I know after furys first fight with klitschko they had a rematch clause could klitschko still use this if Tyson comes back? Or does it go after a certain period of time ?
Thanks
Fury v Klitschko
Re: Fury v Klitschko
If Fury gets past the drug charges and isn't banned then I still think he's a year or so away from a fight at that level. He needs to be fighting someone along the Charr/Helenius lines to get back into form.
If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
I don't know, but I can't see him wanting to with Tyson holding nothing and I'm sure it would definitely become void after Tyson fought someone.
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: Fury v Klitschko
Yeah but that's not what I'm getting at, what I mean is if he's contracted to fight klitschko by a rematch clause would he even be allowed to take an interim fight?dirk2686 wrote:If Fury gets past the drug charges and isn't banned then I still think he's a year or so away from a fight at that level. He needs to be fighting someone along the Charr/Helenius lines to get back into form.
If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
I imagine Wlad fighting someone else in the interim puts pay to any rematch clause for the original fight. Remember, Wlad has a rematch clause with Joshua; he can't have two rematch clauses active at the same time.craigjenkins05 wrote:Yeah but that's not what I'm getting at, what I mean is if he's contracted to fight klitschko by a rematch clause would he even be allowed to take an interim fight?dirk2686 wrote:If Fury gets past the drug charges and isn't banned then I still think he's a year or so away from a fight at that level. He needs to be fighting someone along the Charr/Helenius lines to get back into form.
If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
I believe the moment Wlad signs a contract to fight Joshua, including rematch clause, whilst Fury is at home without a licence to box, the original rematch clause between Wlad and Fury is gone.
-
craigjenkins05
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 477
- Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03
Re: Fury v Klitschko
dirk2686 wrote:Oh good thankscraigjenkins05 wrote:Yeah but that's not what I'm getting at, what I mean is if he's contracted to fight klitschko by a rematch clause would he even be allowed to take an interim fight?dirk2686 wrote:If Fury gets past the drug charges and isn't banned then I still think he's a year or so away from a fight at that level. He needs to be fighting someone along the Charr/Helenius lines to get back into form.
If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
I imagine Wlad fighting someone else in the interim puts pay to any rematch clause for the original fight. Remember, Wlad has a rematch clause with Joshua; he can't have two rematch clauses active at the same time.
I believe the moment Wlad signs a contract to fight Joshua, including rematch clause, whilst Fury is at home without a licence to box, the original rematch clause between Wlad and Fury is gone.
Re: Fury v Klitschko
when will Fury be licensed??