What pattern do you feel the fight would have taken, and ultimately, who ends up victorious?
Cheers.
Do you want to read this part again and think about it for a moment?BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote: a peak mike tyson had possibly the best defense in heavyweight history.
tyson KO 5 Bowe
jack johnson had the best. but mike was up there. he was a master at making people miss. in his prime, he was hardly ever hit cleanly. his head movement was absolutley incredible and it was unpredictable unlike fraziers.Ezzard wrote:Do you want to read this part again and think about it for a moment?BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote: a peak mike tyson had possibly the best defense in heavyweight history.
tyson KO 5 BoweI know Mike wasn't stationary. I know in the first 4 rounds he was hard to hit cleanly but after that he was right there. Best defence ever? Not even close. What is this based on? That clip of Reggie Gross that someone posted?
The thing is you seem to define his prime as any fight he won easily and dismiss any other fight as post-prime.BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:jack johnson had the best. but mike was up there. he was a master at making people miss. in his prime, he was hardly ever hit cleanly. his head movement was absolutley incredible and it was unpredictable unlike fraziers.Ezzard wrote:Do you want to read this part again and think about it for a moment?BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote: a peak mike tyson had possibly the best defense in heavyweight history.
tyson KO 5 BoweI know Mike wasn't stationary. I know in the first 4 rounds he was hard to hit cleanly but after that he was right there. Best defence ever? Not even close. What is this based on? That clip of Reggie Gross that someone posted?
People don't feel the need to criticise Bowe because there aren't a legion of posters trying to claim he's the second coming. You're trying to make it sound like anyone criticising Mike has got a personal grudge, which is nonsense.BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:its a myth that tyson struggled with tall boxers with good jabs. you guys base everything on the douglas fight and tyson was not the same fighter he once was.
tyson dominated these 4 tall skilled boxers who had goob jabs
larry holmes
tyrell biggs- this was when biggs was very good unlike post tyson
pinklon thomas
tony tucker
- you guys like to critisize tyson but why not critisize bowe? look at the holyfield fights, bowe got hit an awful lot. bowe showed in these fights he was not hard to hit, and a master counterpuncher and deadly combination puncher like mike tyson will use bowe as a human punching bag at mid range. bowes chin wasnt exactley royally tested in his career. holyfield and golota showed you how dentable it was. tyson would flatten bowe.
tysons combination of speed, power will be too much for bowe to handle. tyson will be beating bowe to the punch the entire fight, and be counterpunching bowe's bombs with rapid powerful combinations that bowe would not be able to handle. tyson had great head movement and he will slip bowe's jab most of the fight.
tyson TKO 5 bowe
- funny how people critisize tyson for the douglas, yet dont critisize bowe for fighting 10 even rounds with a fat far past his prime tony tubbs. incidently, a prime tubbs was flattened in 2 easy rounds by mike tyson.
Seamus wrote:Tony Tucker took a peak Tyson out of his fight plan with one punch in the 1st round of there 1987 fight and made him respect his power for the duration of the bout. Bonecrusher Smith wobbled a peak Tyson in the final minute of there unification bout the same year with his only real punch of the fight. Riddick Bowe dealt with adversity alot better than Tyson, who thrived on his opponent being terrified. A peak Bowe might take some punishment early on, but the first time he hits Tyson solidly, it would take alot of the agression out of Iron Make. Bowe TKO 11.
Arsenal wrote:BB49 I respect you and think you know alot about boxing. BUT when it comes to Tyson you talk b*ll*ks! Sorry to say that but I can't believe some of the drivel you come out with. You use an old, past his prime, inactive Holmes to back up your opinions of Tyson. I doubt Tyson would have done that to Holmes in his prime. As for Biggs he had only had 15 fights when he fought Tyson and 2 years laster was battered by Gary Mason who would struggle to get into the top 10 Britsh HW. So using him is ridiculous. Look at the facts not what you want to look at. Tyson had great physical attributes and I think hewould give most fighters in any era a good fight. He dominated the HW scene and cleaned it up. BUT he always struggled against big guys who weren't scared. He dominated a weak era and got beat by the biggest underdog in history! When the going got tough Tyson crumbled. He was good and would make a top 15 HW all time time list. But he had so many flaws that were eventually exploited. I really disliked Bowe and don't think he was that good but I think he would have to much size and power along with not being intimidated to beat Tyson in the later rounds after Tyson lost heart after not taking him out early.
tyson ruined briggs he was never the same after the tyson fight. kinda like rex layne with rocky marciano, never the same after. briggs was a good fighter when he fought tyson.As for Biggs he had only had 15 fights when he fought Tyson and 2 years laster was battered by Gary Mason who would struggle to get into the top 10 Britsh HW. So using him is ridiculous.
BUT he always struggled against big guys who weren't scared.
He dominated a weak era