Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

Post by crusader »

Coco wrote:I've still not seen anything in Cox which suggests he can be anything like what his supporters on her are suggesting. I am still to see something which suggest he can win a domestic title at the higher weight. For me Fielding and the Smiths beat him.
Yep, pretty much nothing he's done as a pro suggests that he'd do what his supporters claim. Time after time he puts in showing that fall well short of it, and at almost 31 he's still beaten nobody.

I notice that his supporters haven't been as noisy since Saturday; maybe they realize it's outlandish to act like Cox would surely walk through guys like Fielding when he can't even do it to blown up Lewis Taylor.
Last edited by crusader on 28 May 2017, 16:38, edited 1 time in total.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32957
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

Post by Boxerbeetle »

crusader wrote:
Coco wrote:I've still not seen anything in Cox which suggests he can be anything like what his supporters on her are suggesting. I am still to see something which suggest he can win a domestic title at the higher weight. For me Fielding and the Smiths beat him.
Yep, pretty much nothing he's done as a pro suggests that he'd do what his supporters claim. Time after time he puts in showing that fall well short of it, and at almost 31 he's still beaten nobody.

I notice that his supporters haven't been as noisy since Saturday; maybe even they realize that it's outlandish to act like Cox walks through guys like Fielding when he can't even do it to blown up Lewis Taylor.
Cox is a strange one...how many more times can his performances realistically be put down to 'having an off night'? He can look good in spells, but perhaps he will just never be able to do it consistently at a high level.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

Post by crusader »

Cox's 'on' nights seem to coincidentally occur when he's facing poor opponents who've been stopped numerous times; strange one, that :lol:
horndawg80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 486
Joined: 26 Apr 2011, 00:25

Re: Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

Post by horndawg80 »

So is this back on now rocky is definitely on the brook undercard?
Webbo911
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 572
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 07:18

Re: Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

Post by Webbo911 »

horndawg80 wrote: 07 Feb 2018, 14:19 So is this back on now rocky is definitely on the brook undercard?
Only an 8 rounder on the Brook card.

Possible for the Bellew V Haye undercard?

Needs to happen so one of them can move to bigger things.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26652
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

Post by KiwiRider »

It's on! :yay:
The whole card is very decent indeed. Brooke is going to be out shined by the undercard entertainment.
higgs88
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 194
Joined: 14 Aug 2009, 07:38

Re: Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

Post by higgs88 »

KiwiRider wrote: 07 Feb 2018, 16:15 It's on! :yay:
The whole card is very decent indeed. Brooke is going to be out shined by the undercard entertainment.
the undercard is sh*t! Dave Allen is like watching paint dry.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Jamie Cox Vs. Rocky Fielding

Post by bripez »

higgs88 wrote: 08 Feb 2018, 04:41
KiwiRider wrote: 07 Feb 2018, 16:15 It's on! :yay:
The whole card is very decent indeed. Brooke is going to be out shined by the undercard entertainment.
the undercard is sh*t! Dave Allen is like watching paint dry.
I agree - he comes across ok on Twitter (apart from the I am the hardest bloke in Doncaster, I was the cock of my school shite) but needs to be more active and maybe throw a few punches when he fights.
Post Reply