Haskins v Burnett

Post Reply

Who wins ?

Haskins
33
52%
Burnett
31
48%
 
Total votes: 64

Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Neil Gee »

I make it 4-2 Starkey without the two ridiculous point deductions. With them I make it a draw.
Stuffs
Welterweight
Posts: 611
Joined: 29 Jun 2016, 06:28

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Stuffs »

Felt Starkey should have had one off for holding but two was harsh. Ultimately though, let's just be glad it's over.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by rossij8 »

Without the ridiculous point reductions, should have been a draw

Poor referee

Feel tired after that
Matt Teague
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 318
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Matt Teague »

I wonder who that referee wanted to win
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by BitPlayer »

Stuffs wrote:Felt Starkey should have had one off for holding but two was harsh. Ultimately though, let's just be glad it's over.
But he didn't even properly warn him for it.
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Neil Gee »

rossij8 wrote:Without the ridiculous point reductions, should have been a draw

Poor referee

Feel tired after that
Snap!

The ref had McGoldrick a mile ahead anyway. He only gave Starkey one round. It's not like he needed to make any deductions to help the favourite along.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by rossij8 »

Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23111
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by handsofstone »

rossij8 wrote:Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
"GET OFF MY LAND"
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Boxing Prospect »

One of the most respected referees in the world? hahahahahahaha
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I only saw Burnett once, liked his body work. Cheering for him.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by rossij8 »

handsofstone wrote:
rossij8 wrote:Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
"GET OFF MY LAND"
:lol: :bag:
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by chiggsy »

RYAN RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRNEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHH
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4482
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by dookus »

"The playboy"?
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by boxingknockout »

dookus wrote:"The playboy"?
The 5ft1 100 pound playboy who's never had a girlfriend apart from his wife :lol:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Horse »

10-9 Haskins
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Neil Gee »

I can't split them in the first, just feeling each other out.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Tarkus »

Burnett has Booth style written all over him. Nice little fighter.
ProMayhem
Super Welterweight
Posts: 197
Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 18:23

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by ProMayhem »

Bad cut that
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Tarkus »

Burnett 2-0.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Horse »

19-19 Even
Neil Gee
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Neil Gee »

Damn cuts! I give Haskins second.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by rossij8 »

The home crowd could play a part with scoring

You notice this more when you are supporting a fighter
robster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 181
Joined: 22 Jul 2007, 10:59

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by robster »

The judge with the grey hair & glasses wasn't even watching the fight there, he was studying some papers :stop:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Horse »

29-29 Even
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16796
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by skanksta »

I like Coldwell's comms - he picked up RB getting his range on his right lead straight away, (while I was giving the first to Haskins :doh: )

I got RB 39-37.

Burnett got this unless he walks in to one, looks bigger, slightly faster and setting a pace that LH will struggle with.
Add in home advantage, he looks home and hosed.
Last edited by skanksta on 10 Jun 2017, 17:31, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply