Which attribute would you have?

Which one?

Power
16
32%
Speed
10
20%
Timing
24
48%
 
Total votes: 50

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101170
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Which attribute would you have?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Power

Speed

Timing

and why?
Last edited by Ruthless-RKO on 24 May 2019, 09:32, edited 2 times in total.
Impractical Poster
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Impractical Poster »

Watching.

Because I'm too much of a sissy to fight.
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Shirow »

Timing beats speed in defence and offence and if you can't land the power is inconsequential.
Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Loki »

All of them. But, in order - timing, power then speed.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Power and speed, my best attribute is a concrete chin.
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Jip »

to me 1 power and 2 speed.

i walk love to have super speed, but KO power in either hands would be the best.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by ElJefe »

1. Timing
2. Power
3. Speed
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Enlightened-One »

Isn't speed a necessary component of power? Power = speed x strength
Supremo
Super Middleweight
Posts: 698
Joined: 12 May 2013, 04:46

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Supremo »

Enlightened-One wrote:Isn't speed a necessary component of power? Power = speed x strength
Aye buy speed x no strength = no power.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Stuarty »

Impractical Poster wrote:Watching.

Because I'm too much of a sissy to fight.
Same :yay: I hate getting punched on the face! You never quite get used to it :lol:
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by jezzamundo »

In order of importance, I'd say timing, then speed, then power.

I've done a fair bit of sparring in my time, with amateur and one professional boxers and I was always praised as having very good power for my size, but I definitely lacked in speed, timing and especially stamina compared to the more accomplished boxers I shared the ring with.
AngryGoon38
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by AngryGoon38 »

Had i become a pro boxer,say at 18,when i was 5-8,i would've fought at 135-140. At that time my top attributes would've been speed and stamina. Zoom ahead a few years,after i had filled out a bit to around 160 at 5-10,i would've been more towards a brawler(Mickey Ward) type. And another few years later,in my mid 20's and later 20's i'd have filled out even more to the 175 division and i'd be a combination of decent speed,power,timing(counter-punching)and stamina all combined. :box:
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by candyslim »

My inclination would be to run away so I'd say "speed" :D
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2401
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Thomastearns »

Ruthless-RKO wrote:Power

Speed

Timing

and why?
Speed. Fast reflexes (head movement eg Tyson/Rooney) and hand speed are vital. Great footwork is the hallmark of the best champions. Amazing how long it took for British boxing to catch on. Even now we haven't seen a British Pacquiao, Ali, Leonard, Robinson etc. The most mobile British fighter I have seen was Calzaghe.

Power next as it keeps opponents wary and can mean early nights. If only Frank Bruno and Gary Mason had possessed slightly better footwork.. Yes I know you need to be grounded to deliver power, which is why you rarely see both in one fighter.

Timing last but not least. It seems to be connected to confidence in the ring. Duran is the one I remember best. Even against bigger more powerful fighters he seemed fearless and at ease.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by asdfjkl »

I got power and speed, but timing would be the handiest in a fight.
Sequitorian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1766
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Sequitorian »

There is more to timing than anyone knows ...

I challenge anyone to describe / define it ...

...
Sequitorian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1766
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Sequitorian »

Sequitorian wrote: 03 Jul 2018, 15:01 There is more to timing than anyone knows ...

I challenge anyone to describe / define it ...

...
New thread ... http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=223062 ...
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101170
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Sequitorian wrote: 03 Jul 2018, 15:01 There is more to timing than anyone knows ...

I challenge anyone to describe / define it ...

...
Timing when to duck and bob etc. When to counter?
Sequitorian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1766
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 15:35

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Sequitorian »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Jul 2018, 15:32
Sequitorian wrote: 03 Jul 2018, 15:01 There is more to timing than anyone knows ...

I challenge anyone to describe / define it ...

...
Timing when to duck and bob etc. When to counter?
Yeah but no one talks about timing in the mechanics of a punch ... "form" ...

... just as important ... maybe MORE important than anything else ...

...
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46326
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by gilgamesh »

Timing would probably be the most important of the 3. Because speed and power only do so much for you if you're not accurate, if you have good timing I'd assume that would mean you're accurate.
Sorono
Super Featherweight
Posts: 100
Joined: 15 Jun 2018, 17:05

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Sorono »

Power. Would just be cool to hurt somebody every time i touch m clean
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101170
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Here’s a question..

Which boxer past or present, has/had all three attributes?
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9007
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Syntax Error »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Jul 2018, 17:48 Here’s a question..

Which boxer past or present, has/had all three attributes?
Sugar Ray Leonard.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9435
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by tiny_acres »

Syntax Error wrote: 03 Jul 2018, 18:02
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Jul 2018, 17:48 Here’s a question..

Which boxer past or present, has/had all three attributes?
Sugar Ray Leonard.
I always thought his power was more from speed than actually having true pure knock out power
Thomastearns
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2401
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 11:11

Re: Which attribute would you have?

Post by Thomastearns »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Jul 2018, 17:48 Here’s a question..

Which boxer past or present, has/had all three attributes?
Some obvious examples are Jack Dempsey Ray Robinson, Mike Tyson, and Roy Jones Jr.
All of them near untouchable at their peaks.
Post Reply