Haskins v Burnett
Re: Haskins v Burnett
I make it 4-2 Starkey without the two ridiculous point deductions. With them I make it a draw.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Felt Starkey should have had one off for holding but two was harsh. Ultimately though, let's just be glad it's over.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Without the ridiculous point reductions, should have been a draw
Poor referee
Feel tired after that
Poor referee
Feel tired after that
-
Matt Teague
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 318
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19
Re: Haskins v Burnett
I wonder who that referee wanted to win
Re: Haskins v Burnett
But he didn't even properly warn him for it.Stuffs wrote:Felt Starkey should have had one off for holding but two was harsh. Ultimately though, let's just be glad it's over.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Snap!rossij8 wrote:Without the ridiculous point reductions, should have been a draw
Poor referee
Feel tired after that
The ref had McGoldrick a mile ahead anyway. He only gave Starkey one round. It's not like he needed to make any deductions to help the favourite along.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23111
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Haskins v Burnett
"GET OFF MY LAND"rossij8 wrote:Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Haskins v Burnett
One of the most respected referees in the world? hahahahahahaha
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Haskins v Burnett
I only saw Burnett once, liked his body work. Cheering for him.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
handsofstone wrote:"GET OFF MY LAND"rossij8 wrote:Come on Haskins, fields need to be ploughed tomorrow, so make it an easy night!
Re: Haskins v Burnett
RYAN RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRNEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHH
-
boxingknockout
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 2856
- Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45
Re: Haskins v Burnett
The 5ft1 100 pound playboy who's never had a girlfriend apart from his wifedookus wrote:"The playboy"?
Re: Haskins v Burnett
I can't split them in the first, just feeling each other out.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Burnett has Booth style written all over him. Nice little fighter.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Bad cut that
Re: Haskins v Burnett
Damn cuts! I give Haskins second.
Re: Haskins v Burnett
The home crowd could play a part with scoring
You notice this more when you are supporting a fighter
You notice this more when you are supporting a fighter
Re: Haskins v Burnett
The judge with the grey hair & glasses wasn't even watching the fight there, he was studying some papers 
Re: Haskins v Burnett
I like Coldwell's comms - he picked up RB getting his range on his right lead straight away, (while I was giving the first to Haskins
)
I got RB 39-37.
Burnett got this unless he walks in to one, looks bigger, slightly faster and setting a pace that LH will struggle with.
Add in home advantage, he looks home and hosed.
I got RB 39-37.
Burnett got this unless he walks in to one, looks bigger, slightly faster and setting a pace that LH will struggle with.
Add in home advantage, he looks home and hosed.
Last edited by skanksta on 10 Jun 2017, 17:31, edited 1 time in total.