Tanzio wrote:Krusher definitely lost the last round. Nobody got their ass kicked in that fight.Ricky_ wrote:ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
Kovalev got his ass kicked in that last round

Tanzio wrote:Krusher definitely lost the last round. Nobody got their ass kicked in that fight.Ricky_ wrote:ClivePatrickLyons wrote:
Kovalev got his ass kicked in that last round

You have obviously never had any experience with an ass kicking going in either direction, have you Ricky?Ricky_ wrote:Tanzio wrote:Krusher definitely lost the last round. Nobody got their ass kicked in that fight.Ricky_ wrote:
Ricky_ wrote:Tanzio wrote:Krusher definitely lost the last round. Nobody got their ass kicked in that fight.Ricky_ wrote:
Unbiased Expert wrote:Kovalev clearly dominated first 4 rounds and scored knockdown but after that Ward started land those bodyshots and outboxing Kovalev.
If you wanna talk about a robbery than look at those biased fake HBO scores - it was a total joke and even boxers like Garcia and many others laughed on that.
Many casual fans who never boxed in their lifes are fooled by one knockdown in second round.
Knockdown means 2 points = It is not auto win for the fighter !
Kovalev did great in early rounds but he gassed out badly and started being outsmarted and outboxed.
It was not some "hard" robbery".
It was very close fight and my scoring was https://postimg.org/image/xqaprnsmr/
Ward clearly won almost every round since round 5. He lost only 10th round , where Kovalev was more active and started doing some things.
Last two rounds were also for Andre Ward = body shots , better inside game , made Kovalev missing.
I ve already rewatched that fight more than 3 times.
Kovalev simply sold an easy fight for him. Stop crying about a robbery like kids.
IT WAS NOT A ROBBERY . Without that Knockdown Kovalev would win only 3 rounds !
You are just fooled by one knockdown and by early good perfomance.
Klitschko was dropped by Samuel Peter several times and still got that UD.
CG TO ANDRE WAR , got knocked down and still managet to wake up , outpoint his opponent while badly losing in early .
Ward does not deserve hate. It was not a robbery and i am sure that Ward will win rematch. He found how to beat Kovalev. He found his weakneses in late rounds.
This post is from unbiased white guy (for race supporters and racists)
Lay off the drugs pal or go get ur glasses checkedUnbiased Expert wrote:Kovalev clearly dominated first 4 rounds and scored knockdown but after that Ward started land those bodyshots and outboxing Kovalev.
If you wanna talk about a robbery than look at those biased fake HBO scores - it was a total joke and even boxers like Garcia and many others laughed on that.
Many casual fans who never boxed in their lifes are fooled by one knockdown in second round.
Knockdown means 2 points = It is not auto win for the fighter !
Kovalev did great in early rounds but he gassed out badly and started being outsmarted and outboxed.
It was not some "hard" robbery".
It was very close fight and my scoring was https://postimg.org/image/xqaprnsmr/
Ward clearly won almost every round since round 5. He lost only 10th round , where Kovalev was more active and started doing some things.
Last two rounds were also for Andre Ward = body shots , better inside game , made Kovalev missing.
I ve already rewatched that fight more than 3 times.
Kovalev simply sold an easy fight for him. Stop crying about a robbery like kids.
IT WAS NOT A ROBBERY . Without that Knockdown Kovalev would win only 3 rounds !
You are just fooled by one knockdown and by early good perfomance.
Klitschko was dropped by Samuel Peter several times and still got that UD.
CG TO ANDRE WAR , got knocked down and still managet to wake up , outpoint his opponent while badly losing in early .
Ward does not deserve hate. It was not a robbery and i am sure that Ward will win rematch. He found how to beat Kovalev. He found his weakneses in late rounds.
This post is from unbiased white guy (for race supporters and racists)
What the hell has racw got to do with it? Ffs im sick of hearin racist this or racist that,get a life will ya,ward lost that fight,ok it wasnt a robbery like sturm- de la hoya or pacquiao-bradley 1 but kov won that fight and for u to say ward won every round from round 5 is an absoulte joke,ward hugged his way to the final bell so if hugging is finding a way to beat someone then ur right,but ur not. Dont know what u got against white people or russiansUnbiased Expert wrote:Kovalev clearly dominated first 4 rounds and scored knockdown but after that Ward started land those bodyshots and outboxing Kovalev.
If you wanna talk about a robbery than look at those biased fake HBO scores - it was a total joke and even boxers like Garcia and many others laughed on that.
Many casual fans who never boxed in their lifes are fooled by one knockdown in second round.
Knockdown means 2 points = It is not auto win for the fighter !
Kovalev did great in early rounds but he gassed out badly and started being outsmarted and outboxed.
It was not some "hard" robbery".
It was very close fight and my scoring was https://postimg.org/image/xqaprnsmr/
Ward clearly won almost every round since round 5. He lost only 10th round , where Kovalev was more active and started doing some things.
Last two rounds were also for Andre Ward = body shots , better inside game , made Kovalev missing.
I ve already rewatched that fight more than 3 times.
Kovalev simply sold an easy fight for him. Stop crying about a robbery like kids.
IT WAS NOT A ROBBERY . Without that Knockdown Kovalev would win only 3 rounds !
You are just fooled by one knockdown and by early good perfomance.
Klitschko was dropped by Samuel Peter several times and still got that UD.
CG TO ANDRE WAR , got knocked down and still managet to wake up , outpoint his opponent while badly losing in early .
Ward does not deserve hate. It was not a robbery and i am sure that Ward will win rematch. He found how to beat Kovalev. He found his weakneses in late rounds.
This post is from unbiased white guy (for race supporters and racists)
No.The Insider wrote:No.
Yes.
No.
1 out of 3 aint bad.......
Horse wrote:No.The Insider wrote:No.
Yes.
No.
1 out of 3 aint bad.......
There is no unwritten rule. That is a myth. If it goes to a decision, he who accumulated the most points wins, belts or no belts.Cent0089 wrote:It was always been unwritten rule, if you wanna belts, you must beat the champion clearly. Kovalev collect the belts against some top oponents, fought before hostile crowd in UK and Canada (sometimes in US) and now Ward take these belts with going backwards, landing some weak jabs and hugging and gets knocked down. It was close fight but still a robbery IMO
Yes but kov won the fight,done more damage thrw more punches landed more punches forced the fight and only clinched wen ward started the clinching,it wasnt a close fight kov won convincingly imo,he won the first 5 took the 7th and 10thso how did ward rack up the most points?Tanzio wrote:There is no unwritten rule. That is a myth. If it goes to a decision, he who accumulated the most points wins, belts or no belts.Cent0089 wrote:It was always been unwritten rule, if you wanna belts, you must beat the champion clearly. Kovalev collect the belts against some top oponents, fought before hostile crowd in UK and Canada (sometimes in US) and now Ward take these belts with going backwards, landing some weak jabs and hugging and gets knocked down. It was close fight but still a robbery IMO
Krusher did not win the fight. Ward won more rounds, and outboxed, out jabbed, and out landed Krusher. But it was close and could have gone either way.thechump wrote:Yes but kov won the fight,done more damage thrw more punches landed more punches forced the fight and only clinched wen ward started the clinching,it wasnt a close fight kov won convincingly imo,he won the first 5 took the 7th and 10thso how did ward rack up the most points?Tanzio wrote:There is no unwritten rule. That is a myth. If it goes to a decision, he who accumulated the most points wins, belts or no belts.Cent0089 wrote:It was always been unwritten rule, if you wanna belts, you must beat the champion clearly. Kovalev collect the belts against some top oponents, fought before hostile crowd in UK and Canada (sometimes in US) and now Ward take these belts with going backwards, landing some weak jabs and hugging and gets knocked down. It was close fight but still a robbery IMO
We will have to agree to disagree then buddy,i dont think ward won at all and i dont think he out punched krusher or out landed himTanzio wrote:Krusher did not win the fight. Ward won more rounds, and outboxed, out jabbed, and out landed Krusher. But it was close and could have gone either way.thechump wrote:Yes but kov won the fight,done more damage thrw more punches landed more punches forced the fight and only clinched wen ward started the clinching,it wasnt a close fight kov won convincingly imo,he won the first 5 took the 7th and 10thso how did ward rack up the most points?Tanzio wrote: There is no unwritten rule. That is a myth. If it goes to a decision, he who accumulated the most points wins, belts or no belts.
The judges got it right, imo, whether they were legit, corrupt or inept.
Fair enough.thechump wrote:We will have to agree to disagree then buddy,i dont think ward won at all and i dont think he out punched krusher or out landed himTanzio wrote:Krusher did not win the fight. Ward won more rounds, and outboxed, out jabbed, and out landed Krusher. But it was close and could have gone either way.thechump wrote: Yes but kov won the fight,done more damage thrw more punches landed more punches forced the fight and only clinched wen ward started the clinching,it wasnt a close fight kov won convincingly imo,he won the first 5 took the 7th and 10thso how did ward rack up the most points?
The judges got it right, imo, whether they were legit, corrupt or inept.