Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1653
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by APerno »

Chuck1052 wrote:For many decades until the 1930s in the United States, the very formidable anti-boxing forces went out of their way to curb professional boxing before and after Jack Johnson was the world heavyweight champion. The presence of Johnson undoubtedly is an important factor in the federal legislation prohibiting the interstate transportation of fight films being enacted, but the anti-boxing forces probably would have backed such legislation even if Johnson wasn't around.

- Chuck Johnston

Yes I think the progressive reformers made an unholy alliance with the Southern racists (the enemy of my enemy . . .) - but without the racist issue added in I doubt the reformers ever get the law passed. - According to Streible the first time Congress looked at the 'problem' (the 1910 failed effort) Uncle Joe Cannon (Speaker) stopped the debate so he could 'spar' with Battling Nelson, whom they had called to testify. - I agree take Johnson (race) out of the mix and you still have the protesters, but I don't think you get the law passed.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

APerno wrote:Kalan - I actually do expect an apology
For what? Being wrong about whether a law passed in 1910 or 1912??? You're hung up on dates..

Is the exact date of the utmost importance? Or what happened on the date? A bill passed that outlawed the interstate transportation of fight films. Is the fact that the date is sometimes mistakenly represented as 1910 the important thing? Or the fact that such a onerous law passed at all? Sometimes the dates of the Johnson-Willard and Johnson-Jeffries fights are misrepresented in print. But Is the exact date the important thing to know??? Or what happened on those dates??? What date was the Emancipation Proclamation signed.. You'd have to google it and a lot of other important dates you don't know.. Is the important thing the date or what important events in history meant for humankind???

I'll tell you what??? You apologize for not addressing the overwhelming mountain of evidence that the Johnson-Willard Fight was as phony as a 3 dollar bill.
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1653
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by APerno »

Kalan wrote:
APerno wrote:Kalan - I actually do expect an apology
For what? Being wrong about whether a law passed in 1910 or 1912??? You're hung up on dates..

Is the exact date of the utmost importance? Or what happened on the date? A bill passed that outlawed the interstate transportation of fight films. Is the fact that the date is sometimes mistakenly represented as 1910 the important thing? Or the fact that such a onerous law passed at all? Sometimes the dates of the Johnson-Willard and Johnson-Jeffries fights are misrepresented in print. But Is the exact date the important thing to know??? Or what happened on those dates??? What date was the Emancipation Proclamation signed.. You'd have to google it and a lot of other important dates you don't know.. Is the important thing the date or what important events in history meant for humankind???

I'll tell you what??? You apologize for not addressing the overwhelming mountain of evidence that the Johnson-Willard Fight was as phony as a 3 dollar bill.
No - no - no - it is not about the date it is about how the article referred to a Johnson fight that took place 27 days before the bill passed into law (July 31 1912) - it identify the wrong fight - that fight was Johnson-Flynn, not Johnson-Jeffries - that was all I am trying to say, but you got hung up on insisting it was the wrong date - the guy had the the wrong fight, but the right date - I am not hung up on the date - I am hung up on the fact that the damn Times reporter did not know that Johnson just fought Flynn 27 days earlier. He knew enough to point out the 27 days, but never looked to see who Johnson fought.

I would love to explain to you the importance of the Flynn fight in the passing of the Sims Act, it was the event that caused Congress to act, not Johnson-Jeffries, that is why the date is important; 27 days after the Flynn fight, July 31st 1912, the act passed, a full two years after Johnson-Jeffries.

You still shouldn't have insulted me professionally; unnecessary.
Chuck1052
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4282
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 22:08

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Chuck1052 »

I believe that the April 5, 1915 world heavyweight title bout between Jess Willard and Jack Johnson was legitimate for the following reasons:

1. The film of the knockout shows that Johnson was hit with a hard right cross to the jaw by Willard. As a result, I don't think that Johnson went down for the count because he wanted to.

2. There was very little talk about the bout not being legitimate at the time it took place.

3. Right after losing the bout, Johnson apparently told the New York Times that it was a clean knockout and the best man won.

4. Changing his tune nine months later, Johnson sold his so-called "confession" to Nat Fleischer for $250. In the "confession," Johnson state that he threw the bout for $50,000. in cash and an undisturbed re-entry into the United States. For the rest of his long life, Fleischer himself stated repeatedly that he never believed that Johnson's "confession" was true. Moreover, Johnson was arrested and sent to prison after returning to the United States on July 20, 1920, five years after losing to Willard. What happened to the so-called "deal" that Johnson could have an undisturbed re-entry into the United States if there actually was one? Why would Johnson wait five years before re-entering the U.S. if there was such a "deal?"

5. I myself take very little stock in various conspiracy theories, so many of them appearing to be half-baked or not backed up by solid facts. As someone who has been interested in boxing history for forty-five years, I have never seen any solid evidence showing that Johnson threw the bout.

- Chuck Johnston
APerno
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1653
Joined: 20 Jul 2016, 03:38

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by APerno »

A recent "The Fight City" article covering similar ground; amazing that there is still a need to debunk after all these years. Johnson must be smiling from beyond.

http://www.thefightcity.com/april-5-191 ... s-willard/
Chuck1052
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4282
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 22:08

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Chuck1052 »

APerno wrote:A recent "The Fight City" article covering similar ground; amazing that there is still a need to debunk after all these years. Johnson must be smiling from beyond.

http://www.thefightcity.com/april-5-191 ... s-willard/
I believe that Jess Willard's and Primo Carnera's knockout wins over Jack Johnson and Jack Sharkey respectively.

- Chuck Johnston
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

Chuck1052 wrote:I believe that the April 5, 1915 world heavyweight title bout between Jess Willard and Jack Johnson was legitimate for the following reasons:

1. The film of the knockout shows that Johnson was hit with a hard right cross to the jaw by Willard. As a result, I don't think that Johnson went down for the count because he wanted to.

2. There was very little talk about the bout not being legitimate at the time it took place.

3. Right after losing the bout, Johnson apparently told the New York Times that it was a clean knockout and the best man won.

4. Changing his tune nine months later, Johnson sold his so-called "confession" to Nat Fleischer for $250. In the "confession," Johnson state that he threw the bout for $50,000. in cash and an undisturbed re-entry into the United States. For the rest of his long life, Fleischer himself stated repeatedly that he never believed that Johnson's "confession" was true. Moreover, Johnson was arrested and sent to prison after returning to the United States on July 20, 1920, five years after losing to Willard. What happened to the so-called "deal" that Johnson could have an undisturbed re-entry into the United States if there actually was one? Why would Johnson wait five years before re-entering the U.S. if there was such a "deal?"

5. I myself take very little stock in various conspiracy theories, so many of them appearing to be half-baked or not backed up by solid facts. As someone who has been interested in boxing history for forty-five years, I have never seen any solid evidence showing that Johnson threw the bout.

6. I believe that Jess Willard's and Primo Carnera's knockout wins over Jack Johnson and Jack Sharkey respectively
Easy and obvious rebuttals for anyone who can put 2 and 2 together and make 4.

1. No film or still shot shows the loaded, easy to see right making contact... Newspapers STATE ringsiders were very much in doubt that any KO happened. In fact the audience was dazed at the sudden ending because neither boxer seemed injured.

2. You’re full of nonsense on this point. There was much talk about the fight being illegitimate and that certainly no KO happened. Fans cat called and even yelled out FAKE because the boxers weren’t doing anything for 5 rounds as Johnson waited patiently for his wife to return to her box and signal him. Newspaper articles doubted the KO -- because neither boxer appeared injured and the punch apparently didn’t land. Willard said the KO punch was an uppercut. Propagandists insist it was the loaded right lead -- which no one hits a master boxer with -- and there exists no evidence that the punch landed in slo-mo or still shot -- while there is plenty of evidence that Johnson landed brutal finishing shots on Jeffries and Ketchel.

3. What would Johnson say when being questioned about the KO. Did he want to be arrested for conspiracy since many fans thought the KO was fakery??? He was still the consummate actor, which his acts required of him at the moment. There were feds all over the place following his every move and ready to arrest him.

4. Fleischer always called Johnson the greatest Heavyweight who ever lived, even into the 1960’s and until his death. However Nat always held the sport of Boxing in too high esteem. He preferred to think many famous fake fights were legitimate. The documents called for Johnson to take the count in the 11th round. He said he delayed the ending because the documents hadn’t been given to his wife as in prior agreements. The feds said Johnson’s people took too much time examining the papers and he was in violation of the agreement. People who bet on an 11th round KO were out a ton of money and the feds had a resulting loophole. Johnson was threatened with arrest unless he got his ass back to Europe. Eventually this issue was worked out.

5. Conspiracies happen. Conspiracy theories also happen and they’re 2 different things. You refuse to even look at solid evidence.

6. Carnera’s KO of Sharkey was a terrific right uppercut that can be seen in still shots and motion picture slo-mo.. Likewise, Johnson’s brutally finishing KO's of Jeffries and Ketchel can easily be seen in the motion pictures.. The impacts of those punches were solid and vicious as any ever thrown.. The Willard KO shot of Johnson was a complete joke and doubted by many at ringside. The newspapers also reported that Johnson sent word to his wife to depart before the 26th round because he was ending the fight. And he seemed to set up the KO shot every carefully, fall gently, not let his head bounce on the canvas, have his knees up in the air to start the count, relax them to the canvas, and shade his eyes from the sun with his forearm as he was counted out after a Heavyweight fight that was as tame as any ever seen, and certainly not a brutal clash like Johnson-Jeffries. Are you getting all this Chuck???

Chuck???? … Please read newspaper article http://www.perno.com/Boxing/WJ2.pdf especially paragraph 8 with the heading “actual knockout doubted” ... the newspaper states that certainly no real KO happened... Then read under the next heading where it states that neither man was badly marked or showed evidence of being in a Heavyweight Fight... and that no Heavyweight fight was “less brutal” ... Also read that the ending dazed spectators and came after 3 rounds of “almost complete idleness” on the part of both Johnson and Willard. This fight was heading nowhere -- as Johnson was awaiting signals from his wife’s box and idling about to cat calls of “DO SOMETHING” and “FAKE”
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by punchoutsb »

Kalan wrote:
Chuck1052 wrote:I believe that the April 5, 1915 world heavyweight title bout between Jess Willard and Jack Johnson was legitimate for the following reasons:

1. The film of the knockout shows that Johnson was hit with a hard right cross to the jaw by Willard. As a result, I don't think that Johnson went down for the count because he wanted to.

2. There was very little talk about the bout not being legitimate at the time it took place.

3. Right after losing the bout, Johnson apparently told the New York Times that it was a clean knockout and the best man won.

4. Changing his tune nine months later, Johnson sold his so-called "confession" to Nat Fleischer for $250. In the "confession," Johnson state that he threw the bout for $50,000. in cash and an undisturbed re-entry into the United States. For the rest of his long life, Fleischer himself stated repeatedly that he never believed that Johnson's "confession" was true. Moreover, Johnson was arrested and sent to prison after returning to the United States on July 20, 1920, five years after losing to Willard. What happened to the so-called "deal" that Johnson could have an undisturbed re-entry into the United States if there actually was one? Why would Johnson wait five years before re-entering the U.S. if there was such a "deal?"

5. I myself take very little stock in various conspiracy theories, so many of them appearing to be half-baked or not backed up by solid facts. As someone who has been interested in boxing history for forty-five years, I have never seen any solid evidence showing that Johnson threw the bout.

6. I believe that Jess Willard's and Primo Carnera's knockout wins over Jack Johnson and Jack Sharkey respectively
Easy and obvious rebuttals for anyone who can put 2 and 2 together and make 4.

1. No film or still shot shows the loaded, easy to see right making contact... Newspapers STATE ringsiders were very much in doubt that any KO happened. In fact the audience was dazed at the sudden ending because neither boxer seemed injured.

2. You’re full of nonsense on this point. There was much talk about the fight being illegitimate and that certainly no KO happened. Fans cat called and even yelled out FAKE because the boxers weren’t doing anything for 5 rounds as Johnson waited patiently for his wife to return to her box and signal him. Newspaper articles doubted the KO -- because neither boxer appeared injured and the punch apparently didn’t land. Willard said the KO punch was an uppercut. Propagandists insist it was the loaded right lead -- which no one hits a master boxer with -- and there exists no evidence that the punch landed in slo-mo or still shot -- while there is plenty of evidence that Johnson landed brutal finishing shots on Jeffries and Ketchel.

3. What would Johnson say when being questioned about the KO. Did he want to be arrested for conspiracy since many fans thought the KO was fakery??? He was still the consummate actor, which his acts required of him at the moment. There were feds all over the place following his every move and ready to arrest him.

4. Fleischer always called Johnson the greatest Heavyweight who ever lived, even into the 1960’s and until his death. However Nat always held the sport of Boxing in too high esteem. He preferred to think many famous fake fights were legitimate. The documents called for Johnson to take the count in the 11th round. He said he delayed the ending because the documents hadn’t been given to his wife as in prior agreements. The feds said Johnson’s people took too much time examining the papers and he was in violation of the agreement. People who bet on an 11th round KO were out a ton of money and the feds had a resulting loophole. Johnson was threatened with arrest unless he got his ass back to Europe. Eventually this issue was worked out.

5. Conspiracies happen. Conspiracy theories also happen and they’re 2 different things. You refuse to even look at solid evidence.

6. Carnera’s KO of Sharkey was a terrific right uppercut that can be seen in still shots and motion picture slo-mo.. Likewise, Johnson’s brutally finishing KO's of Jeffries and Ketchel can easily be seen in the motion pictures.. The impacts of those punches were solid and vicious as any ever thrown.. The Willard KO shot of Johnson was a complete joke and doubted by many at ringside. The newspapers also reported that Johnson sent word to his wife to depart before the 26th round because he was ending the fight. And he seemed to set up the KO shot every carefully, fall gently, not let his head bounce on the canvas, have his knees up in the air to start the count, relax them to the canvas, and shade his eyes from the sun with his forearm as he was counted out after a Heavyweight fight that was as tame as any ever seen, and certainly not a brutal clash like Johnson-Jeffries. Are you getting all this Chuck???

Chuck???? … Please read newspaper article http://www.perno.com/Boxing/WJ2.pdf especially paragraph 8 with the heading “actual knockout doubted” ... the newspaper states that certainly no real KO happened... Then read under the next heading where it states that neither man was badly marked or showed evidence of being in a Heavyweight Fight... and that no Heavyweight fight was “less brutal” ... Also read that the ending dazed spectators and came after 3 rounds of “almost complete idleness” on the part of both Johnson and Willard. This fight was heading nowhere -- as Johnson was awaiting signals from his wife’s box and idling about to cat calls of “DO SOMETHING” and “FAKE”
I know it won't matter but...

You do realize you can clearly see the punch landing in the video shared on the previous page of this thread don't you?
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

BULLCRAP!!! Strictly your imagination seeing things that don't exist... Why do you think ringsiders thought it was a fake and no KO punch landed???
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by punchoutsb »

Kalan wrote:BULLCRAP!!! Strictly your imagination seeing things that don't exist... Why do you think ringsiders thought it was a fake and no KO punch landed???
Its literally right on screen. Literally. You see the head bounce when the punch lands. It's clear at full speed but if it helps you process that many moving parts you can slow it down to quarter speed.

Anyway, that's the time Jess Willard knocked out Jack Johnson.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

BULLCRAP!!! ... Have you ever seen an actor on stage pull his head back from a punch that doesn't make contact, but kind of looks like it lands??? ... There is NO still photo of the punch connecting... and NO slo-mo of the punch connecting... In sharp contrast to Johnson's fights with Ketchel and Jeffries where he lands vicious punches flooring both Ketchel and Jeffries and Dempsey's fight with Willard where he literally beats his immobile head in. The article states that the KO punch was in doubt and Johnson most certainly was NOT knocked out. That's how dubious it looked to ringsiders.

http://www.perno.com/Boxing/WJ2.pdf

In fact in the newspaper article it STATES that NEITHER boxer was badly marked or suffered the punishment you'd expect of men who just engaged in a Heavyweight Fight... That's because Johnson was very difficult to hit -- and he deliberately pulled his punches to avoid an accidental KO of Willard.
Last edited by Kalan on 04 May 2017, 18:13, edited 1 time in total.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18491
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Caractacus »

punchoutsb wrote:
Kalan wrote:BULLCRAP!!! Strictly your imagination seeing things that don't exist... Why do you think ringsiders thought it was a fake and no KO punch landed???
Its literally right on screen. Literally. You see the head bounce when the punch lands. It's clear at full speed but if it helps you process that many moving parts you can slow it down to quarter speed.

Anyway, that's the time Jess Willard knocked out Jack Johnson.
Yeah,there looks to be a blur in the film frames when Willard lands his "Cyclonic overhand" right.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

Yeah a blur all right... Very convenient... You can see KO shots in other slo-mos and still shots but not in Johnson-Willard fight where ringsiders were stunned by the sudden finish of the fight because no good punch seemed to have landed and the KO was doubted. And Willard sent word to his wife to vacate the arena prior to the 26th round after not minding her presence there earlier. The fight was over and you can see him setting up the fake KO after looking at her box to make sure she was gone... Immediately after that he fakes the KO without letting his head bounce on the canvas.

http://www.perno.com/Boxing/WJ2.pdf
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by punchoutsb »

The only blur was in Johnson's head when Big Jess dropped him out for the count :clap:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I'd be pretty pissed if I had to fight that many rounds in the heat to take a dive. :roll:
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

punchoutsb wrote:The only blur was in Johnson's head when Big Jess dropped him out for the count :clap:
How about the blur between your ears... Caractacus "Yeah,there looks to be a blur in the film frames when Willard lands his "Cyclonic overhand" right"

The fans at ringside pretty much knew Johnson faked the KO... There was a lot of discussion about it and the consensus was Johnson laid down and almost certainly no KO punch landed.. http://www.perno.com/Boxing/WJ2.pdf ... Check out this newspaper report 8th paragraph.

They made it out that Johnson was exhausted, so he took a dive... But how can you be exhausted if both boxers took the last 5 rounds off -- including 3 rounds of "Almost complete idleness" -- and neither boxer was badly marked or showed "evidence to being in a Heavyweight Championship Fight??"

I love how all this evidence is not commented on by anyone doubting Johnson's version of events.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by punchoutsb »

Kalan wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:The only blur was in Johnson's head when Big Jess dropped him out for the count :clap:
How about the blur between your ears... Caractacus "Yeah,there looks to be a blur in the film frames when Willard lands his "Cyclonic overhand" right"

The fans at ringside pretty much knew Johnson faked the KO... There was a lot of discussion about it and the consensus was Johnson laid down and almost certainly no KO punch landed.. http://www.perno.com/Boxing/WJ2.pdf ... Check out this newspaper report 8th paragraph.

They made it out that Johnson was exhausted, so he took a dive... But how can you be exhausted if both boxers took the last 5 rounds off -- including 3 rounds of "Almost complete idleness" -- and neither boxer was badly marked or showed "evidence to being in a Heavyweight Championship Fight??"

I love how all this evidence is not commented on by anyone doubting Johnson's version of events.
One newspaper article =/= "all this evidence". Watch the video, watch the right hand land, watch Johnson fall, and then cry :TU:
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

One newspaper article??? ... These are the news articles (that's plural) of the day that Willard supporters and Johnson detractors posted -- not me.

And they don't contradict the film, where the KO punch looks as phony as a 3 dollar bill... A inept swinger facing a master boxer -- who happens to be Heavyweight Champion of the World for the last 7 years -- can't land anything decent... He does virtually no damage as he's out-punched 10-1 for 20 rounds in a woefully inactive contest fought at a snail's pace... Then virtually no action at all for the next 5 rounds as the fans hoot and holler and tell the boxers to do something... After the 25th, Johnson sends word to his wife to exit the arena because he's ending the "fight" in the next round...

In the 26th, Johnson grabs Willard into a powerful clinch, tying up both of his arms.. The newspapers report that he looks to his wife's box.. Johnson moves Willard all the way around in a circle to get a better view of his wife's box while Willard tries three times to free himself, but lacks the strength to do so.. Sure enough Johnson's wife was exiting the arena.. Johnson moves back inviting a straight right.. Willard throws a weak one to the belt-line and Johnson invites another.. Willard loads and throws a punch which everyone and his mother can see.. The type of loaded lead nobody hits a master boxer with, especially not an inept cow puncher.. No contact with Johnson's chin can be seen in any film or heard by ringsiders, who are very doubtful that a KO blow landed.. Johnson lowers himself gently to the canvas his head not bouncing and his knees up in the air.. As the count progresses he relaxes his legs and shades his eyes from the sun with his right forearm...as his right glove is resting on his left... Neither boxer is badly marked or shows evidence of being in a Heavyweight fight -- reported in the newspapers to be one of the less brutal Heavyweight contests ever held.. A 24-karat phony all the way.
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18491
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Caractacus »

yes,part of Willard's teams plan was to allow Jack Johnson to wear and tire himself out in the first 15 rounds
and then they start making their move.
like having Willard lean his weight ( 240 lbs) on Johnson and not resisiting when Johnson tried out-muscling him in the clinches.
Why would Jack Johnson even try to wrestle with Willard in clinches ?
He was probably just trying to show off to the audience and movie cameras because he felt so frustrated because he knew the title was slipping away
from him after definately trying to end the contest in the 20th round with the flurry of punches.
(Jim J. Jeffries earlier had also tried to man-handle Jack Johnson by picking him off the floor in a clinch in his fight in Reno (Nevada)
when he knew he was loosing too.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

Caractacus wrote:yes,part of Willard's teams plan was to allow Jack Johnson to wear and tire himself out in the first 15 rounds and then they start making their move. like having Willard lean his weight ( 240 lbs) on Johnson and not resisiting when Johnson tried out-muscling him in the clinches.
Why would Jack Johnson even try to wrestle with Willard in clinches ? He was probably just trying to show off to the audience and movie cameras because he felt so frustrated because he knew the title was slipping away from him after definately trying to end the contest in the 20th round with the flurry of punches.(Jim J. Jeffries earlier had also tried to man-handle Jack Johnson by picking him off the floor in a clinch in his fight in Reno (Nevada) when he knew he was loosing too.
More LOADS of FULL ON BS from Caractacus.

Willard didn't weigh 240... and he didn't lean his weight on Johnson a lot.. Johnson didn't try to out-muscle Willard in the clinches.. Johnson was peppering Willard with punches and Willard's only defense was grabbing and wrestling.. Johnson didn't need to grab.. He didn't need to "show off" for the audience and movie cameras.. Johnson was out-punching Willard 10-1.. Willard was the man who needed to show off because he lost the first 20 rounds badly.. Johnson wasn't tiring himself out because neither man was marked up in a way a real combatant would be in an actual Heavyweight Fight.

If Johnson was tiring why wasn't Willard pressing the action??? ... Willard did virtually nothing from round 21 through round 25... In rounds 23, 24, and 25, the 2 boxers were almost completely idle according to newspaper accounts... I guess the minute between rounds wasn't enough rest for them.. They needed the other 3 minutes to rest up as well.. The fans were pretty damned frustrated with all the posing and were hooting and hollering at the boxers to do something.. Johnson finally did something.. He faked getting a highly suspicious KO shot and took a dive.. Ringsiders did not believe it though.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by punchoutsb »

Kalan wrote:
Caractacus wrote:yes,part of Willard's teams plan was to allow Jack Johnson to wear and tire himself out in the first 15 rounds and then they start making their move. like having Willard lean his weight ( 240 lbs) on Johnson and not resisiting when Johnson tried out-muscling him in the clinches.
Why would Jack Johnson even try to wrestle with Willard in clinches ? He was probably just trying to show off to the audience and movie cameras because he felt so frustrated because he knew the title was slipping away from him after definately trying to end the contest in the 20th round with the flurry of punches.(Jim J. Jeffries earlier had also tried to man-handle Jack Johnson by picking him off the floor in a clinch in his fight in Reno (Nevada) when he knew he was loosing too.
More LOADS of FULL ON BS from Caractacus.

Willard didn't weigh 240... and he didn't lean his weight on Johnson a lot.. Johnson didn't try to out-muscle Willard in the clinches.. Johnson was peppering Willard with punches and Willard's only defense was grabbing and wrestling.. Johnson didn't need to grab.. He didn't need to "show off" for the audience and movie cameras.. Johnson was out-punching Willard 10-1.. Willard was the man who needed to show off because he lost the first 20 rounds badly.. Johnson wasn't tiring himself out because neither man was marked up in a way a real combatant would be in an actual Heavyweight Fight.

If Johnson was tiring why wasn't Willard pressing the action??? ... Willard did virtually nothing from round 21 through round 25... In rounds 23, 24, and 25, the 2 boxers were almost completely idle according to newspaper accounts... I guess the minute between rounds wasn't enough rest for them.. They needed the other 3 minutes to rest up as well.. The fans were pretty damned frustrated with all the posing and were hooting and hollering at the boxers to do something.. Johnson finally did something.. He faked getting a highly suspicious KO shot and took a dive.. Ringsiders did not believe it though.
Willard weighed 238.5 to the fight; if you think that 1.5 pounds difference changes Caractacus point then well, you're just being you :TU:

Also, why press the action when you're fighting a 45 round bout? I know you don't know much about boxing but pacing is very important. After all, in worked in this fight when Jess Willard KO'd Jack Johnson :box:
Caractacus
Super Welterweight
Posts: 18491
Joined: 13 Jun 2014, 16:47

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Caractacus »

I'm sure a lot of the film footage was removed in the final cut ,that is left available to us over the years anyway.
Because if the fight went 26 rounds.
26x3 = 78 minutes,
plus at least 24 x 1 one minute rests between rounds .
if my math is correct that would be approx total combined
about 102 minues (= 1 hour 42 minutes) of the time when the bell rang to begin round one
until the referee raised Big Jess's arm in the ring ( because it didn't look like he stuck around in the ring for the annoucement).
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

punchoutsb wrote:
Kalan wrote:
Caractacus wrote:yes,part of Willard's teams plan was to allow Jack Johnson to wear and tire himself out in the first 15 rounds and then they start making their move. like having Willard lean his weight ( 240 lbs) on Johnson and not resisiting when Johnson tried out-muscling him in the clinches.
Why would Jack Johnson even try to wrestle with Willard in clinches ? He was probably just trying to show off to the audience and movie cameras because he felt so frustrated because he knew the title was slipping away from him after definately trying to end the contest in the 20th round with the flurry of punches.(Jim J. Jeffries earlier had also tried to man-handle Jack Johnson by picking him off the floor in a clinch in his fight in Reno (Nevada) when he knew he was loosing too.
More LOADS of FULL ON BS from Caractacus.

Willard didn't weigh 240... and he didn't lean his weight on Johnson a lot.. Johnson didn't try to out-muscle Willard in the clinches.. Johnson was peppering Willard with punches and Willard's only defense was grabbing and wrestling.. Johnson didn't need to grab.. He didn't need to "show off" for the audience and movie cameras.. Johnson was out-punching Willard 10-1.. Willard was the man who needed to show off because he lost the first 20 rounds badly.. Johnson wasn't tiring himself out because neither man was marked up in a way a real combatant would be in an actual Heavyweight Fight.

If Johnson was tiring why wasn't Willard pressing the action??? ... Willard did virtually nothing from round 21 through round 25... In rounds 23, 24, and 25, the 2 boxers were almost completely idle according to newspaper accounts... I guess the minute between rounds wasn't enough rest for them.. They needed the other 3 minutes to rest up as well.. The fans were pretty damned frustrated with all the posing and were hooting and hollering at the boxers to do something.. Johnson finally did something.. He faked getting a highly suspicious KO shot and took a dive.. Ringsiders did not believe it though.
Willard weighed 238.5 to the fight; if you think that 1.5 pounds difference changes Caractacus point

Also, why press the action when you're fighting a 45 round bout?
If he weighed 238 SAY he weighed 238.. Don't pad his weight and his height to push your phony argument.. Willard already weighed more than usual for a fight and the heaviest he'd ever been.. in fact, they were both fat and out-of-shape because they both knew the fight was a tank job.. A year earlier Willard weighed 225 as he was getting beaten by a green-horned Light Heavyweight.. That's probably closer to his natural weight.

And why press the action??? Why not just stroll around the parameter of the ring -- and not box at all -- if you know you're going to win anyway??? You have to do something to fake an actual fight.. But if the fight was real, and you lost the first 20 rounds, you need to pick it up.. Especially if your opponent isn't doing anything but standing there.. By all accounts there was almost complete idleness from the boxers in the 23rd, 24th, and 25th rounds -- followed by a KO in the 26th that ringsiders thought was fake as Hell -- for good reasons.

Sounds like you know ZERO about boxing because you'd know that ringsiders considered the KO a fake -- and that no master boxer gets hit with a loaded lead right from a rube like Willard... And that no still photo or slo-mo exists showing the KO punch making contact with Willard's chin or jaw.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by punchoutsb »

Kalan wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Kalan wrote:
More LOADS of FULL ON BS from Caractacus.

Willard didn't weigh 240... and he didn't lean his weight on Johnson a lot.. Johnson didn't try to out-muscle Willard in the clinches.. Johnson was peppering Willard with punches and Willard's only defense was grabbing and wrestling.. Johnson didn't need to grab.. He didn't need to "show off" for the audience and movie cameras.. Johnson was out-punching Willard 10-1.. Willard was the man who needed to show off because he lost the first 20 rounds badly.. Johnson wasn't tiring himself out because neither man was marked up in a way a real combatant would be in an actual Heavyweight Fight.

If Johnson was tiring why wasn't Willard pressing the action??? ... Willard did virtually nothing from round 21 through round 25... In rounds 23, 24, and 25, the 2 boxers were almost completely idle according to newspaper accounts... I guess the minute between rounds wasn't enough rest for them.. They needed the other 3 minutes to rest up as well.. The fans were pretty damned frustrated with all the posing and were hooting and hollering at the boxers to do something.. Johnson finally did something.. He faked getting a highly suspicious KO shot and took a dive.. Ringsiders did not believe it though.
Willard weighed 238.5 to the fight; if you think that 1.5 pounds difference changes Caractacus point

Also, why press the action when you're fighting a 45 round bout?
If he weighed 238 SAY he weighed 238.. Don't pad his weight and his height to push your phony argument.. Willard already weighed more than usual for a fight and the heaviest he'd ever been.. in fact, they were both fat and out-of-shape because they both knew the fight was a tank job.. A year earlier Willard weighed 225 as he was getting beaten by a green-horned Light Heavyweight.. That's probably closer to his natural weight.

And why press the action??? Why not just stroll around the parameter of the ring -- and not box at all -- if you know you're going to win anyway??? You have to do something to fake an actual fight.. But if the fight was real, and you lost the first 20 rounds, you need to pick it up.. Especially if your opponent isn't doing anything but standing there.. By all accounts there was almost complete idleness from the boxers in the 23rd, 24th, and 25th rounds -- followed by a KO in the 26th that ringsiders thought was fake as Hell -- for good reasons.

Sounds like you know ZERO about boxing because you'd know that ringsiders considered the KO a fake -- and that no master boxer gets hit with a loaded lead right from a rube like Willard... And that no still photo or slo-mo exists showing the KO punch making contact with Willard's chin or jaw.
He didn't weight 238, he weighed 238.5 :OhYes:

The rest of your blah blah blah is very ignorable as is the rest of your blah blah blah. I wish the library you post at hadn't fixed the computers; I quite liked when you weren't posting here.

Oh yeah, one more thing:
Image
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: Jess Willard vrs Jack Johnson/100th Anniversary

Post by Kalan »

punchoutsb wrote:
Kalan wrote:
punchoutsb wrote:
Willard weighed 238.5 to the fight; if you think that 1.5 pounds difference changes Caractacus point

Also, why press the action when you're fighting a 45 round bout?
If he weighed 238 SAY he weighed 238.. Don't pad his weight and his height to push your phony argument.. Willard already weighed more than usual for a fight and the heaviest he'd ever been.. in fact, they were both fat and out-of-shape because they both knew the fight was a tank job.. A year earlier Willard weighed 225 as he was getting beaten by a green-horned Light Heavyweight.. That's probably closer to his natural weight.

And why press the action??? Why not just stroll around the parameter of the ring -- and not box at all -- if you know you're going to win anyway??? You have to do something to fake an actual fight.. But if the fight was real, and you lost the first 20 rounds, you need to pick it up.. Especially if your opponent isn't doing anything but standing there.. By all accounts there was almost complete idleness from the boxers in the 23rd, 24th, and 25th rounds -- followed by a KO in the 26th that ringsiders thought was fake as Hell -- for good reasons.

Sounds like you know ZERO about boxing because you'd know that ringsiders considered the KO a fake -- and that no master boxer gets hit with a loaded lead right from a rube like Willard... And that no still photo or slo-mo exists showing the KO punch making contact with Willard's chin or jaw.
He didn't weight 238, he weighed 238.5 :OhYes:

The rest of your blah blah blah is very ignorable as is the rest of your blah blah blah. I wish the library you post at hadn't fixed the computers; I quite liked when you weren't posting here.

Oh yeah, one more thing:
Image
You've got no argument. You've got nothing but air between your ears... You're a troll who only wants to insult and make up your own facts.

According to sportswriters who attended the fight, the KO wasn't real.. 8th paragraph http://www.perno.com/Boxing/WJ2.pdf
Post Reply