Price v Hammer

Who wins ?

1- Price
24
43%
2- Hammer
32
57%
 
Total votes: 56

Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Horse wrote:
lillywhite14 wrote:A win over Hammer won't bring Price a fight with Joshua. Unless Joshua loses to Wlad.
If Joshua beats Wlad he'll be looking at Pulev then I suspect it'll be Wilder/WBC champ for the unification.
Super Joshua only fights the best!

Joshua's previous track record should be totally dismissed because he's scheduled to fight Wlad.
When Josh crushes Wlad, his previous opponents should be dismissed, just as Fury's weak opposition pre Wlad was dismissed when Tyson beat Wlad :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Horse »

Riddick Blowe wrote:You're the monkey, Horse. Hammer may or may not be top 10. It really doesn't matter. He sucks.
So Price might as well continue to fight the likes of Pejsar & Perkovic instead of fighting someone like Hammer then?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Horse »

Riddick Blowe wrote:When Josh crushes Wlad, his previous opponents should be dismissed, just as Fury's weak opposition pre Wlad was dismissed when Tyson beat Wlad :TU:
Tyson Fury's pre-Wlad record was a heck of a lot better than Joshua's is.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Horse wrote:So Price might as well continue to fight the likes of Pejsar & Perkovic instead of fighting someone like Hammer then?
I think Price is getting knocked out, not because Hammer is 'highly ranked' but just because he is a bit less bad than Price in my opinion. But Price has to fight someone, right? They chose someone who is 'ranked' and credible on a relational basis, not an absolute one, and someone without a punch. It's still not going to work out for Pricey.
Horse wrote:Tyson Fury's pre-Wlad record was a heck of a lot better than Joshua's is.
May have been marginally better. Not to any meaningful degree.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Rob3_142 »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
Horse wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:My point was, fighters who aren't very good manage to make it into the top 10 just because they suck slightly less than those someone ranked below them.

It doesn't always require the top guys beating these clowns in order to make a judgment. I have eyes.

Not sure how many more times we can have the same argument, but it sure is fun.
You have fun when making a monkey of yourself?
You're the monkey, Horse. Hammer may or may not be top 10. It really doesn't matter. He sucks.
I thought Horse was a Horse?
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Rob3_142 wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
Horse wrote:You have fun when making a monkey of yourself?
You're the monkey, Horse. Hammer may or may not be top 10. It really doesn't matter. He sucks.
I thought Horse was a Horse?
He's both horsing and monkeying around!
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Rob3_142 »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
Rob3_142 wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
You're the monkey, Horse. Hammer may or may not be top 10. It really doesn't matter. He sucks.
I thought Horse was a Horse?
He's both horsing and monkeying around!
:TU:
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by lillywhite14 »

Imagine the pain in the horse household if Joshua comes through Wlad and then Pulev. I worry for him if the unthinkable does happen :TU:
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Rob3_142 »

It's okay Horse, we're all here for you when it happens.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by BitPlayer »

lillywhite14 wrote:Imagine the pain in the horse household if Joshua comes through Wlad and then Pulev. I worry for him if the unthinkable does happen :TU:
If he beat Wlad would anyone really expect Pulev to beat him?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Horse »

BitPlayer wrote:If he beat Wlad would anyone really expect Pulev to beat him?
He would have a good chance.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Rob3_142 »

Horse wrote:
BitPlayer wrote:If he beat Wlad would anyone really expect Pulev to beat him?
He would have a good chance.
:lol:
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

lillywhite14 wrote:Imagine the pain in the horse household if Joshua comes through Wlad and then Pulev. I worry for him if the unthinkable does happen :TU:
I would pay to see a documentary about 'the horse household'.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Rob3_142 »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
lillywhite14 wrote:Imagine the pain in the horse household if Joshua comes through Wlad and then Pulev. I worry for him if the unthinkable does happen :TU:
I would pay to see a documentary about 'the horse household'.
This. Maybe we should set up a fund? Horse how much would it cost?
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Crease »

Potentially a good fight. Pricey needs to show us his boxing skills, "opening up" isn't enough at the top level.
world ranked
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2199
Joined: 21 Jan 2008, 14:21

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by world ranked »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
world ranked wrote:
Horse wrote:Yes, it is.
:shame: why would it be. Hammer is a top euro level guy but no where near the top 7 of the division.
Malik Scott is in the top ten based on a win over a decrepit Tony Thompson.

I think this tells you everything you need to know about why some people need to stop obsessing about rankings in this division.
Top ten of what. I'm taking not them bogus sansaction bodies or even boxrec rankings. Its not obsessing we know these guys aren't the top of the division. Malik Scott isn't top 20 but like you said he beat a guy Price couldn't but somehow with a win he'd be a top 20 guy. :lol:
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Wales »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Ha'way Pricey, knock him oot. :bag: :OhYes:

Bit harsh that
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Wales »

Sorry, just read it properly. At first glance I thought you said ",Harvey Price would knock him out"
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16942
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Wales wrote:Sorry, just read it properly. At first glance I thought you said ",Harvey Price would knock him out"
:lol: :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Horse »

world ranked wrote:Malik Scott isn't top 20
Yes, he is.
world ranked wrote:but like you said he beat a guy Price couldn't but somehow with a win he'd be a top 20 guy. :lol:
What's funny about that?
Verdi
Welterweight
Posts: 819
Joined: 12 Apr 2016, 18:08

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Verdi »

Stick Price in with Briggs, that'd be fun.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

world ranked wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
world ranked wrote:
:shame: why would it be. Hammer is a top euro level guy but no where near the top 7 of the division.
Malik Scott is in the top ten based on a win over a decrepit Tony Thompson.

I think this tells you everything you need to know about why some people need to stop obsessing about rankings in this division.
Top ten of what. I'm taking not them bogus sansaction bodies or even boxrec rankings. Its not obsessing we know these guys aren't the top of the division. Malik Scott isn't top 20 but like you said he beat a guy Price couldn't but somehow with a win he'd be a top 20 guy. :lol:
wasn't referring to you.

The sad thing is Hammer and Scott maybe are top 10 or at least top 20 if we have to sort these guys. If we did a top 10 on absolute level of ability half of it should be vacant.
Rob3_142
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2791
Joined: 26 Jun 2015, 06:03

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by Rob3_142 »

world ranked wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
world ranked wrote:
:shame: why would it be. Hammer is a top euro level guy but no where near the top 7 of the division.
Malik Scott is in the top ten based on a win over a decrepit Tony Thompson.

I think this tells you everything you need to know about why some people need to stop obsessing about rankings in this division.
Top ten of what. I'm taking not them bogus sansaction bodies or even boxrec rankings. Its not obsessing we know these guys aren't the top of the division. Malik Scott isn't top 20 but like you said he beat a guy Price couldn't but somehow with a win he'd be a top 20 guy. :lol:
So just for kicks, who would make your top 10?
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5157
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by TheLeprechaun »

It will be a decent win for price but fury dominated and stopped hammer years ago.

Price will still be threading water after the fight. Nobody is going to voluntarily give him a shot at the title, too high risk. And he's not good enough to work his way into a mandatory position without getting sparked
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Price v Hammer

Post by lillywhite14 »

TheLeprechaun wrote:It will be a decent win for price but fury dominated and stopped hammer years ago.

Price will still be threading water after the fight. Nobody is going to voluntarily give him a shot at the title, too high risk. And he's not good enough to work his way into a mandatory position without getting sparked
People say too high risk but I'm not sure that's true. He doesn't bring a big fan base, he doesn't bring a name and as it stands, he brings no real credibility, not at that level anyway.

There's plenty of heavyweights around who offer more in them regards and as I originally said, he's not actually that high a risk. His much vaunted power saw old man Thompson get off the he canvas and come back and stop him. Perhaps his power isn't anything much beyond domestic level?
Post Reply