Fury without Peter?

mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23138
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Fury without Peter?

Post by mickey1975 »

Is the comeback on?
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by SAPFO »

Big news coming Tyson reckons. Gonna be Browne ain't it?
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by bripez »

mickey1975 wrote:Is the comeback on?
Is that the rumour?

Any names of potential trainers mentioned?

Boxers often need to do as they are told by their trainer, I cant imagine Tyson being told what to do by anybody other than Peter (although it could be that he doesn't want to do what he says either?).
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by sweetscience »

i think for his own good he should relocate to the states (fight in UK)
DazDiCanio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 21 Apr 2013, 04:49

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by DazDiCanio »

Remember had bad Tyson looked the last time he fought without Peter?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23138
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by mickey1975 »

A friend said a while ago he couldn't see Tyson and Peter working together again but I didn't give it much thought.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by bripez »

DazDiCanio wrote:Remember had bad Tyson looked the last time he fought without Peter?
True, he also didn't look like a world beater until Peter took over his training.

Not that Peter is the best trainer ever, it is just that he appeared to be the only person who Tyson would listen to and do as he was told.

Any split would cause interesting dynamics in the Fury family.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by ElJefe »

Obviously difficult to make a judgement on this without knowing the ins and outs of their relationship, but this doesn't strike me as good news for Tyson if I'm honest.
DazDiCanio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 21 Apr 2013, 04:49

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by DazDiCanio »

Imagine if he's gone to Coldwell :lol:
ejruane
Cruiserweight
Posts: 50
Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 20:20

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by ejruane »

Fury can box (no genius but ok) and he's a very big feller who can spark opponents, but personally I believe he has severe psychological problems and should not be allowed anywhere near a ring.

If there was a sport called arm bashing that had a governing body, would they allow someone with a broken to compete?

The brain (specially one as fragile as Fury's) should be protected as much as is humanly possible and personally, I find it incredible that any governing body would sanction Fury against anyone.

It is a matter of record he is prone to depression and has in the past talked suicide, so is it really wise to say "yeah that's a brain that's ok to punch over and over"

I know he's a massive feller but when I hear him talk, I know there's basically a 13 year old boy in there.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by lillywhite14 »

I think nearly all his issues have probably been brought on by certain family members.

Can't have been easy with some of the senior male figures in his immediate family.

I'd love to see him comeback, but only if he wants to.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by Mimmy »

an exact date of 13 May. So what show is that going to be on?
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

ejruane wrote:Fury can box (no genius but ok) and he's a very big feller who can spark opponents, but personally I believe he has severe psychological problems and should not be allowed anywhere near a ring.

If there was a sport called arm bashing that had a governing body, would they allow someone with a broken to compete?

The brain (specially one as fragile as Fury's) should be protected as much as is humanly possible and personally, I find it incredible that any governing body would sanction Fury against anyone.

It is a matter of record he is prone to depression and has in the past talked suicide, so is it really wise to say "yeah that's a brain that's ok to punch over and over"

I know he's a massive feller but when I hear him talk, I know there's basically a 13 year old boy in there.
I love the idea of a man with a broken arm trying to enter an arm bashing tournament :lol:
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by Monte Fisto »

have they definitely split?
ejruane
Cruiserweight
Posts: 50
Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 20:20

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by ejruane »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
ejruane wrote:Fury can box (no genius but ok) and he's a very big feller who can spark opponents, but personally I believe he has severe psychological problems and should not be allowed anywhere near a ring.

If there was a sport called arm bashing that had a governing body, would they allow someone with a broken to compete?

The brain (specially one as fragile as Fury's) should be protected as much as is humanly possible and personally, I find it incredible that any governing body would sanction Fury against anyone.

It is a matter of record he is prone to depression and has in the past talked suicide, so is it really wise to say "yeah that's a brain that's ok to punch over and over"

I know he's a massive feller but when I hear him talk, I know there's basically a 13 year old boy in there.
I love the idea of a man with a broken arm trying to enter an arm bashing tournament :lol:
ESPN II extra plus (3.am) ARM-BASH lll - Heavyweight eliminator. Mike 'Army' Armstrong V Pancho 'El Bow' Archer.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by Taansend »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
ejruane wrote:Fury can box (no genius but ok) and he's a very big feller who can spark opponents, but personally I believe he has severe psychological problems and should not be allowed anywhere near a ring.

If there was a sport called arm bashing that had a governing body, would they allow someone with a broken to compete?

The brain (specially one as fragile as Fury's) should be protected as much as is humanly possible and personally, I find it incredible that any governing body would sanction Fury against anyone.

It is a matter of record he is prone to depression and has in the past talked suicide, so is it really wise to say "yeah that's a brain that's ok to punch over and over"

I know he's a massive feller but when I hear him talk, I know there's basically a 13 year old boy in there.
I love the idea of a man with a broken arm trying to enter an arm bashing tournament :lol:
It's the best analogy ever :lol:
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by Boxerbeetle »

ejruane wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
ejruane wrote:Fury can box (no genius but ok) and he's a very big feller who can spark opponents, but personally I believe he has severe psychological problems and should not be allowed anywhere near a ring.

If there was a sport called arm bashing that had a governing body, would they allow someone with a broken to compete?

The brain (specially one as fragile as Fury's) should be protected as much as is humanly possible and personally, I find it incredible that any governing body would sanction Fury against anyone.

It is a matter of record he is prone to depression and has in the past talked suicide, so is it really wise to say "yeah that's a brain that's ok to punch over and over"

I know he's a massive feller but when I hear him talk, I know there's basically a 13 year old boy in there.
I love the idea of a man with a broken arm trying to enter an arm bashing tournament :lol:
ESPN II extra plus (3.am) ARM-BASH lll - Heavyweight eliminator. Mike 'Army' Armstrong V Pancho 'El Bow' Archer.
I would watch that.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by crusader »

mickey1975 wrote:A friend said a while ago he couldn't see Tyson and Peter working together again but I didn't give it much thought.
What happened between them?
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23138
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by mickey1975 »

crusader wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:A friend said a while ago he couldn't see Tyson and Peter working together again but I didn't give it much thought.
What happened between them?
I don't know.
pimp
Super Middleweight
Posts: 288
Joined: 27 Nov 2012, 16:55

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by pimp »

From what I seen and it was only brief was that Tyson was the boss in the gym, but I spoke to him and he was sick of a lot of his family including Pete, I posted this before and got laughed at :TU:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28519
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by Coco »

Despite not having any personal experience in the gym with them, I always felt that Peter did a really good job, and I think Tyson will be worse without him. For me Tyson def showed improvement when Peter took over, and using the most obv example of the VK fight Fury was in great shape with a great plan.
I'm guessing his father will take over now......
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by billy nelson »

Tyson should stay with Peter, better being told the truth than a coach kissing your ass, he respects Peter
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8627
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by coneye »

Logic would say stick with Peter ,, but it would be hard with his Dad on the sidelines wanting the fame and glory .. Could imagine it would wear the big fella down , when all said and done ones his uncle , but the others his dad ,,, bit of a mayweather situation coming up
DazDiCanio
Super Middleweight
Posts: 506
Joined: 21 Apr 2013, 04:49

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by DazDiCanio »

Just what we need, big John Fury all over TV & IFL :stop:
dalcumly
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1319
Joined: 03 Sep 2010, 08:11

Re: Fury without Peter?

Post by dalcumly »

I don't get the impression that Fury is an arrogant , know it all type of person.
If someone like Ronnie Davies or Jimmy Tibbs were coaching him I'm sure there wouldn't be a problem. As long as he respected what they were doing.
The big problem is of course that Fury can't go anywhere, like America for instance, where you need a visa because his father and uncle wouldn't be allowed in. I don't know about Hughies fight with Parker. The venue hasn't been decided, but do you need to get a visa to visit New Zealand?
Peter seems to have done a good job so far and he obviously understands Furys moods. I'm not sure others would recognise the danger signals. And remember the teams tactics against Klitschko were first class.
Post Reply