This thread just took an interesting turn!keithmoonhangover wrote:dberry wrote:Bullshit, pudendum, Browne worked his way up and took an, albeit soft, version of the WBA title from the title holder, Haye has had a massive layoff and not yet, in reality, fought!gilgamesh wrote:Browne's in the same boat as Haye. Neither are worthy of a title shot at the moment.
I used to like you but nowadays you're proving to be a total imbecile, you inbred fucken hick. Glad you never took me up with my offer for a paid working holiday to Melbourne, you're a total dick.
"David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23227
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Haha jee whizz
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Except the mighty Zumbano Love.asdfjkl wrote:Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?Dixonian wrote:What has Briggs done except fight bums?Like a Boss wrote:Lucas Browne has said David Haye doesn't deserve a world title shot :
"Coming off a two- to three-year lay-off and coming back fighting two bums basically, how does that get you No 1 ranked in all three belts and then a world title shot by fighting two people that aren't ranked and no one knows?
"I don't think he deserves anything, no."
"Just in regards to the UK fans, it's good that I can actually fight someone like Shannon Briggs that David Haye has avoided," said Briggs.
"I know that David Haye said that if he did fight on his undercard and win, then he would fight him. I believe he has ducked him because he's too dangerous, but here I am fighting Shannon Briggs now.
http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... title-shot
Briggs is very good at asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
davie wrote:This thread just took an interesting turn!keithmoonhangover wrote:dberry wrote: Bullshit, pudendum, Browne worked his way up and took an, albeit soft, version of the WBA title from the title holder, Haye has had a massive layoff and not yet, in reality, fought!
I used to like you but nowadays you're proving to be a total imbecile, you inbred fucken hick. Glad you never took me up with my offer for a paid working holiday to Melbourne, you're a total dick.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Damn dude is Browne a blood relative to you or something?dberry wrote:Bullshit, pudendum, Browne worked his way up and took an, albeit soft, version of the WBA title from the title holder, Haye has had a massive layoff and not yet, in reality, fought!gilgamesh wrote:Browne's in the same boat as Haye. Neither are worthy of a title shot at the moment.
I used to like you but nowadays you're proving to be a total imbecile, you inbred fucken hick. Glad you never took me up with my offer for a paid working holiday to Melbourne, you're a total dick.
I'm not insulting the guy personally I just don't think he's done enough yet to be competing for World Titles really. I thought it was awesome that he beat Chagaev, and I was glad that he had his PED results overturned since he was innocent of the charges. I have no doubt he'll beat Briggs. I just don't think a fight between a guy who's arguably no better than Top 15 and a shot old man should be for a World Title. Sorry if that makes me a d*ck.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Like Love who took him the distance in a performance that showed just where Briggs is at? You truly are gullible to a staggering extentasdfjkl wrote:Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?Dixonian wrote:What has Briggs done except fight bums?Like a Boss wrote:Lucas Browne has said David Haye doesn't deserve a world title shot :
"Coming off a two- to three-year lay-off and coming back fighting two bums basically, how does that get you No 1 ranked in all three belts and then a world title shot by fighting two people that aren't ranked and no one knows?
"I don't think he deserves anything, no."
"Just in regards to the UK fans, it's good that I can actually fight someone like Shannon Briggs that David Haye has avoided," said Briggs.
"I know that David Haye said that if he did fight on his undercard and win, then he would fight him. I believe he has ducked him because he's too dangerous, but here I am fighting Shannon Briggs now.
http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12 ... title-shot
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Mate, it's like trying to ask a dandelion to discuss philosophy, you're wasting your time. Either this person is......Dixonian wrote:Except the mighty Zumbano Love.asdfjkl wrote:Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?Dixonian wrote:
What has Briggs done except fight bums?
Briggs is very good at asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
A) Fukcin retarded
b) has jizz-stained posters of Briggs all over their cell
c) Is Shannon Briggs
d) Is Shannon Briggs' Mum, Dad, Auntie or other close relative.
e) Has Shannon Briggs hanging out their shitter as we speak.
Tick as appropriate.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Zumbano Love even stated Briggs is the hardest puncher he has ever been in the ring with, somehow he knew that beforehand and because of that tried to make Briggs tired instead of fighting him. Ofcourse he failed to win anyway and in fact Briggs easely won all rounds, that's how good Briggs his stamina was.Dixonian wrote:Except the mighty Zumbano Love.asdfjkl wrote:Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?Dixonian wrote:
What has Briggs done except fight bums?
Briggs is very good at asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
ZZZzzZZZzasdfjkl wrote:Zumbano Love even stated Briggs is the hardest puncher he has ever been in the ring with, somehow he knew that beforehand and because of that tried to make Briggs tired instead of fighting him. Ofcourse he failed to win anyway and in fact Briggs easely won all rounds, that's how good Briggs his stamina was.Dixonian wrote:Except the mighty Zumbano Love.asdfjkl wrote:
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Briggs is very good at asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
-
elephant man
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 104
- Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 13:00
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
So Haye doesn't deserve a title shot because he's fought "Two bums" yet 45 year old Shannon Briggs, who was hospitalised the last time he fought someone with something resembling talent six years ago, is fine? And then the winner having to face the utterly useless Fres Oquendo is also fine? The WBA is a joke 'title' basically the WBO of the 90s. A sham of an organisation. How are the likes of Oquendo and Briggs so highly ranked? Are their names picked out of a bingo machine or do they have incriminating photos of president Gilberto Mendoza?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Briggs because there's a reason guys like Haye and Wilder for example do everything they can to avoid him, Oquendo because he won something in court.elephant man wrote:So Haye doesn't deserve a title shot because he's fought "Two bums" yet 45 year old Shannon Briggs, who was hospitalised the last time he fought someone with something resembling talent six years ago, is fine? And then the winner having to face the utterly useless Fres Oquendo is also fine? The WBA is a joke 'title' basically the WBO of the 90s. A sham of an organisation. How are the likes of Oquendo and Briggs so highly ranked? Are their names picked out of a bingo machine or do they have incriminating photos of president Gilberto Mendoza?
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Mate, it's like trying to ask a dandelion to discuss philosophy, you're wasting your time. Either this person is......Dixonian wrote:Except the mighty Zumbano Love.asdfjkl wrote:
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Briggs is very good at asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
A) Fukcin retarded
b) has jizz-stained posters of Briggs all over their cell
c) Is Shannon Briggs
d) Is Shannon Briggs' Mum, Dad, Auntie or other close relative.
e) Has Shannon Briggs hanging out their shitter as we speak.
Tick as appropriate.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
It was for the secondary WBA belt mate. Browne v Briggs for even that husk of a belt doesn't look right to me. I get you're Australian and sticking up for your man but Browne and Briggs aren't anywhere near the elite of the heavyweight division and shouldn't even be fighting for the WBA secondary title. I'm a Scot and we have a similar situation with Ricky Burns holding the same WBA belt at 140. It's a joke and nobody really sees him as a legitimate world champion and it'll be the same with the Browne v Briggs winner. Don't get me wrong I like Browne he comes across a decent bloke and is fun to watch but is he elite at heavy? Not for me.Like a Boss wrote:Browne's last WAS for the titleStuarty30 wrote:Browne, Briggs and Haye haven't done enough between them recently to merit a world title shot! It's the WBA regular so it's a very lightly regarded diluted version of a world title.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Mate, it's like trying to ask a dandelion to discuss philosophy, you're wasting your time. Either this person is......Dixonian wrote:Except the mighty Zumbano Love.asdfjkl wrote:
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Briggs is very good at asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
A) Fukcin retarded
b) has jizz-stained posters of Briggs all over their cell
c) Is Shannon Briggs
d) Is Shannon Briggs' Mum, Dad, Auntie or other close relative.
e) Has Shannon Briggs hanging out their shitter as we speak.
Tick as appropriate.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
Burns the real WBA champion mate. No WBA super champion in that division.Stuarty30 wrote:It was for the secondary WBA belt mate. Browne v Briggs for even that husk of a belt doesn't look right to me. I get you're Australian and sticking up for your man but Browne and Briggs aren't anywhere near the elite of the heavyweight division and shouldn't even be fighting for the WBA secondary title. I'm a Scot and we have a similar situation with Ricky Burns holding the same WBA belt at 140. It's a joke and nobody really sees him as a legitimate world champion and it'll be the same with the Browne v Briggs winner. Don't get me wrong I like Browne he comes across a decent bloke and is fun to watch but is he elite at heavy? Not for me.Like a Boss wrote:Browne's last WAS for the titleStuarty30 wrote:Browne, Briggs and Haye haven't done enough between them recently to merit a world title shot! It's the WBA regular so it's a very lightly regarded diluted version of a world title.
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
My bad but it's the WBA lol. They're gonna end up about as relevant as the WBU the rate they're going. I don't mean any disrespect to Burns or Browne but the WBA are a shambles of an organisation.PredatorHayds wrote:Burns the real WBA champion mate. No WBA super champion in that division.Stuarty30 wrote:It was for the secondary WBA belt mate. Browne v Briggs for even that husk of a belt doesn't look right to me. I get you're Australian and sticking up for your man but Browne and Briggs aren't anywhere near the elite of the heavyweight division and shouldn't even be fighting for the WBA secondary title. I'm a Scot and we have a similar situation with Ricky Burns holding the same WBA belt at 140. It's a joke and nobody really sees him as a legitimate world champion and it'll be the same with the Browne v Briggs winner. Don't get me wrong I like Browne he comes across a decent bloke and is fun to watch but is he elite at heavy? Not for me.Like a Boss wrote:
Browne's last WAS for the title
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9025
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot, but Shannon Briggs does?
What twisted logic did Browne use to come to that ridiculous conclusion?
Yes, Haye hasn't fought a true quality opponent in five years & he was embarrassing when he did, plus he was inactive for 3.5 years of that time, but when was the last time Briggs fought someone with a pulse?
The fact is, neither Haye nor Briggs deserve any type of title shot.
This just sums up how dire the HW division is in 2016.
The sooner the book closes on this year, the better, as far as HW boxing is concerned.
It has to be the most fallow year in modern HW history.
![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
What twisted logic did Browne use to come to that ridiculous conclusion?
Yes, Haye hasn't fought a true quality opponent in five years & he was embarrassing when he did, plus he was inactive for 3.5 years of that time, but when was the last time Briggs fought someone with a pulse?
The fact is, neither Haye nor Briggs deserve any type of title shot.
This just sums up how dire the HW division is in 2016.
The sooner the book closes on this year, the better, as far as HW boxing is concerned.
It has to be the most fallow year in modern HW history.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
People getting title shots based on a catchphrase is where heavyweight boxing currently sits!
There you go Price. That's your route to a title shot. Beats up journeymen and "stalks" the top fighters. Easy enough surely? 'Lets go champ!'
Terrible, terrible, terrible fight.
There you go Price. That's your route to a title shot. Beats up journeymen and "stalks" the top fighters. Easy enough surely? 'Lets go champ!'
Terrible, terrible, terrible fight.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
It's clear nobody dares to face Briggs and everybody dares to face Daffy, so saying Briggs deserves the titleshot more makes sense.Syntax Error wrote:David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot, but Shannon Briggs does?![]()
![]()
What twisted logic did Browne use to come to that ridiculous conclusion?
Yes, Haye hasn't fought a true quality opponent in five years & he was embarrassing when he did, plus he was inactive for 3.5 years of that time, but when was the last time Briggs fought someone with a pulse?
The fact is, neither Haye nor Briggs deserve any type of title shot.
This just sums up how dire the HW division is in 2016.
The sooner the book closes on this year, the better, as far as HW boxing is concerned.
It has to be the most fallow year in modern HW history.![]()
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: "David Haye doesn't deserve a title shot" - Lucas Browne
You might be onto something here. It would explain why he's also completely obsessed with Wilder to worrying depths.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Mate, it's like trying to ask a dandelion to discuss philosophy, you're wasting your time. Either this person is......Dixonian wrote:Except the mighty Zumbano Love.asdfjkl wrote:
Asking everyone who's not a bum for a fight, but nobody dared. So what else can he do then round 1 KO everyone who does dare to show up?
Briggs is very good at asking people for fights but the truth is he's only looking for a title shot or a big pay day via the easiest possible route. He won't take any risks.
A) Fukcin retarded
b) has jizz-stained posters of Briggs all over their cell
c) Is Shannon Briggs
d) Is Shannon Briggs' Mum, Dad, Auntie or other close relative.
e) Has Shannon Briggs hanging out their shitter as we speak.
Tick as appropriate.