Walters/Lomachenko

Impractical Poster
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Walters/Lomachenko

Post by Impractical Poster »

I have been looking forward to this fight since it was made. And more excited about this bout than I was Ward/Krusher.

Who you got and how?


I'm taking Walters. Of course Loma is hyped for good reason. But, I feel Walters' ability is getting overlooked. I believe he is going to be able to catch Loma on more occasions than most think and his power is going to be the deciding factor in this fight.

Walters by TKO mid to late rounds.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by Tanzio »

I think Lomachenko is too gifted and skilled for Walters. Walters could catch and hurt him enough to slow him down and stop him but Lomachenko by Ko is more likely.
Impractical Poster
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by Impractical Poster »

I think Walters' size will pose some issues for Loma. His jab is going to cause more problems than people think. Intriguing fight. Can't wait!
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by Tanzio »

Impractical Poster wrote:I think Walters' size will pose some issues for Loma. His jab is going to cause more problems than people think. Intriguing fight. Can't wait!
I have been looking forward to this one too. Nothing I would rather see than Walters catching Loma early (a la Krusher v Ward) and seeing how the Ukrainian can deal with it.
MaxiBoxc
Welterweight
Posts: 111
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 15:58

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by MaxiBoxc »

I think it must be more easy for Lomachenko than many people thinking. I like Walters, but Vasyl is the special one fighter.
jockpunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 524
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 16:20

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by jockpunk »

I think lomachenko is very good, but a bit overrated by some, especially max Kellerman. He has really not beaten anyone good. The only good fighter he has fought, he has lost to. Personally, I think walters would destroy salido.

Bottom line, tough fight for loma. I think he will pull it out, but I could see him getting caught and dropped before boxing his way to a close decision. I am going with loma 115-112.
JMac
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2308
Joined: 06 Sep 2007, 14:41

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by JMac »

Lomo on points. Should be a great fight.
DannyMCR
Welterweight
Posts: 784
Joined: 10 Jun 2016, 11:13

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by DannyMCR »

Lomachenko points for me. Very good, competitive fight, can't wait!
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by ValMar »

MaxiBoxc wrote:I think it must be more easy for Lomachenko than many people thinking. I like Walters, but Vasyl is the special one fighter.
Yes !
MaxiBoxc
Welterweight
Posts: 111
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 15:58

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by MaxiBoxc »

jockpunk wrote:I think lomachenko is very good, but a bit overrated by some, especially max Kellerman. He has really not beaten anyone good. The only good fighter he has fought, he has lost to. Personally, I think walters would destroy salido.

Bottom line, tough fight for loma. I think he will pull it out, but I could see him getting caught and dropped before boxing his way to a close decision. I am going with loma 115-112.
It just mean that you don't know much about Lomachenko, If you think that Vasyl overrated.
And he didn't lose to Salido. He was dirty robbed by the referee and by judges.
Badhusker
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by Badhusker »

MaxiBoxc wrote:
jockpunk wrote:I think lomachenko is very good, but a bit overrated by some, especially max Kellerman. He has really not beaten anyone good. The only good fighter he has fought, he has lost to. Personally, I think walters would destroy salido.

Bottom line, tough fight for loma. I think he will pull it out, but I could see him getting caught and dropped before boxing his way to a close decision. I am going with loma 115-112.
It just mean that you don't know much about Lomachenko, If you think that Vasyl overrated.
And he didn't lose to Salido. He was dirty robbed by the referee and by judges.



You must have missed the article when Lomo said the decision was fair and he blamed himself.
http://www.BS.com/lomachenko-s ... elf--75331

I think Lomo vs Walters will be a great fight, and lean towards Lomo by decision. Walters is better than Salido, but Lomo has improved a lot since then too.
MaxiBoxc
Welterweight
Posts: 111
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 15:58

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by MaxiBoxc »

Badhusker wrote:
MaxiBoxc wrote:
jockpunk wrote:I think lomachenko is very good, but a bit overrated by some, especially max Kellerman. He has really not beaten anyone good. The only good fighter he has fought, he has lost to. Personally, I think walters would destroy salido.

Bottom line, tough fight for loma. I think he will pull it out, but I could see him getting caught and dropped before boxing his way to a close decision. I am going with loma 115-112.
It just mean that you don't know much about Lomachenko, If you think that Vasyl overrated.
And he didn't lose to Salido. He was dirty robbed by the referee and by judges.



You must have missed the article when Lomo said the decision was fair and he blamed himself.
http://www.BS.com/lomachenko-s ... elf--75331

I think Lomo vs Walters will be a great fight, and lean towards Lomo by decision. Walters is better than Salido, but Lomo has improved a lot since then too.
I don't care what Vasyl said about this. I saw that fight and I told you about my opinion.

It wasn't a great fight, it was great robbery in onesided fight. I can't understand how somebody can compare that robbery with future great fight against Walters.
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3483
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by Cent0089 »

Lomachenko nickname should not be "Hi tech" but "Iron balls". Salido was sooo b!tch in that fight, but valuable learning experience of pro boxing for Vasyl. Walters is only threat in this division for Loma, other current champs will get slaughtered IMO :box:
Impractical Poster
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by Impractical Poster »

While Salido/Loma was a bit unfair, it doesn't negate the fact that Loma showed that he was having a very difficult time with the pressure of Salido. And I don't think that would have changed much even if Salido came in on weight.

Either way, Walters is going to be the bigger guy in there Saturday night. And he is much better than Salido. He also enjoys a much longer reach than Lomachenko. I know the Loma believers have a hard time believing that anyone can give him a hard time, but Walters has all the abilities to give Loma hell.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46344
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by gilgamesh »

It's a 50/50 fight to me. I'm picking Walters by KO, but nothing will surprise me.
MaxiBoxc
Welterweight
Posts: 111
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 15:58

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by MaxiBoxc »

Cent0089 wrote:Lomachenko nickname should not be "Hi tech" but "Iron balls". Salido was sooo b!tch in that fight, but valuable learning experience of pro boxing for Vasyl. Walters is only threat in this division for Loma, other current champs will get slaughtered IMO :box:
You are right! :clap:
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Scrolling through Boxrec ...
Lomachenko is god.
Kovalev is god.
GGG is god.

They can't lose, event though two of them has lost.

Great fight. Lomachenko will have to be defensive, and move.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46344
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by gilgamesh »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Scrolling through Boxrec ...
Lomachenko is god.
Kovalev is god.
GGG is god.

They can't lose, event though two of them has lost.

Great fight. Lomachenko will have to be defensive, and move.
Kovalev didn't lose. 3 judges said he did while at least 60% of Boxing fans and pundits said he didn't. The majority don't see him as the loser of that fight.

Lomachenko did though, and may well lose again this weekend. We'll see.
MaxiBoxc
Welterweight
Posts: 111
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 15:58

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by MaxiBoxc »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Scrolling through Boxrec ...
Lomachenko is god.
Kovalev is god.
GGG is god.

They can't lose, event though two of them has lost.
Both were robbed. But only Kovalev was robbed in close fight.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

gilgamesh wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Scrolling through Boxrec ...
Lomachenko is god.
Kovalev is god.
GGG is god.

They can't lose, event though two of them has lost.

Great fight. Lomachenko will have to be defensive, and move.
Kovalev didn't lose. 3 judges said he did while at least 60% of Boxing fans and pundits said he didn't. The majority don't see him as the loser of that fight.

Lomachenko did though, and may well lose again this weekend. We'll see.
Ha, you are willing to accept Lomachenko's loss, which was one of the most absurd fights ever,
yet, Kovalev losing a close fight to Ward is unbearable.

The hate of Ward is widespread throughout the boxing world.
This is a fight he could have lost, so you guys are making a bigger deal than you should.

Similar to idiots who say Maidana beat Floyd in the first fight.
It's hard to take your opinions on boxing scoring seriously.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46344
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by gilgamesh »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Scrolling through Boxrec ...
Lomachenko is god.
Kovalev is god.
GGG is god.

They can't lose, event though two of them has lost.

Great fight. Lomachenko will have to be defensive, and move.
Kovalev didn't lose. 3 judges said he did while at least 60% of Boxing fans and pundits said he didn't. The majority don't see him as the loser of that fight.

Lomachenko did though, and may well lose again this weekend. We'll see.
Ha, you are willing to accept Lomachenko's loss, which was one of the most absurd fights ever,
yet, Kovalev losing a close fight to Ward is unbearable.

The hate of Ward is widespread throughout the boxing world.
This is a fight he could have lost, so you guys are making a bigger deal than you should.

Similar to idiots who say Maidana beat Floyd in the first fight.
It's hard to take your opinions on boxing scoring seriously.
I didn't say it was unbearable. I've never even called it a robbery. I've seen worse robberies than that certainly, but that doesn't mean Ward won. He didn't.

I don't care if you don't take my opinion on Boxing Scorecards seriously or not. I'm a serious Boxing fan who watches very intently and closely when fights are on, and my scores are always justifiable. You'd never be able to point to any of my scorecards that are ridiculously off the mark.

You're welcome to disagree with my scoring. After all that's part of the fun of forums. The debate, but my integrity and why I score the way I do cannot be called into question.

My like or dislike of a fighter does not affect my scoring in the slightest. I call it like I see it, and the way I saw it Saturday Night was a Kovalev victory.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by Kalan »

gilgamesh wrote:
BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Kovalev didn't lose. 3 judges said he did while at least 60% of Boxing fans and pundits said he didn't. The majority don't see him as the loser of that fight.

Lomachenko did though, and may well lose again this weekend. We'll see.
Ha, you are willing to accept Lomachenko's loss, which was one of the most absurd fights ever,
yet, Kovalev losing a close fight to Ward is unbearable.

The hate of Ward is widespread throughout the boxing world.
This is a fight he could have lost, so you guys are making a bigger deal than you should.

Similar to idiots who say Maidana beat Floyd in the first fight.
It's hard to take your opinions on boxing scoring seriously.
I didn't say it was unbearable. I've never even called it a robbery. I've seen worse robberies than that certainly, but that doesn't mean Ward won. He didn't.

I don't care if you don't take my opinion on Boxing Scorecards seriously or not. I'm a serious Boxing fan who watches very intently and closely when fights are on, and my scores are always justifiable. You'd never be able to point to any of my scorecards that are ridiculously off the mark.

You're welcome to disagree with my scoring. After all that's part of the fun of forums. The debate, but my integrity and why I score the way I do cannot be called into question.

My like or dislike of a fighter does not affect my scoring in the slightest. I call it like I see it, and the way I saw it Saturday Night was a Kovalev victory.
Here my take on Lomachenko... He beat Salido by a mile on clean effective punches and had him out in the 12th.. He should have been awarded at least 5 more points for heading and low blow fouls, so that was a horrendous robbery. Walters is a great boxer-puncher. As I've said for years he's extremely skilled and one of the greatest Featherweights ever.. He completely dominated all 27 of his professional opponents to date, and some of them were very good.. If the judges get it correct this time Lomachenko will probably win, although it could be close... Loma is giving up a ton of height, reach, and power, but he's one of the most skilled boxers who ever laced up the gloves.. He'd probably beat Willie Pep.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by diddy »

gilgamesh wrote:It's a 50/50 fight to me. I'm picking Walters by KO, but nothing will surprise me.
It's nowhere near 50-50. Lomo is a -900 favorite.
diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by diddy »

Walters is good but made his name beating the corpse of Donaire and Darchinyan. He was fought tooth and nail by Jason Sosa, who is NO Vasyl. Walters has the reach but these guys are essentially the same damn height. This isn't Salido weighing 160 lbs in there.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46344
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Walters/Lomachenko

Post by gilgamesh »

diddy wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:It's a 50/50 fight to me. I'm picking Walters by KO, but nothing will surprise me.
It's nowhere near 50-50. Lomo is a -900 favorite.
Betting odds can be a bit ridiculous sometimes.
Post Reply