Mate come on. You really think he would take the fight for 50k.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Briggs would have done well to get 10% of that.Killer Blow wrote:Haye earnt 1m. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/da ... ay-8024626fizzjambo wrote:
500k - you have no idea what you are on about!
Haye will have been lucky to clear that. Briggs got publicity and maybe just six figures at a push but I doubt it. £50k I'd say tbh
I'd say 50k is a good guess. Why would anybody pay him more?
David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.jamesmcdonnell wrote:the burden of proof isn't with us, it's on you, prove he didn't receive a penny.asdfjkl wrote:Proof me wrong, if you succeed Briggs will be a proven lier.Counter-puncher wrote:
Sadly... Everybody who knows what he's talking about, knows you can't.
Why would Briggs have agreed to fight for free? He really must have taken serious licks to his head to do that.
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
There is a reason the "Hayeday" undercards were so underwhelming. Haye's unlikely to be throwing six figures at supporting bouts, if it would impact on his take-home.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
He took the fight for free, just the promise that Haye would fight him next. Both accepted but at the end lier/coward Haye realised Briggs was too good and refused to face him anyway.Killer Blow wrote:Mate come on. You really think he would take the fight for 50k.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Briggs would have done well to get 10% of that.Killer Blow wrote:
Haye earnt 1m. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/da ... ay-8024626
I'd say 50k is a good guess. Why would anybody pay him more?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
How can I proof he didn't receive a penny? He didn't, he really didn't, exactly like he stated. If he did, it could probably easely been proven, but he didn't. If he didn't, then how could that possibly be proven?jamesmcdonnell wrote:the burden of proof isn't with us, it's on you, prove he didn't receive a penny.asdfjkl wrote:Proof me wrong, if you succeed Briggs will be a proven lier.Counter-puncher wrote:
Sadly... Everybody who knows what he's talking about, knows you can't.
Why would Briggs have agreed to fight for free? He really must have taken serious licks to his head to do that.
I can't proof I never kissed your mum either, I haven't, I really haven't, but how can I possibly proof that?
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.keithmoonhangover wrote:Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.jamesmcdonnell wrote:the burden of proof isn't with us, it's on you, prove he didn't receive a penny.asdfjkl wrote: Proof me wrong, if you succeed Briggs will be a proven lier.
Sadly... Everybody who knows what he's talking about, knows you can't.
Why would Briggs have agreed to fight for free? He really must have taken serious licks to his head to do that.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
Did you or did you not post this?Killer Blow wrote:I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.keithmoonhangover wrote:
Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.
Stop talking Shite. Briggs got paid nearly 7 figures for fighting on Haye's undercard.
-
boxingknockout
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
7 figures!?keithmoonhangover wrote:Did you or did you not post this?Killer Blow wrote:I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.keithmoonhangover wrote:
Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.![]()
Stop talking Shite. Briggs got paid nearly 7 figures for fighting on Haye's undercard.
Oh maybe you meant Zimbabwean dollars
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
The thing is, when someone is this deluded it's a waste of time discussing anything. I've had several Briggs related back and forths with him. At the end of the day why bother? I've nowt against Briggs and I know the world if full of delusional eejits who cannae back down on a point so what's in it for me? We all know Briggs will put up a 'watch through the hands' type performance if he takes a meaningful fight at this stage in his advanced life. I hope he doesn't for his own health but it'll hardly be boxing first, or last, car crashkeithmoonhangover wrote:What a load of tosh.asdfjkl wrote:I repeat, Briggs never received a penny, David Haye took all the money to himself.
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
Your posts in this thread seem to be a determined effort to prove otherwise. You'rd only fortunate that a proper wako is posting even more impressive filthKiller Blow wrote:I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.keithmoonhangover wrote:Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.jamesmcdonnell wrote:
the burden of proof isn't with us, it's on you, prove he didn't receive a penny.
Why would Briggs have agreed to fight for free? He really must have taken serious licks to his head to do that.
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
By nearly I meant half a million. I don't post blind nonsense like Jekyll does.keithmoonhangover wrote:Did you or did you not post this?Killer Blow wrote:I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.keithmoonhangover wrote:
Never a dull moment on here mate. One guy thinks Briggs got a million quid, the other one thinks he got zero.![]()
Stop talking Shite. Briggs got paid nearly 7 figures for fighting on Haye's undercard.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
I'll admit it, you present a solid, thoughtful, rational arguement. Now that you have my full attention I'd be intrigued if you could provide your views on the following:asdfjkl wrote:How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.
*The twin towers collapse
*The Philadelphia experiment
*Nessie
*Creationism
I look forward to your enlightening views on the above
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
That's not nearly. That's half.Killer Blow wrote:By nearly I meant half a million. I don't post blind nonsense like Jekyll does.keithmoonhangover wrote:Did you or did you not post this?Killer Blow wrote:
I said half a million. I'm not an idiot.![]()
Stop talking Shite. Briggs got paid nearly 7 figures for fighting on Haye's undercard.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
Briggs didn't fight for nowt. It was close to six figures from what I hear.asdfjkl wrote:How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
Fighting bellews in February.
I personally can't wait..
Eddie confirmed it in an interview with Kugan..
Super fight
I personally can't wait..
Eddie confirmed it in an interview with Kugan..
Super fight
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
Bullshitstory, Briggs fought for free, not even 1 figure and neither behind the ,keithmoonhangover wrote:Briggs didn't fight for nowt. It was close to six figures from what I hear.asdfjkl wrote:How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
I don't think there has ever been a pro boxer in this country who has stepped in the ring knowing that regardless of the result, he would not receive a penny. Listen to yourself man.asdfjkl wrote:Bullshitstory, Briggs fought for free, not even 1 figure and neither behind the ,keithmoonhangover wrote:Briggs didn't fight for nowt. It was close to six figures from what I hear.asdfjkl wrote:How retarded are you guys? He did it for free, assuming Daffy would fight him soon after. Briggs already said he fought for free, why would he lie if Haye could easely proof him wrong if Haye actually payed a dime? Haye would love to proof Briggs to be a lier, but he can't, because Briggs didn't and because Haye himself does all the time.
OK, let me just ask. What makes you think Briggs didn't get paid a single penny?
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiotkeithmoonhangover wrote:I don't think there has ever been a pro boxer in this country who has stepped in the ring knowing that regardless of the result, he would not receive a penny. Listen to yourself man.asdfjkl wrote:Bullshitstory, Briggs fought for free, not even 1 figure and neither behind the ,keithmoonhangover wrote:
Briggs didn't fight for nowt. It was close to six figures from what I hear.
OK, let me just ask. What makes you think Briggs didn't get paid a single penny?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
fizzjambo wrote:I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiotkeithmoonhangover wrote:I don't think there has ever been a pro boxer in this country who has stepped in the ring knowing that regardless of the result, he would not receive a penny. Listen to yourself man.asdfjkl wrote: Bullshitstory, Briggs fought for free, not even 1 figure and neither behind the ,
OK, let me just ask. What makes you think Briggs didn't get paid a single penny?
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
Show us YOUR proof.asdfjkl wrote:Proof me wrong, if you succeed Briggs will be a proven lier.Counter-puncher wrote:asdfjkl wrote:I repeat, Briggs never received a penny, David Haye took all the money to himself.
Sadly... Everybody who knows what he's talking about, knows you can't.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
https://twitter.com/thecannonbriggs/sta ... 1616135168 it's really not that hard, with google you can find it back in no time.keithmoonhangover wrote:fizzjambo wrote:I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiotkeithmoonhangover wrote:
I don't think there has ever been a pro boxer in this country who has stepped in the ring knowing that regardless of the result, he would not receive a penny. Listen to yourself man.
OK, let me just ask. What makes you think Briggs didn't get paid a single penny?You win mate.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
The BBBofC would be investigating Haye if he really didn't get paid. Nonsense.asdfjkl wrote:https://twitter.com/thecannonbriggs/sta ... 1616135168 it's really not that hard, with google you can find it back in no time.keithmoonhangover wrote:fizzjambo wrote:
I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiotYou win mate.
-
Controversial
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9221
- Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
Briggs will say and do anything to get a big money fight, he's a social media junky whose only mission is to get one last big pay cheque. Just because he tweeted it doesn't make it true.asdfjkl wrote:https://twitter.com/thecannonbriggs/sta ... 1616135168 it's really not that hard, with google you can find it back in no time.keithmoonhangover wrote:fizzjambo wrote:
I'll take this one..................it's because he's a fu*king idiotYou win mate.
-
the_doctor
- Welterweight
- Posts: 398
- Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08
Re: David Haye vs. ??? - December 10th 2016
If there is/was a contract in place that forced Haye to fight Briggs one of two things would have happened;Controversial wrote:Briggs will say and do anything to get a big money fight, he's a social media junky whose only mission is to get one last big pay cheque. Just because he tweeted it doesn't make it true.asdfjkl wrote:https://twitter.com/thecannonbriggs/sta ... 1616135168 it's really not that hard, with google you can find it back in no time.keithmoonhangover wrote:
You win mate.
1. Haye fights Briggs
2. Briggs sues Haye for loss of earnings (presumably six figures at least) due to breach of contract.
Come on, think about it, if there was a legally binding contract in place and Haye just ignored it, costing Briggs a massive pay day, you think all he'd do is moan in Twitter? He's American, those guys love a lawsuit!