Wilder vs washington
Wilder vs washington
Good fight almoust
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs washington
I would have prefered to see him against Wach for example, or Briggs, but at least it's better then Wawrich or whatever his name was.
-
Freedom2013
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 3879
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 11:35
Re: Wilder vs washington
Yes, at least he's better than Wawrzyk.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Wilder vs washington
he's about the same level i think and this fight should show it. and Wawrzyk&Washington probably beats Wach now (Brazilian journeyman was robbed vs Wach not that much time ago) so i think Washington was the best choice (obviously better than Rudenko which was considered too)Freedom2013 wrote:Yes, at least he's better than Wawrzyk.
Re: Wilder vs washington
If the next (after Washington) Wilder's opponent is Joshua/Klitschko/Ortiz/Haye/T. Fury/Parker - it is OK.
If not -![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
If not -
-
montrealsuper
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44
Re: Wilder vs washington
Rubbish fake "fight" - a WWE exhibition choreograph - only a fool will watch the dive -ValMar wrote:If the next (after Washington) Wilder's opponent is Joshua/Klitschko/Ortiz/Haye/T. Fury/Parker - it is OK.
If not -
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7467
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Wilder vs washington
Not too often a replacement fighter is better than the guy he's replacing.
Decent fight. Washington may actually be better than Duhaupas and Molina, whereas I'm pretty sure Wawrzyk is worse.
Decent fight. Washington may actually be better than Duhaupas and Molina, whereas I'm pretty sure Wawrzyk is worse.
Re: Wilder vs washington
Fight seems interesting on paper I doubt it turns out all that interesting in the ring. Washington seems to be able to take a shot pretty good, but he's slow and only has about 4 and a half rounds of stamina in the tank.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Wilder vs washington
I’m sorry, but I just can’t endorse this fight.
I always try my upmost to be optimistic, by trying to find even the smallest hint of a silver lining in the largest of dark clouds, but I’ve miserably failed to discover anything positive about this contest.
Stylistically-speaking, Gerald Washington is simply awful! It's not a competitive bout.
Gerald Washington was only awarded a top-ten ranking by the WBC on the back of his victory over Ray Austin, an opponent that had lost three of only four contests he’d competed in over a span of almost seven years. Two months prior to facing Gerald Washington, Ray Austin lost his previous bout to Andy Ruiz Jr. by a fourth round stoppage.
Simply put: Gerald Washington hasn’t earned the right to be allowed to compete in a world title fight!
Deontay Wilder initially captured his WBC World heavyweight title on the 17th January, 2015, but he’s never been forced to engage in a mandatory defence of his title, which means that he’ll almost certainly be allowed to enjoy (at least) a 2½ championship reign without having faced any half-decent opposition.
I always try my upmost to be optimistic, by trying to find even the smallest hint of a silver lining in the largest of dark clouds, but I’ve miserably failed to discover anything positive about this contest.
Stylistically-speaking, Gerald Washington is simply awful! It's not a competitive bout.
Gerald Washington was only awarded a top-ten ranking by the WBC on the back of his victory over Ray Austin, an opponent that had lost three of only four contests he’d competed in over a span of almost seven years. Two months prior to facing Gerald Washington, Ray Austin lost his previous bout to Andy Ruiz Jr. by a fourth round stoppage.
Simply put: Gerald Washington hasn’t earned the right to be allowed to compete in a world title fight!
Deontay Wilder initially captured his WBC World heavyweight title on the 17th January, 2015, but he’s never been forced to engage in a mandatory defence of his title, which means that he’ll almost certainly be allowed to enjoy (at least) a 2½ championship reign without having faced any half-decent opposition.
Re: Wilder vs washington
Wawryzk deserved a shot though?Enlightened-One wrote:I’m sorry, but I just can’t endorse this fight.
I always try my upmost to be optimistic, by trying to find even the smallest hint of a silver lining in the largest of dark clouds, but I’ve miserably failed to discover anything positive about this contest.
Stylistically-speaking, Gerald Washington is simply awful! It's not a competitive bout.
Gerald Washington was only awarded a top-ten ranking by the WBC on the back of his victory over Ray Austin, an opponent that had lost three of only four contests he’d competed in over a span of almost seven years. Two months prior to facing Gerald Washington, Ray Austin lost his previous bout to Andy Ruiz Jr. by a fourth round stoppage.
Simply put: Gerald Washington hasn’t earned the right to be allowed to compete in a world title fight!
Deontay Wilder initially captured his WBC World heavyweight title on the 17th January, 2015, but he’s never been forced to engage in a mandatory defence of his title, which means that he’ll almost certainly be allowed to enjoy (at least) a 2½ championship reign without having faced any half-decent opposition.
Wilder fighting guys that aren't worthy of a title shot is the story of his entire title reign. You might as well get used to that sh*t because he'll still be doing it next year too.
Re: Wilder vs washington
Better than what was originally scheduled, though Washington being better than Wawrzyk doesn't somehow make this a good fight.
Washington has fought one decent opponent, someone who wasn't even top 15 themselves, and was fortunate to get a draw. His best win is over a shell of Eddie Chambers who didn't remotely try to win.
Washington has fought one decent opponent, someone who wasn't even top 15 themselves, and was fortunate to get a draw. His best win is over a shell of Eddie Chambers who didn't remotely try to win.
Re: Wilder vs washington
Correct... Washington is big, stiff, slow, awkward, and has no weapons. At one time he looked like a fair prospect for the NFL, but failed to get drafted because of numerous injuries he suffered.. For me he's another Seth Mitchell except that his knees aren't as bad.. But his Boxing skills are even more undeveloped.. He's big and strong and he can hit, but he's not going to hit Wilder.
He should be matched with Dominic Breazeale, not Deontay Wilder. The world has gone mad with matchups like this. The Povetkin lawsuit is coming up this month versus Dibella and Wilder... Hopefully Wilder's shameful ass will be nailed to wall for everyone to see.
He should be matched with Dominic Breazeale, not Deontay Wilder. The world has gone mad with matchups like this. The Povetkin lawsuit is coming up this month versus Dibella and Wilder... Hopefully Wilder's shameful ass will be nailed to wall for everyone to see.
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: Wilder vs washington
Ya'll bitch about anything.
Re: Wilder vs washington
If Wilder fights a legit opponent 29 years from now, then I can let this slide.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs washington
I was just wondering, if Wada/Vada once again have no option left but admitting Povetkin is 100% innocent, just like all other times this most tested boxer in the world has, shouldn't he replace Washington anyway?
Re: Wilder vs washington
Lackeos wrote:If Wilder fights a legit opponent 29 years from now, then I can let this slide.
Re: Wilder vs washington
Another ridicolous fight for Wilder. Just a little bit less ridicolous than the other ones.
Re: Wilder vs washington
Who knows how good Washington really is yet, being undefeated, but if it is a mismatch it must mean Wilder is better than most here would like to admit. I understand because he is coming off two surgeries. If Wilder does not fight a legit top opponent after this, I will be 100% on the band wagon to call for him to be stripped.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs washington
About as good as a 44 year old out of prime 6ft1 Amir Mansour, who already lost 1,5 year before against current cruiserweight Steve Cunningham.Badhusker wrote:Who knows how good Washington really is yet, being undefeated, but if it is a mismatch it must mean Wilder is better than most here would like to admit. I understand because he is coming off two surgeries. If Wilder does not fight a legit top opponent after this, I will be 100% on the band wagon to call for him to be stripped.
Re: Wilder vs washington
Fortunate to get a draw against Mansour, in a hard fight with Aguilera......I don't think he's some hidden special talent.
Re: Wilder vs washington
Washington is by far his worse defence yet, you are getting misled by the fact he is undefeated, there is a good reason he is undefeated. He has a punchers chance but will likely get knocked out.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7467
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Wilder vs washington
By far? I don't think he's any worse than Arreola, Molina, or Duhaupas.Lennox wrote:Washington is by far his worse defence yet, you are getting misled by the fact he is undefeated, there is a good reason he is undefeated. He has a punchers chance but will likely get knocked out.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9457
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: Wilder vs washington
I agree that they are all on the same level.jujigatame wrote:By far? I don't think he's any worse than Arreola, Molina, or Duhaupas.Lennox wrote:Washington is by far his worse defence yet, you are getting misled by the fact he is undefeated, there is a good reason he is undefeated. He has a punchers chance but will likely get knocked out.
-
jujigatame
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7467
- Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08
Re: Wilder vs washington
If we're considering how bad the challenger looked at the time the fight was made, I think Molina was the worst of the bunch. But Molina did go on to KO Adamek a year later so he looks better in hindsight.