Haskins v Burnett

Who wins ?

Haskins
33
52%
Burnett
31
48%
 
Total votes: 64

skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16796
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by skanksta »

Andy Lee looks a weight div or more bigger than Dazzlin' Darren there - how the hell did he make Lt-Middle ?
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by rossij8 »

boxingknockout wrote:
samwbr wrote:Lee Haskins has got a big heart. Very brave performance.
Ryan Burnett different class tonight .
No he didn't. He was awful and considered quitting many times in the fight
How many times?
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16796
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by skanksta »

whatashambles wrote:Can't be accurate. Burnett scored two knockdowns so must have won two rounds 10-8. Therefore the max Haskins could have won is 116.
could've thought Haskins won those rounds and given them 10-9 to Burnett ?
That is so unlikely that it must be a mistake.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102264
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Eddie Hearn shed some light on the strange scorecard, saying that the scores had been put into the wrong box and that it should have been a unanimous decision.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23114
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by handsofstone »

boxingknockout wrote:
samwbr wrote:Lee Haskins has got a big heart. Very brave performance.
Ryan Burnett different class tonight .
No he didn't. He was awful and considered quitting many times in the fight
Haskins done his arm in the 6th and barely threw it for the rest of the fight, plenty of guys have retired on their stool with an arm injury, Lee showed plenty of heart to go 12 rounds where he never won a clear round and was eating some flush right hands all night

He was awful though
robster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 181
Joined: 22 Jul 2007, 10:59

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by robster »

Realistic wrote:
Tarkus wrote:
robster wrote:
I wonder if this is Clark Sammartino :doh:
He does have a white hair.

http://boxrec.com/person/401118

Clearly he mixed up the fighters. Thats the only explanation.
Thats an old picture.

If any of you recorded it just go to round 3 and watch from 2.30 left of the round. Have a look he seems totally confused; looking at the cards, putting them in some order. He just looks totally bewildered?

Yup, saw it originally & watched it back again. I think that's the answer, the guy had the boxers the wrong way round on his cards. I'm on round 4 now, & he's still glancing at the cards
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by MarkMcBurney »

skanksta wrote:
whatashambles wrote:Can't be accurate. Burnett scored two knockdowns so must have won two rounds 10-8. Therefore the max Haskins could have won is 116.
could've thought Haskins won those rounds and given them 10-9 to Burnett ?
That is so unlikely that it must be a mistake.
That wouldn't be how it works in a ten point must system, if a fighter wins the round but gets knocked down, it should be 10-10.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16796
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by skanksta »

Realistic wrote:
Tarkus wrote:
robster wrote:
I wonder if this is Clark Sammartino :doh:
He does have a white hair.

http://boxrec.com/person/401118

Clearly he mixed up the fighters. Thats the only explanation.
Thats an old picture.

If any of you recorded it just go to round 3 and watch from 2.30 left of the round. Have a look he seems totally confused; looking at the cards, putting them in some order. He just looks totally bewildered?
Probably checking who was who and getting it wrong - he was attentive in the later rounds.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23114
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by handsofstone »

Imagine that judge as a hitman :o
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16796
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by skanksta »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
skanksta wrote:
whatashambles wrote:Can't be accurate. Burnett scored two knockdowns so must have won two rounds 10-8. Therefore the max Haskins could have won is 116.
could've thought Haskins won those rounds and given them 10-9 to Burnett ?
That is so unlikely that it must be a mistake.
That wouldn't be how it works in a ten point must system, if a fighter wins the round but gets knocked down, it should be 10-10.
Coulda thought Haskins dominated the rounds 10-8 apart from the knockdowns ?
:lol:
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by rossij8 »

handsofstone wrote:
boxingknockout wrote:
samwbr wrote:Lee Haskins has got a big heart. Very brave performance.
Ryan Burnett different class tonight .
No he didn't. He was awful and considered quitting many times in the fight
Haskins done his arm in the 6th and barely threw it for the rest of the fight, plenty of guys have retired on their stool with an arm injury, Lee showed plenty of heart to go 12 rounds where he never won a clear round and was eating some flush right hands all night

He was awful though
^this but an injury like that makes you more awful?

Heart as always
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16796
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by skanksta »

handsofstone wrote:Imagine that judge as a hitman :o
:stop:
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by 3132DW »

robster wrote:
Realistic wrote:
Tarkus wrote: He does have a white hair.

http://boxrec.com/person/401118

Clearly he mixed up the fighters. Thats the only explanation.
Thats an old picture.

If any of you recorded it just go to round 3 and watch from 2.30 left of the round. Have a look he seems totally confused; looking at the cards, putting them in some order. He just looks totally bewildered?

Yup, saw it originally & watched it back again. I think that's the answer, the guy had the boxers the wrong way round on his cards. I'm on round 4 now, & he's still glancing at the cards
That's the only feasible explanation.
Realistic
Cruiserweight
Posts: 539
Joined: 20 May 2011, 10:06

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Realistic »

Good on Robert Smith saying he will never Judge in the sCountry again. IBF needs to take a serious look at this.
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Èire making dollar nigA. Fukin great night. Sd wtf. :bag:
boxingknockout
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 09 Sep 2016, 10:45

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by boxingknockout »

Haskins looked no better than an area champion. Burnett better but not great.

Haskins looked like a 3 fight amateur novice. Hopefully he'll disappear
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Horse »

boxingknockout wrote:Haskins looked no better than an area champion. Burnett better but not great.

Haskins looked like a 3 fight amateur novice. Hopefully he'll disappear
Hopefully, you'll disappear.
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Go on horse. Your adopted Irish :bag:
Boxing Prospect
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6592
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Boxing Prospect »

...and after that....we should all watch Haskins vs Jamoye...
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Ricky_ »

Shame Haskins can't dig a bit more, he was having great success banging uppercuts to the body but the seemed to gave no effect.

Booth really stamps his ID on a fighter.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10150
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by samwbr »

boxingknockout wrote:
samwbr wrote:Lee Haskins has got a big heart. Very brave performance.
Ryan Burnett different class tonight .
No he didn't. He was awful and considered quitting many times in the fight
How do you know what he was thinking.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by Andrew »

Overall very impressed with Burnett last night. Went up a few levels for me and he has the potential to be outstanding in a couple of years.

Say what you want about Haskins at least Ryan actually beat a belt holder as there are far too many fighters winning vacant belts these days.

Haskins is a tough tough man but I think that is the last we see of him.

Very good for boxing in Belfast last night. The atmosphere looked good throughout and the crowd were getting behind the undercard fighters.

As for Burnett's future Hearn said he has a mandatory v Emmanual Rodriguez ( never heard of him) may get a fight with McDonnel in first which would be interesting. Burnett has a belt but he is a distance from facing a Yamanaka ( WBC and ring magazine champion) or Zolani Tete. Great learning fight for him last night though.
3132DW
Middleweight
Posts: 1435
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 03:27

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by 3132DW »

Judge had fighters wrong way round - had 2 x 10-8's on the card - journo said he thought he had them mixed up and was scoring Haskins as Burnett and vice versa as he was totally confused when tallying up the scores.

Looks like he didn't know who was who which in a World Title fight is pretty incredible.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23114
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Haskins v Burnett

Post by handsofstone »

Surely Hall or Malinga must be mandatories again soon
Post Reply