What's he said now?darkstar81 wrote:Bellew is an idiot
Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16390
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Listen to Boomer and Khan.
What about the Stevenson fight? Didn't think a huge heart was shown in that one.
What about the Stevenson fight? Didn't think a huge heart was shown in that one.
-
darkstar81
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 390
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
No one is saying he didn't quit. Obviously Kell quit.
You and Bellew are saying he shouldn't have.
You and Bellew are saying he shouldn't have.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Bellew and Khan are talking rubbish here.
Bellew did a similar thing against Stevenson by turning his back, and Khan has never been given the chance to quit as he has already been KO'd.
Bellew did a similar thing against Stevenson by turning his back, and Khan has never been given the chance to quit as he has already been KO'd.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Not sure about Nelson and Bellew saying he shouldn't have quit.
It's easy to say "fight until you've got no fight" when it's not you that could have had to spend the next 40-50yrs with one eye.
It's easy to say "fight until you've got no fight" when it's not you that could have had to spend the next 40-50yrs with one eye.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
sammy95 wrote:and Khan has never been given the chance to quit as he has already been KO'd.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Khan makes Froch sound like Einstein.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Hang on, what is the problem with the word 'quit'?
If used without judgement it is accurate. He could not see and turned away, took a knee and decided to not fight on.
If used without judgement it is accurate. He could not see and turned away, took a knee and decided to not fight on.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
BigGar wrote:Listen to Boomer and Khan.
What about the Stevenson fight? Didn't think a huge heart was shown in that one.
-
Fearful_Freddie
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 883
- Joined: 05 Nov 2008, 23:36
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
An utter and total one.darkstar81 wrote:Bellew is an idiot
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Of course he shouldn't have quit. If he was worried about the eye the doctor should have looked at in between rounds and his corner should have pulled him out. He fights until the the ref stops it or the corner throw in the towel.darkstar81 wrote:No one is saying he didn't quit. Obviously Kell quit.
You and Bellew are saying he shouldn't have.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
For he second time ever I'll give Eddie some credit, I just heard his interview on the radio, excellent interview
-
manchester-mexican
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 247
- Joined: 15 Jul 2007, 11:18
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Tbh he did quitBaboon wrote:Yes, and Khan is an opportunistic pudendum, calling him a quitter.....darkstar81 wrote:Bellew is an idiot
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Listen to Bellew! Wasn't he ready to "die in dat dare ring" against Stevenson?
And what happened?
Cheeky sod.
And what happened?
Cheeky sod.
-
darkstar81
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 390
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
What the fornicate is Bellew talking about?
I don't think Kell was worried about being knocked down. He was worried about taking serious damage to his eye.
I don't think Kell was worried about being knocked down. He was worried about taking serious damage to his eye.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13360
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Belles talks about how if you get knocked down you have to get up and you hear Amir go 'yeah' in the background. Khans ended a night on his back more often than a £2 hooker ffs.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
I wouldn't give Brook any grief about his decision to call it a night. Considering he's coming off an eye injury that required surgery in his last fight I'm sure anybody would avoid receiving another serious eye injury that could potentially lead to surgery if they could. Being laid up in the hospital getting surgeries kinda sucks.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
It was depends what you like when scoring. I had Spence winning throughout the fight. There were a lot of swing rounds in there but I prefered Spences' work.sammy95 wrote:Most of the first six were tight rounds, but five ahead is wrong. Those scorecards suggest Brook only won 2/3 roundsDeno1986 wrote:No it wasn't. Plenty here had Spence up by 4/5+sammy95 wrote:Judges had Spence up by five, three, and one.
One, correct as per my scorecard. Three understandable, so many close rounds. Five, wrong.
-
Jackson328
- Middleweight
- Posts: 411
- Joined: 14 Nov 2013, 14:51
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
IT wrote:Spence not spencer!! Ffs
I had Brook 4-2 up after 6 but couldn't give him another round after that and Spence was timing him more and more making a stoppage inevitable especially with the eye damage hindering Brook. Kell did seem to tire badly at the halfway point, whether that was the weight issue or just Spence's pace and aggression I don't know, maybe both, but 147 is surely in the past for Brook now.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
So? He's never quit has he, when he could he's gotten up. You're criticising a boxer for getting knocked out now.jameswilson wrote:Belles talks about how if you get knocked down you have to get up and you hear Amir go 'yeah' in the background. Khans ended a night on his back more often than a £2 hooker ffs.
-
darkstar81
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 390
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
Don't be an idiot. Not all fighters need to be saved from themselves. Brook was against Golovkin, and here he decided to save himself.Finn wrote:Of course he shouldn't have quit. If he was worried about the eye the doctor should have looked at in between rounds and his corner should have pulled him out. He fights until the the ref stops it or the corner throw in the towel.darkstar81 wrote:No one is saying he didn't quit. Obviously Kell quit.
You and Bellew are saying he shouldn't have.
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
I've always slagged Bellew (pre haye) for going down v Stevenson but if you look back at footage he looks like a rakesammy95 wrote:Bellew and Khan are talking rubbish here.
Bellew did a similar thing against Stevenson by turning his back, and Khan has never been given the chance to quit as he has already been KO'd.
Khan doesn't want Brook, even now
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
There's nowt wrong with quitting when you make money.
-
darkstar81
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 390
- Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 19:52
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
I have no doubt Khan would fight Spence.
I have no doubt Khan would get knocked out by Spence.
I have no doubt Khan would get knocked out by Spence.
-
pablothunder
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1155
- Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 07:38
Re: Round-By-Round - Kell Brook vs. Errol Spence - May 27th 2017
We all thought Nelson should have been more entertaining, and that Bellew shouldn't have shat it when Stevenson responded to him at the weigh in.Stuffs wrote:Not sure about Nelson and Bellew saying he shouldn't have quit.
It's easy to say "fight until you've got no fight" when it's not you that could have had to spend the next 40-50yrs with one eye.