Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by daviddee »

#AndTheNew
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by rio »

Just heard Clark is fighting ward next for the British. If this is true it's a disgrace. Nothing against Ronnie but cacace deserves the shot as he ko'd Ronnie in an eliminator. You have to think ward/hearn gave Ronnie the fight due to being the easier opponent. You have to feel for anto who apparently was willing to accept the fight even at late notice. Somehow maxi hughes has now been made mandatory meaning anto may never get his shot
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by Londonirish »

daviddee wrote:#AndTheNew


The best man will win and I see that being Ward styles makes fight and Ronnie is perfect for Ward to look Good.


rio wrote: You have to think ward/hearn gave Ronnie the fight due to being the easier opponent.


Your Right it's boxing tho, makes business Sense...
JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by JamieM »

Wrong mate. anto fought Ronnie for Celtic title. Wasn't an eliminator at all. After that fight Ronnie and maxi have both won eliminators which in your logic makes it right then?
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by maley1984 »

rio wrote:Just heard Clark is fighting ward next for the British. If this is true it's a disgrace. Nothing against Ronnie but cacace deserves the shot as he ko'd Ronnie in an eliminator. You have to think ward/hearn gave Ronnie the fight due to being the easier opponent. You have to feel for anto who apparently was willing to accept the fight even at late notice. Somehow maxi hughes has now been made mandatory meaning anto may never get his shot

It's a voluntary defence and Clark has a solid record. The reason cacace isn't mandatory is maxi won a eliminator and was put in a final eliminator against townend which didn't happen as townend boxed ward. Cacace was then put in a final eliminator against jupp who withdrew. The boards mistake. With maxi having won a eliminator he got the nod.
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by Fitzy901 »

I am sure Ward breathed a sigh of relief when he found out he doesn't have to box Cacace.
JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by JamieM »

Totally agree, I don't believe anyone wants anything to do with cacace. But I also believe he will not make the weight so it's irrelevant
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23226
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by handsofstone »

Excellent news,Mon the Shark :bag: :bag: :bag:
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by rio »

JamieM wrote:Wrong mate. anto fought Ronnie for Celtic title. Wasn't an eliminator at all. After that fight Ronnie and maxi have both won eliminators which in your logic makes it right then?
Logic is that anto has a ko win over Ronnie and it the Better fighter who deserves it more.
JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by JamieM »

And the logic is anto would not make superfeather on tht notice and also would be considered to dangerous for. Volontary. I agree he deserves a shot and when Ronnie wins trust me he will get it.
rio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 16:48

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by rio »

JamieM wrote:And the logic is anto would not make superfeather on tht notice and also would be considered to dangerous for. Volontary. I agree he deserves a shot and when Ronnie wins trust me he will get it.
Good luck Hope Ronnie wins.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by billy nelson »

Good luck to Ronnie in what is a very good fight
littlekinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 07:36

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by littlekinny »

Love these Ronnie Clarke threads :-P
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by maley1984 »

littlekinny wrote:Love these Ronnie Clarke threads :-P


Gunna go crazy if he beats Martin j ward.....
Fitzy901
Welterweight
Posts: 372
Joined: 15 Feb 2016, 14:12

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by Fitzy901 »

Ward is ducking Cacace for sure, but it's not Ronnies fault in the slightest.

In regards to the poster claiming it was a "disgrace" that Clarke was giving the opportunity, I do not understand how you come to that conclusion.

Yes Cacace stopped Clarke but it was a competitive fight and I would much rather see Ward in with a fit Clarke who boxrd on saturday rather than a Bowen on four weeks notice or Maxi Hughes for the third time.

I don't know if Ronnie punches as hard as Townend (probably not) but I believe he's a better boxer and is stronger with a better engine.

Whilst I think Ward will win the fight I still think it's intriguing.
Boxingcutsman
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 30 May 2012, 21:35

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by Boxingcutsman »

Absolutely great news, I spoke to Ronnie earlier, I'll be there with him to show my support. Ronnie is very very fit, physically strong, mentally strong and a very capable boxer, he also punches with fair enough power. I fancy ronnie to actually pull this off, I think most of the fights he has lost (inc Troy fight) he could of won if he had full proper camp with sparring, game plan etc, I told him that on the night and many times since, if he gets a good game plan in place for this fight it is well with in his grasp to win, he must also fight with his head and not his heart, he can't allow Ward to Fuk about early on and get into a rhythm, first 4-5 rounds are crucial, if Ronnie can make them nip and tuck and take something out of ward and his legs then Ronnie could even stop him later on has wards best rounds are always his early ones then he mentally shuts off and can fall apart a bit, I don't think he's got a 12 round gruelling fight in him like Ronnie has. Good luck the shark, finally got your chance mate.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by crusader »

I think Ward should take this pretty comfortably
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by daviddee »

Boxingcutsman wrote:Absolutely great news, I spoke to Ronnie earlier, I'll be there with him to show my support. Ronnie is very very fit, physically strong, mentally strong and a very capable boxer, he also punches with fair enough power. I fancy ronnie to actually pull this off, I think most of the fights he has lost (inc Troy fight) he could of won if he had full proper camp with sparring, game plan etc, I told him that on the night and many times since, if he gets a good game plan in place for this fight it is well with in his grasp to win, he must also fight with his head and not his heart, he can't allow Ward to Fuk about early on and get into a rhythm, first 4-5 rounds are crucial, if Ronnie can make them nip and tuck and take something out of ward and his legs then Ronnie could even stop him later on has wards best rounds are always his early ones then he mentally shuts off and can fall apart a bit, I don't think he's got a 12 round gruelling fight in him like Ronnie has. Good luck the shark, finally got your chance mate.
Very wise words Dean and a lot of honesty there not much of that in boxing. I see it pretty much the same as you. This is a 50/50 fight between 2 very good fighters. Ronnie has made Dundee proud he will be the first Dundonian to fight for a British Title and the first to win one.. We will bring the noise. And the New
DazDiCanio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 21 Apr 2013, 04:49

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by DazDiCanio »

daviddee wrote:Carl has been very disrespectful saying that Ronnie is scared to fight Sam. He also challenged Maxi Hughes. Ronnie was not handed straight eliminators or fights just because he asked on Twitter. Carl could of gone about it the right way and I'm sure if they are willing to come to Scotland this fight can maybe be made in the future. Sam firstly has to make weight. His lightest so far is 3lb over the Super Feather limit. He should maybe fight for a area title first.. You have Zelfa Barrett in a similar position and Andy Townend who is English Champion. No offence but Ronnie is looking to be in bigger title contention.
Great post. Well said Davie.

Greaves think's he's boxing royalty, when in reality.......
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by billy nelson »

In fairness Carl is doing great with his lads
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by maley1984 »

Shocked that the kid townend stopped in a couple has been passed to fight Bowen on the back of that defeat.
JamieM
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1342
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 18:06

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by JamieM »

Yeah the boy conwell. The problem is they have a budget but they wanna claim everyone is ducking the boy. The money has to be right as quite frankly he doesn't offer anything as of yet. Ronnie never did receive an official offer as far as we know .
Supremo
Super Middleweight
Posts: 698
Joined: 12 May 2013, 04:46

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by Supremo »

Why the fornicate are there continual threads on this board about this Ronnie Clark?
daviddee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1574
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 14:32

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by daviddee »

Supremo wrote:Why the eff are there continual threads on this board about this Ronnie Clark?
Because he's the best there is.. The best there was and the best there ever will be!!!
maley1984
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1773
Joined: 13 May 2010, 05:15

Re: Ronnie Clark v Sam Bowen??????

Post by maley1984 »

daviddee wrote:
Supremo wrote:Why the eff are there continual threads on this board about this Ronnie Clark?
Because he's the best there is.. The best there was and the best there ever will be!!!


That comment brings some memory's back lol.
Post Reply