RScarf1 wrote:Enlightened-One wrote:RScarf1 wrote:What is their sanctioning fee going to be? Would Mayweather and McGregor agree to give the WBC a percentage? I know Mayweather likes the WBC, but it would be millions of dollars. People that think this fight is a farce will consider the WBC as lacking in credibility if they are involved with a belt.
Isn't the sanctioning fee a standard rate of 3% of each fighters' purses for all WBC title belt contests?
This means that the greedy WBC would pocket at least $6m by sanctioning this bout (under the assumption that the combined purse total is at least $200m).
I know the standard is 3%, but this is a diamond belt, so maybe they would be even more greedy and want a higher percentage.
You could be right, but what you're suggesting requires a rule change, since the percentage is cast-in-stone according to their rule-book.
So if the WBC decided to implement a special one-off change to their rules, by demanding a higher percentage specifically for the Mayweather-McGregor fight, then I highly-doubt that either fighter would consider the WBC's involvement in their super-fight.
I honestly don't believe that the Mayweather-McGregor bout requires any of the sports' big four governing bodies to be involved in order to legitimise this contest, since at least 4m merely casual and mildly curious sports combat fans (in general) will inevitably pay Showtime's PPV fees in order to watch this bout, even if both men were only vying for the right to possess the Barbie doll pink princess diva belt!
The WBC appear to be a profit-making organisation, whereby they persistently seek opportunities to award belts for highly-lucrative fights as long as their sanctioning fees are paid in return, even if the fighters involved don't even possess a world ranking, which I feel undermines their credibility and purpose.