Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - OFF
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
I doubt this fight is going to happen after the IBF orders an immediate rematch for Dirrell
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Think you've got the wrong Dirrell mate. That's his brother Andre.KiwiRider wrote:I doubt this fight is going to happen after the IBF orders an immediate rematch for Dirrell
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Talk of this being off now 
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23132
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
I will believe Callum will fight someone decent when I see him in the ring.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/anthony-dirr ... nt--118032
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Me too!gilgamesh wrote:Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/anthony-dirr ... nt--118032
But isn't that the flip side of boxing.
To cheer for your favourites, and to cheer for anyone to beat guys like Dirrell's, Money weather, Aduckis, Broner, Wilder perhaps
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Yeah. I find it's a more enjoyable viewing experience to be watching a guy you hate as opposed to a guy you feel nothing about. It's always a little more fun when you have some sort of emotional investment in the outcome. It's fun regardless though usually.KiwiRider wrote:Me too!gilgamesh wrote:Of course that's what he's doing. The Dirrell's are the biggest bunch of p*ssies I've ever seen in this sport. I'll be glad when I've seen the back of 'em and I'll be rooting for them both to get beaten severely every time they ever fight again.wesshaw1985 wrote:http://www.BS.com/anthony-dirr ... nt--118032
But isn't that the flip side of boxing.
To cheer for your favourites, and to cheer for anyone to beat guys like Dirrell's, Money weather, Aduckis, Broner, Wilder perhaps
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Hearn: Dirrell Refused To Enter WBSS, So Smith Can't Go Either - http://www.BS.com/hearn-dirrel ... er--118177
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Smith now in the WBSS competition, incredibly so is Jurgen Braehmer, he looked dead at weigh in for 175 not sure how he makes 168.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/bo ... g-13290072
Big decision, looks like Dirrel was going to get his own way and get the fight moved to Flint. Looking at the line-up, he looks to be 2nd faviourate behind Groves. Braehmer will have to cut off a leg to make 168 in any kind of shape. Wonder who the other 3 will be, Degale, Eubank Jr, Chavez Jr, Zeuge??
It needs another 3 decent bigger names....
Big decision, looks like Dirrel was going to get his own way and get the fight moved to Flint. Looking at the line-up, he looks to be 2nd faviourate behind Groves. Braehmer will have to cut off a leg to make 168 in any kind of shape. Wonder who the other 3 will be, Degale, Eubank Jr, Chavez Jr, Zeuge??
It needs another 3 decent bigger names....
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bidsBillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
He's rank 1, he deserves a shotSaadOffTheDeck wrote:No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
well..... he should be the next in line for a shot yes, but he doesn't deserve one, then again its not often someone does these daysOssyrules wrote:He's rank 1, he deserves a shotSaadOffTheDeck wrote:No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
He can have a shot, he'd rather be in the more lucrative tournament.Ossyrules wrote:He's rank 1, he deserves a shotSaadOffTheDeck wrote:No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.BillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
AgreeSaadOffTheDeck wrote:He can have a shot, he'd rather be in the more lucrative tournament.Ossyrules wrote:He's rank 1, he deserves a shotSaadOffTheDeck wrote: No he wasn't, if you want to really get down to hit he hasn't done anything to earn a shot. Now he has a much more lucrative opportunity.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23132
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
His first fight in the tournament is for the diamond belt.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.rio wrote:He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bidsBillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Watch Eddie Hearn and Joe Gallagher claim Callum to be a world champion if he gets this bull5h!t diamond belt.
Anyway looks like David Benevidez is stepping in. Just watch a 20 year old step in and smash Dirrell in Flint now.
Benevidez when he develops will be multiple levels above Callum Smith he already has a better win on his resume.
Anyway looks like David Benevidez is stepping in. Just watch a 20 year old step in and smash Dirrell in Flint now.
Benevidez when he develops will be multiple levels above Callum Smith he already has a better win on his resume.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.Naandrew wrote:They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.rio wrote:He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bidsBillyTKid wrote:Smith been really screwed over with this WBC title shot. Feels like years that he has been mandatory.
You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Let see watched Benevidez v Medina a couple of weeks ago on the PBC website. I'm on the hype train considering his age he looks a very special prospect.Tanzio wrote:If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.Naandrew wrote:They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.rio wrote:
He screwed himself. Dirrell is still fighting for the belt, Smith has pulled out. They didn't want to fight in flint, but if that is the case they should have won the purse bids
You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - September 9th 2017
Naandrew wrote:Let see watched Benevidez v Medina a couple of weeks ago on the PBC website. I'm on the hype train considering his age he looks a very special prospect.Tanzio wrote:If the bold was true then Dirrel v Benavidez is more marketable on that undercard anyway.Naandrew wrote:
They did go to purse bids they ( Dirrels team ) won it. The never officially announced an LA card. It seemed the fight was going to be on the undercard of the Leo Santa Cruz Mares rematch but they haven't reached a deal. ( in fact the WBA just called purse bids for that.
You are bang on apart from that though. Smith has pulled out of the fight with Dirrell because he would NOT fight him in his home town FACT.
-
wesshaw1985
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57
Re: Anthony Dirrell vs. Callum Smith - OFF
Smith Explains Why He Passed on Dirrell Title Bout To Join WBSS - http://www.BS.com/smith-explai ... ss--118272