Wilder vs washington

stellar
Super Lightweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 19 Nov 2016, 07:00

Wilder vs washington

Post by stellar »

Good fight almoust
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by asdfjkl »

I would have prefered to see him against Wach for example, or Briggs, but at least it's better then Wawrich or whatever his name was.
Freedom2013
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3879
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by Freedom2013 »

Yes, at least he's better than Wawrzyk.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by dagilechia »

Freedom2013 wrote:Yes, at least he's better than Wawrzyk.
he's about the same level i think and this fight should show it. and Wawrzyk&Washington probably beats Wach now (Brazilian journeyman was robbed vs Wach not that much time ago) so i think Washington was the best choice (obviously better than Rudenko which was considered too)
ValMar
Welterweight
Posts: 4149
Joined: 07 Nov 2015, 14:24

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by ValMar »

If the next (after Washington) Wilder's opponent is Joshua/Klitschko/Ortiz/Haye/T. Fury/Parker - it is OK.
If not - :verysad:
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by montrealsuper »

ValMar wrote:If the next (after Washington) Wilder's opponent is Joshua/Klitschko/Ortiz/Haye/T. Fury/Parker - it is OK.
If not - :verysad:
Rubbish fake "fight" - a WWE exhibition choreograph - only a fool will watch the dive -
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7467
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by jujigatame »

Not too often a replacement fighter is better than the guy he's replacing.

Decent fight. Washington may actually be better than Duhaupas and Molina, whereas I'm pretty sure Wawrzyk is worse.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46515
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by gilgamesh »

Fight seems interesting on paper I doubt it turns out all that interesting in the ring. Washington seems to be able to take a shot pretty good, but he's slow and only has about 4 and a half rounds of stamina in the tank.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by Enlightened-One »

I’m sorry, but I just can’t endorse this fight.

I always try my upmost to be optimistic, by trying to find even the smallest hint of a silver lining in the largest of dark clouds, but I’ve miserably failed to discover anything positive about this contest.

Stylistically-speaking, Gerald Washington is simply awful! It's not a competitive bout.

Gerald Washington was only awarded a top-ten ranking by the WBC on the back of his victory over Ray Austin, an opponent that had lost three of only four contests he’d competed in over a span of almost seven years. Two months prior to facing Gerald Washington, Ray Austin lost his previous bout to Andy Ruiz Jr. by a fourth round stoppage.

Simply put: Gerald Washington hasn’t earned the right to be allowed to compete in a world title fight!

Deontay Wilder initially captured his WBC World heavyweight title on the 17th January, 2015, but he’s never been forced to engage in a mandatory defence of his title, which means that he’ll almost certainly be allowed to enjoy (at least) a 2½ championship reign without having faced any half-decent opposition.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46515
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by gilgamesh »

Enlightened-One wrote:I’m sorry, but I just can’t endorse this fight.

I always try my upmost to be optimistic, by trying to find even the smallest hint of a silver lining in the largest of dark clouds, but I’ve miserably failed to discover anything positive about this contest.

Stylistically-speaking, Gerald Washington is simply awful! It's not a competitive bout.

Gerald Washington was only awarded a top-ten ranking by the WBC on the back of his victory over Ray Austin, an opponent that had lost three of only four contests he’d competed in over a span of almost seven years. Two months prior to facing Gerald Washington, Ray Austin lost his previous bout to Andy Ruiz Jr. by a fourth round stoppage.

Simply put: Gerald Washington hasn’t earned the right to be allowed to compete in a world title fight!

Deontay Wilder initially captured his WBC World heavyweight title on the 17th January, 2015, but he’s never been forced to engage in a mandatory defence of his title, which means that he’ll almost certainly be allowed to enjoy (at least) a 2½ championship reign without having faced any half-decent opposition.
Wawryzk deserved a shot though?

Wilder fighting guys that aren't worthy of a title shot is the story of his entire title reign. You might as well get used to that sh*t because he'll still be doing it next year too.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by crusader »

Better than what was originally scheduled, though Washington being better than Wawrzyk doesn't somehow make this a good fight.

Washington has fought one decent opponent, someone who wasn't even top 15 themselves, and was fortunate to get a draw. His best win is over a shell of Eddie Chambers who didn't remotely try to win.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by Kalan »

Correct... Washington is big, stiff, slow, awkward, and has no weapons. At one time he looked like a fair prospect for the NFL, but failed to get drafted because of numerous injuries he suffered.. For me he's another Seth Mitchell except that his knees aren't as bad.. But his Boxing skills are even more undeveloped.. He's big and strong and he can hit, but he's not going to hit Wilder.

He should be matched with Dominic Breazeale, not Deontay Wilder. The world has gone mad with matchups like this. The Povetkin lawsuit is coming up this month versus Dibella and Wilder... Hopefully Wilder's shameful ass will be nailed to wall for everyone to see.
Impractical Poster
Middleweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by Impractical Poster »

Ya'll bitch about anything.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by Lackeos »

If Wilder fights a legit opponent 29 years from now, then I can let this slide.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by asdfjkl »

I was just wondering, if Wada/Vada once again have no option left but admitting Povetkin is 100% innocent, just like all other times this most tested boxer in the world has, shouldn't he replace Washington anyway?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by crusader »

Lackeos wrote:If Wilder fights a legit opponent 29 years from now, then I can let this slide.
:OhYes:
geronimo
Super Middleweight
Posts: 284
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 04:51

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by geronimo »

Another ridicolous fight for Wilder. Just a little bit less ridicolous than the other ones.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by Badhusker »

Who knows how good Washington really is yet, being undefeated, but if it is a mismatch it must mean Wilder is better than most here would like to admit. I understand because he is coming off two surgeries. If Wilder does not fight a legit top opponent after this, I will be 100% on the band wagon to call for him to be stripped.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by asdfjkl »

Badhusker wrote:Who knows how good Washington really is yet, being undefeated, but if it is a mismatch it must mean Wilder is better than most here would like to admit. I understand because he is coming off two surgeries. If Wilder does not fight a legit top opponent after this, I will be 100% on the band wagon to call for him to be stripped.
About as good as a 44 year old out of prime 6ft1 Amir Mansour, who already lost 1,5 year before against current cruiserweight Steve Cunningham.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by crusader »

Fortunate to get a draw against Mansour, in a hard fight with Aguilera......I don't think he's some hidden special talent.
Lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1083
Joined: 26 May 2002, 12:35

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by Lennox »

Washington is by far his worse defence yet, you are getting misled by the fact he is undefeated, there is a good reason he is undefeated. He has a punchers chance but will likely get knocked out.
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7467
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by jujigatame »

Lennox wrote:Washington is by far his worse defence yet, you are getting misled by the fact he is undefeated, there is a good reason he is undefeated. He has a punchers chance but will likely get knocked out.
By far? I don't think he's any worse than Arreola, Molina, or Duhaupas.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9457
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by tiny_acres »

jujigatame wrote:
Lennox wrote:Washington is by far his worse defence yet, you are getting misled by the fact he is undefeated, there is a good reason he is undefeated. He has a punchers chance but will likely get knocked out.
By far? I don't think he's any worse than Arreola, Molina, or Duhaupas.
I agree that they are all on the same level.
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7467
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Wilder vs washington

Post by jujigatame »

If we're considering how bad the challenger looked at the time the fight was made, I think Molina was the worst of the bunch. But Molina did go on to KO Adamek a year later so he looks better in hindsight.
Post Reply