That's because you are Tanzidiot.Tanzio wrote:Round 10 was not any clearer than any of the other rounds in the entire fight,imo. It was less clear than a number of them though.
Round 10: Ward v Kovalev
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Round 10: Ward v Kovalev
Re: Round 10: Ward v Kovalev
Oh that just crushed my delicate ego. Stop, you're so insensitiveboxing_rocks wrote:That's because you are Tanzidiot.Tanzio wrote:Round 10 was not any clearer than any of the other rounds in the entire fight,imo. It was less clear than a number of them though.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Round 10: Ward v Kovalev
The "73%" statistic you quote does not represent reality since it was only based on a sample size of sixty media scores, not the entire population (i.e. calculated from all the media scores in existence).crow wrote:This unanimous agreement by 8 out of 8 that Kovalev didn't win is suspicious as hell, since 73% of boxing experts gave Kovalev the win.Enlightened-One wrote:
In terms of the overall scoring from the UK Sky Sports team:
* Paulie Malignaggi = 116-112 to Ward
* Matthew Macklin = 115-113 to Ward
* Spencer Fearon = 115-113 to Ward
* Paul Smith by three points to Ward
* Tony Bellew & Johnny Nelson 114-114 a draw
* Adam Smith = 114-113 to Ward
* Eddie Hearn = 114-113 to Ward
On the other hand, if Kovalev was English, these hacks would be screaming bloody murder for 6 months.
I’m supremely confident that I could carefully produce my own list of media scores, approaching or perhaps even exceeding sixty journalistic opinions, to dishonestly justify a claim that 73% of the media actually believed that Ward won.
Unfortunately, that’s the nature of statistics… their accuracy depends on how big the sample they’re supposed to reflect.
Last edited by Enlightened-One on 25 Nov 2016, 14:01, edited 1 time in total.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Round 10: Ward v Kovalev
Tanzio wrote:crow wrote:This unanimous agreement by 8 out of 8 that Kovalev didn't win is suspicious as hell, since 73% of boxing experts gave Kovalev the win.Enlightened-One wrote:
In terms of the overall scoring from the UK Sky Sports team:
* Paulie Malignaggi = 116-112 to Ward
* Matthew Macklin = 115-113 to Ward
* Spencer Fearon = 115-113 to Ward
* Paul Smith by three points to Ward
* Tony Bellew & Johnny Nelson 114-114 a draw
* Adam Smith = 114-113 to Ward
* Eddie Hearn = 114-113 to Ward
On the other hand, if Kovalev was English, these hacks would be screaming bloody murder for 6 months.no doubt indoubtable evidence that the Sky crew was turned by the Illuminati or Bilderburg Group or (cue the dun dun duuuuun! music) the Rothschilds' managing lizard herself!!