Boxerbeetle wrote:I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on BoxrecBoxerbeetle wrote:This is a superb argument.HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
john fury
Re: john fury
-
watsupdoc87
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2841
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16
Re: john fury
Couldn't of said it better. 2nd chances everyoneBoxerbeetle wrote:I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on BoxrecBoxerbeetle wrote:This is a superb argument.HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: john fury
Just reading back, because it's my favourite thread, Henry called the US election!Coco wrote:Coco wrote:
Wounded Knee? They all just moved on to the adjoining site
I was referring to Wounded Knee 1971, where the government (for seventy plus days) had a ground war with the Native American.
Whichever one you are talking about I think the link is tenuous even if I was being very kind.
But then you did say on another forum that you feel Trump is appealing to the minorities!
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
Re: john fury
I did indeed, same with Fury-Klitschkomickey1975 wrote: Just reading back, because it's my favourite thread, Henry called the US election!
Re: john fury
Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.Boxerbeetle wrote:I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on BoxrecBoxerbeetle wrote:This is a superb argument.HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
Re: john fury
I stand by every word of it.mickey1975 wrote:Partridge has been very quiet recently.
Re: john fury
It wasn't (on this occasion)Teddy's Toupee wrote:I'm not sure it is PIGG. His/her newly minted pseudonyms usually appear to have only been boxrec members for a few days or even hours. Unless this is a sleeper pseudonym.
Re: john fury
It isn't/wasn't (nice to know I am considered 'notorious', that's a good thing ... right?)magnus wrote:There's been a Peter Barlow posting on Checkhook for ages, with the same viewpoints as this guy. Don't think it's the Notorious PIGG.
Re: john fury
Afraid notBoxerbeetle wrote:Damnit, if it is Pigg then he completely fooled me. Fair play
Re: john fury
I've 'stepped it up' on many occasions (dozens of accounts you've never rumbled) bit this sorry effort is not me:Pugilist-specialist wrote:![]()
After I rumbled him on the other thread it's obvious!
Step it up Pigg!
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: john fury
I just thought I would bump this thread for gigles. I hope it finds a new audience. everyone should rad it.
Re: john fury
Re-reading this after all this time this certainly sounds like the ramblings of a mad man. Perhaps coming back isn't the best thing for him. He should throw his phone and away and go and live in the woods somewhere. He would have been alright in another era, would Tyson. Like 100 years ago. I'm glad he's retired.
Re: john fury
She's some thread for one thread 
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16412
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: john fury
Re: john fury
Anybody posted this to Tysons twitter for the crack?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: john fury
Could have been worse, could have been a squatterbanjo wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 07:02Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.Boxerbeetle wrote:I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on BoxrecBoxerbeetle wrote:
This is a superb argument.
Re: john fury
Mitchell Quy! I could watch documentaries about that delusional scumbucket every hour for the rest of my days.banjo wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 07:02Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.Boxerbeetle wrote:I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on BoxrecBoxerbeetle wrote:
This is a superb argument.
My favourite moment was when he said on camera 'there is only one person who knows what happened between me and my wife, and that's me'.
Er, wouldn't your wife who 'walked out on you' know as well? Oh hang on, you killed her.
The fact that the Police took so long to prosecute him was a fecking travesty, the dozy dolts.
-
Wee Tommy
- Heavyweight

Re: john fury
This says it allHomicideHenry wrote: ↑19 Dec 2015, 18:24bripez wrote:Henry, you need to let it go mate - I am sure life will get more positive and happy if you do rather than dwelling on stuff that might have hapoened hundreds of years ago and spending your time listening to people telling romanticised tales if a bygone era that never was whilst using selective facts.
I'm sure that's what slave owners said to the Africans, before boarding them on the ships too.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23013
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: john fury
Terry's asked me to point out Frank and Big John are mates and the stories nonsense
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39215
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: john fury
I credit the effort though, was a good thread 
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: john fury
Was thinking of this when reading Terrys article on Frank in Boxing News. Frank still sounded a bit highly strung when telling the story of the bouncer.handsofstone wrote: ↑18 Nov 2019, 18:44 Terry's asked me to point out Frank and Big John are mates and the stories nonsense
Re: john fury
I still like to think it's true! Great story
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22949
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54