Fury v Klitschko

Post Reply
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Fury v Klitschko

Post by craigjenkins05 »

I know after furys first fight with klitschko they had a rematch clause could klitschko still use this if Tyson comes back? Or does it go after a certain period of time ?

Thanks
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by dirk2686 »

If Fury gets past the drug charges and isn't banned then I still think he's a year or so away from a fight at that level. He needs to be fighting someone along the Charr/Helenius lines to get back into form.

If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by Covfefe »

I don't know, but I can't see him wanting to with Tyson holding nothing and I'm sure it would definitely become void after Tyson fought someone.
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by craigjenkins05 »

dirk2686 wrote:If Fury gets past the drug charges and isn't banned then I still think he's a year or so away from a fight at that level. He needs to be fighting someone along the Charr/Helenius lines to get back into form.

If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
Yeah but that's not what I'm getting at, what I mean is if he's contracted to fight klitschko by a rematch clause would he even be allowed to take an interim fight?
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by dirk2686 »

craigjenkins05 wrote:
dirk2686 wrote:If Fury gets past the drug charges and isn't banned then I still think he's a year or so away from a fight at that level. He needs to be fighting someone along the Charr/Helenius lines to get back into form.

If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
Yeah but that's not what I'm getting at, what I mean is if he's contracted to fight klitschko by a rematch clause would he even be allowed to take an interim fight?
I imagine Wlad fighting someone else in the interim puts pay to any rematch clause for the original fight. Remember, Wlad has a rematch clause with Joshua; he can't have two rematch clauses active at the same time.

I believe the moment Wlad signs a contract to fight Joshua, including rematch clause, whilst Fury is at home without a licence to box, the original rematch clause between Wlad and Fury is gone.
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by craigjenkins05 »

dirk2686 wrote:
craigjenkins05 wrote:
dirk2686 wrote:If Fury gets past the drug charges and isn't banned then I still think he's a year or so away from a fight at that level. He needs to be fighting someone along the Charr/Helenius lines to get back into form.

If he went straight back in with a motivated Wlad who was prepared to go for it I think he'd be in real danger of an aborted comeback before it really got going.
Yeah but that's not what I'm getting at, what I mean is if he's contracted to fight klitschko by a rematch clause would he even be allowed to take an interim fight?
Oh good thanks

I imagine Wlad fighting someone else in the interim puts pay to any rematch clause for the original fight. Remember, Wlad has a rematch clause with Joshua; he can't have two rematch clauses active at the same time.

I believe the moment Wlad signs a contract to fight Joshua, including rematch clause, whilst Fury is at home without a licence to box, the original rematch clause between Wlad and Fury is gone.
stellar
Super Lightweight
Posts: 247
Joined: 19 Nov 2016, 07:00

Re: Fury v Klitschko

Post by stellar »

when will Fury be licensed??
Post Reply