Wilder is a hoax

Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by Kalan »

Badhusker wrote:Just curious.........can you name any heavyweight that Wilder has ducked? I mean, who has offered a fight to him that he turned down? His resume is weak, but as far as I know he has not ducked anyone. Maybe that is what the top guys should put out there instead of blowing smoke. Has Joshua, Wlad, Ortiz, Parker, Fury ever made a legitimate offer to Wilder?
Yes... They had a fight set with Povetkin and got VADA to raise questions about a PED test that easily passed. The WBC chimed in and said they needed to do an "investigation" ... The investigation took months and destroyed the fight, but Povetkin was exonerated... Then the WBC said Povetkin had to fight Stiverne to get to Wilder.. and the day of the fight they came up with 1/10 of a nanogram of Ostarine -- the same crap they said Bute and Browne took... Bute, Browne, and Povetkin all insist they'd never dream of taking Ostarine and had no idea what it is or what it does.

Ortiz has been calling out Wilder for years.. He was supposed to be the next mandatory, but the WBC is in Wilder's pocket.

And Wilder is not looking for Joshua.. He's trying to get the very beatable Parker -- who "won" his fights with Takam and Ruiz with questionable decisions.
nmhz
Welterweight
Posts: 257
Joined: 14 Jun 2016, 01:24

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by nmhz »

Wilder is definatley not a 'hoax', he just hasn't proved his status of a champion
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Through 5 title defenses, Wilder is actually on par with Canelo at that point.

I was the only one here ranting about Canelo's disgraceful ride to the top.
What makes Wilder so different?
In fact, Wilder's championship win was 1000000000000 times more valid than Canelo's championship.

I won't watch Wilder until he steps up.
Also, I don't give a F UCK about these B ULLSHIT titles, so it's whatever that he has one.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by Badhusker »

Kalan wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Just curious.........can you name any heavyweight that Wilder has ducked? I mean, who has offered a fight to him that he turned down? His resume is weak, but as far as I know he has not ducked anyone. Maybe that is what the top guys should put out there instead of blowing smoke. Has Joshua, Wlad, Ortiz, Parker, Fury ever made a legitimate offer to Wilder?
Yes... They had a fight set with Povetkin and got VADA to raise questions about a PED test that easily passed. The WBC chimed in and said they needed to do an "investigation" ... The investigation took months and destroyed the fight, but Povetkin was exonerated... Then the WBC said Povetkin had to fight Stiverne to get to Wilder.. and the day of the fight they came up with 1/10 of a nanogram of Ostarine -- the same crap they said Bute and Browne took... Bute, Browne, and Povetkin all insist they'd never dream of taking Ostarine and had no idea what it is or what it does.

Ortiz has been calling out Wilder for years.. He was supposed to be the next mandatory, but the WBC is in Wilder's pocket.

And Wilder is not looking for Joshua.. He's trying to get the very beatable Parker -- who "won" his fights with Takam and Ruiz with questionable decisions.

Please stop with your tired Povetkin BS and conspiracy theories. Everyone is tired of hearing it except you and a few other dumbasses. The only reason the mods don't lock stupid threads about it, or ban the fools that carry it on is because they are entertained by how stupid you guys make yourselves look. Wilder didn't duck Povetkin. The WBC cancelled the fight. As far as Ortiz, calling someone out isn't the same as making an offer. Not looking for someone is not the same as ducking. (Joshua)
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by montrealsuper »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
victor-romeo wrote:John Ruiz was better than Wilder and he was terrible.
Ruiz was more accomplished than vitali.
worst idiotic sentence in the history of Box Rec right there :clap: :clap: :clap:
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by montrealsuper »

Badhusker wrote:
Kalan wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Just curious.........can you name any heavyweight that Wilder has ducked? I mean, who has offered a fight to him that he turned down? His resume is weak, but as far as I know he has not ducked anyone. Maybe that is what the top guys should put out there instead of blowing smoke. Has Joshua, Wlad, Ortiz, Parker, Fury ever made a legitimate offer to Wilder?
Yes... They had a fight set with Povetkin and got VADA to raise questions about a PED test that easily passed. The WBC chimed in and said they needed to do an "investigation" ... The investigation took months and destroyed the fight, but Povetkin was exonerated... Then the WBC said Povetkin had to fight Stiverne to get to Wilder.. and the day of the fight they came up with 1/10 of a nanogram of Ostarine -- the same crap they said Bute and Browne took... Bute, Browne, and Povetkin all insist they'd never dream of taking Ostarine and had no idea what it is or what it does.

Ortiz has been calling out Wilder for years.. He was supposed to be the next mandatory, but the WBC is in Wilder's pocket.

And Wilder is not looking for Joshua.. He's trying to get the very beatable Parker -- who "won" his fights with Takam and Ruiz with questionable decisions.

Please stop with your tired Povetkin BS and conspiracy theories. Everyone is tired of hearing it except you and a few other dumbasses. The only reason the mods don't lock stupid threads about it, or ban the fools that carry it on is because they are entertained by how stupid you guys make yourselves look. Wilder didn't duck Povetkin. The WBC cancelled the fight. As far as Ortiz, calling someone out isn't the same as making an offer. Not looking for someone is not the same as ducking. (Joshua)
Too naive to understand how AH corruption works - Yes it looks very very very probable that Wilder was protected by the WBC of having to fight Povetkin so AH could save and extend his fraud cash cow pretender :TU: :TU: Look at how the WBC turned a blind eye and ignored totally IGNORED Fraudweather's ILLEGAL IV the day before the Pacquiao fight - WBC sells itself like a ho
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by Ilya Muromets »

I wouldn't call him a hoax. He has a dynamite punch. But he is super protected. His handlers know his vulnerabilities. I think Povetkin, and Fury, if he gets back in fighting shape, would have an easy time with him, closing in on him and roughing him up on the inside, taking advantage of his amateurish moves. Wladimir too of course if he's still got it. Joshua too probably tho I'm still not sure about him. He's never fought a real top contender, same as Wilder.
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by montrealsuper »

x2x wrote:I wouldn't call him a hoax. He has a dynamite punch. But he is super protected. His handlers know his vulnerabilities. I think Povetkin, and Fury, if he gets back in fighting shape, would have an easy time with him, closing in on him and roughing him up on the inside, taking advantage of his amateurish moves. Wladimir too of course if he's still got it. Joshua too probably tho I'm still not sure about him. He's never fought a real top contender, same as Wilder.
Only a fraud hoax pretender needs to be "super protected" - a true real warrior doesn't want or need ANY protections :TU:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Povetkin is the true hoax.
RScarf1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1418
Joined: 18 Aug 2005, 22:31

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by RScarf1 »

crusader wrote:
RScarf1 wrote:What about Parker? Isn't he protected?
At 24, having been pro for 18 fights, 3 years, and 10 months, he fought someone just as good as any of the 38 opponents Wilder has faced over almost 9 years. I think he should be given more time before he's labelled protected in the same manner as Deontay 'Damon McCreary' Wilder.
Parker is a world champion. Not the best, but he has a world title from a major sanctioning body. If he was a contender without a world title, then fine, fight whoever you want. This is different though. Real world champions are not supposed to be developed slowly with handpicked opponents, although I know this is not unusual these days. If he beats Baby Huey, then he should next fight a mandatory challenger who is a legitimate contender.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by Killer Blow »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Povetkin is the true hoax.
Both are frauds.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Killer Blow wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Povetkin is the true hoax.
Both are frauds.
One is a proven fraud, Povetkin.
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by victor-romeo »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
victor-romeo wrote:John Ruiz was better than Wilder and he was terrible.
Ruiz was more accomplished than vitali.
I have to disagree with you on that one.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by crusader »

RScarf1 wrote:
crusader wrote:
RScarf1 wrote:What about Parker? Isn't he protected?
At 24, having been pro for 18 fights, 3 years, and 10 months, he fought someone just as good as any of the 38 opponents Wilder has faced over almost 9 years. I think he should be given more time before he's labelled protected in the same manner as Deontay 'Damon McCreary' Wilder.
Parker is a world champion. Not the best, but he has a world title from a major sanctioning body. If he was a contender without a world title, then fine, fight whoever you want. This is different though. Real world champions are not supposed to be developed slowly with handpicked opponents, although I know this is not unusual these days. If he beats Baby Huey, then he should next fight a mandatory challenger who is a legitimate contender.
Parker hasn't even had one fight as champ. I'll give him some time....
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

victor-romeo wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
victor-romeo wrote:John Ruiz was better than Wilder and he was terrible.
Ruiz was more accomplished than vitali.
I have to disagree with you on that one.
Certainly not unreasonable. It's close.
Killer Blow
Welterweight
Posts: 513
Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by Killer Blow »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Povetkin is the true hoax.
Both are frauds.
One is a proven fraud, Povetkin.
Both are proven frauds, for different reasons.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5465
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by candyslim »

I think Povetkin is a formidable fighter (whether or not that is partially due to PEDs or not I'm not qualified to venture an opinion) who has lost only to a peak form Wladimir Klitscko who in terms of physique and style had the perfect tools to beat him. I just wish all this drug-shite would not keep me from watching Povetkin against a top level fighter.

Again, leaving drug controversies aside, he reminds me of one of my all-time favourite Heavyweights, Jerry Quarry in that both are quite short and compact (relatively speaking for their respective eras) conceding height and reach to the elite of the division, both having a good chin, very good technique and power in abundance.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Killer Blow wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
Both are frauds.
One is a proven fraud, Povetkin.
Both are proven frauds, for different reasons.
No
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by asdfjkl »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: One is a proven fraud, Povetkin.
Both are proven frauds, for different reasons.
No
If Povetkin was a hoax, Wilder ofcourse would have loved to fight him, in reality, Povetkin is simply a top contender and Wilder isn't. That's also the reason Wilder continually avoids him.
stayinshape
Middleweight
Posts: 26
Joined: 17 Jul 2013, 10:52

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by stayinshape »

All sreaming "wilder fight only bums!"

But...take a look at heavyweight rankings here....in my opinion i see only 4-5 Top Heavyweights.

Klitschko
Povetkin
Wilder
Joshua
Maybe...Parker & Ortiz

Pulev showed terrible performance against Klitschko. Big Mouth then go diving a lot.

Then in ranking we had Fighter like Martin...Christian Hammer,Guillermo Jones (Who's that???), Teper
In my opinion in Heavyweight today we had a problem. Handfull Topfighter, then the rest.

Povetkin last 5 Fights...i see...Duhaupas,Wach, Perez,Takam, Charr....
We take a look to Joshuas last Fights...Molina, Breazeale,Martin, Whyte, Cornish
Parker & Ortiz it's the same

When we now call all Fighters after Ortiz in Ranking "Bums" then all Topheavyweights fight bums, why should wilder fell in shame when he fights bums too??
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5465
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by candyslim »

Who's Guillermo Jones? ... seriously???

Wasn't he in Noriega's class at school? :D
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by montrealsuper »

stayinshape wrote:All sreaming "wilder fight only bums!"

But...take a look at heavyweight rankings here....in my opinion i see only 4-5 Top Heavyweights.

Klitschko
Povetkin
Wilder
Joshua
Maybe...Parker & Ortiz

Pulev showed terrible performance against Klitschko. Big Mouth then go diving a lot.

Then in ranking we had Fighter like Martin...Christian Hammer,Guillermo Jones (Who's that???), Teper
In my opinion in Heavyweight today we had a problem. Handfull Topfighter, then the rest.

Povetkin last 5 Fights...i see...Duhaupas,Wach, Perez,Takam, Charr....
We take a look to Joshuas last Fights...Molina, Breazeale,Martin, Whyte, Cornish
Parker & Ortiz it's the same

When we now call all Fighters after Ortiz in Ranking "Bums" then all Topheavyweights fight bums, why should wilder fell in shame when he fights bums too??
Pulev put up a very tough fight vs WK -
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by montrealsuper »

:TU: :TU: :TU: :TU: :clap:
asdfjkl wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Killer Blow wrote:
Both are proven frauds, for different reasons.
No
If Povetkin was a hoax, Wilder ofcourse would have loved to fight him, in reality, Povetkin is simply a top contender and Wilder isn't. That's also the reason Wilder continually avoids him.
montrealsuper
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1056
Joined: 18 Nov 2010, 12:44

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by montrealsuper »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
victor-romeo wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Ruiz was more accomplished than vitali.
I have to disagree with you on that one.
Certainly not unreasonable. It's close.
Then why did King shelter Ruizzz to duck Vitali?
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2403
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: Wilder is a hoax

Post by Thomastearns »

Leaves me with a bad taste to discover that Carl Lewis failed 3 drug tests at the US trials in 88 BEFORE the fateful showdown with Ben Johnson in Seoul. Somehow they were covered up because he was the golden boy.

Boxing needs to and can get this issue cleared. Povetkin may just be a patsy. We don't know, but someone does.
Post Reply