
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
How can Brook be accused of dodging other welterweights by going up two weight classes to take on the best middleweight in a decade?
![[icon_e_confused.gif] :confused:](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Because dodging is dodging.Syntax Error wrote:How can Brook be accused of dodging other welterweights by going up two weight classes to take on the best middleweight in a decade?![]()
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9025
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Not when he's going up to fight someone bigger & better it isn't.Horse wrote:Because dodging is dodging.Syntax Error wrote:How can Brook be accused of dodging other welterweights by going up two weight classes to take on the best middleweight in a decade?![]()
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
A fight that he wasn't expected to win for a big paycheck. No excuse.Syntax Error wrote:Not when he's going up to fight someone bigger & better it isn't.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
He did actually have to fight him.Horse wrote:A fight that he wasn't expected to win for a big paycheck. No excuse.Syntax Error wrote:Not when he's going up to fight someone bigger & better it isn't.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
He did have to fight Golovkin? Huh?samwbr wrote:He did actually have to fight him.Horse wrote:A fight that he wasn't expected to win for a big paycheck. No excuse.Syntax Error wrote:Not when he's going up to fight someone bigger & better it isn't.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
For the cheque. Horse makes out like it's all figures on a screen and no one does anything.lefty wrote:He did have to fight Golovkin? Huh?samwbr wrote:He did actually have to fight him.Horse wrote:A fight that he wasn't expected to win for a big paycheck. No excuse.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9025
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
I just don't get how Brook can be accused of ducking Spence Jr when he took on Golovkin instead.samwbr wrote:For the cheque. Horse makes out like it's all figures on a screen and no one does anything.lefty wrote:He did have to fight Golovkin? Huh?samwbr wrote: He did actually have to fight him.
I could understand if he fought No No Dan again or similar, but he took on an opponent far more dangerous than Spence Jr.
Spence Jr probably beats Brook too, that's if he is as good as he has looked to date, but fighting Golovkin was a far more dangerous proposition.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Golovkin was a better risk vs reward fight. A cynical fight that got in the way of better fights being made for both of them.Syntax Error wrote:I just don't get how Brook can be accused of ducking Spence Jr when he took on Golovkin instead.
I could understand if he fought No No Dan again or similar, but he took on an opponent far more dangerous than Spence Jr.
Spence Jr probably beats Brook too, that's if he is as good as he has looked to date, but fighting Golovkin was a far more dangerous proposition.
Brook might still fight Spence, so I think it's a bit too early to say he has ducked him.
Brook does have a reputation for avoiding good fights though, so he will probably fight a bunch of nobodies instead.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
Who has he avoided, for definite?Horse wrote:Golovkin was a better risk vs reward fight. A cynical fight that got in the way of better fights being made for both of them.Syntax Error wrote:I just don't get how Brook can be accused of ducking Spence Jr when he took on Golovkin instead.
I could understand if he fought No No Dan again or similar, but he took on an opponent far more dangerous than Spence Jr.
Spence Jr probably beats Brook too, that's if he is as good as he has looked to date, but fighting Golovkin was a far more dangerous proposition.
Brook might still fight Spence, so I think it's a bit too early to say he has ducked him.
Brook does have a reputation for avoiding good fights though, so he will probably fight a bunch of nobodies instead.
Re: Kell Brook wants to stay at welterweight!!
It doesn't matter. He's content with average opposition.samwbr wrote:Who has he avoided, for definite?
He's been a pro for over 12 years and has only fought one world class opponent that he had a chance against.
He ducks good opponents in general rather than anyone specific.