What do you think your doing... . .? Coming here with your sense and reasonLike a Boss wrote:Two things to consider :Rob3_142 wrote:
I don't understand how so many people had Takam winning that fight. It wasn't like Parker won by 10+ rounds, but definitely clear by 2-3 rounds. I always felt he was in complete control, and when Takam was finding any kind of momentum, he'd take his foot off the gas.
I mean the volume of people that think Takam won the fight makes me question my judgement, or maybe that's just people gunning for the underdog?
1/ Fights are hard to score. That's why even the qualified judges entrusted with scoring a fight rarely manage to agree on who won particular rounds, let alone who won the fight.
2/ When you are watching a fighter you really hope wins it is even harder to score a fight.
There is a argument for takam.. I went Parker by 2-3 I seem to remember .
