john fury

chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6860
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: john fury

Post by chinarich »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
This is a superb argument. :yay:
I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
:clap: Henry has missed out if he isn't building a career as a defence lawyer...
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: john fury

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
This is a superb argument. :yay:
I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
Couldn't of said it better. 2nd chances everyone :bag:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22949
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: john fury

Post by mickey1975 »

Coco wrote:Coco wrote:
Wounded Knee? They all just moved on to the adjoining site


I was referring to Wounded Knee 1971, where the government (for seventy plus days) had a ground war with the Native American.



Whichever one you are talking about I think the link is tenuous even if I was being very kind.
But then you did say on another forum that you feel Trump is appealing to the minorities!
Just reading back, because it's my favourite thread, Henry called the US election!
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: john fury

Post by HomicideHenry »

mickey1975 wrote: Just reading back, because it's my favourite thread, Henry called the US election!
I did indeed, same with Fury-Klitschko
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26341
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: john fury

Post by banjo »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
HomicideHenry wrote:I dont think you know much about John Fury, considering the man has lived in his own home for many years. He's been a productive member of society. He's a fairly rich man. He isn't some squatter or all-around law breaker. I mean, outside of the incident where he blinded a man permanently, how often has he been arrested or incarcerated? I don't think he is a bad man.
This is a superb argument. :yay:
I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.
Roche 5
Lightweight
Posts: 48
Joined: 23 Jun 2017, 15:06

Re: john fury

Post by Roche 5 »

mickey1975 wrote:Partridge has been very quiet recently.
I stand by every word of it.

Image
Roche 5
Lightweight
Posts: 48
Joined: 23 Jun 2017, 15:06

Re: john fury

Post by Roche 5 »

Teddy's Toupee wrote:I'm not sure it is PIGG. His/her newly minted pseudonyms usually appear to have only been boxrec members for a few days or even hours. Unless this is a sleeper pseudonym.
It wasn't (on this occasion)

Image
Roche 5
Lightweight
Posts: 48
Joined: 23 Jun 2017, 15:06

Re: john fury

Post by Roche 5 »

magnus wrote:There's been a Peter Barlow posting on Checkhook for ages, with the same viewpoints as this guy. Don't think it's the Notorious PIGG.
It isn't/wasn't (nice to know I am considered 'notorious', that's a good thing ... right?)

Image
Roche 5
Lightweight
Posts: 48
Joined: 23 Jun 2017, 15:06

Re: john fury

Post by Roche 5 »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Damnit, if it is Pigg then he completely fooled me. Fair play :salut:
Afraid not

Image
Roche 5
Lightweight
Posts: 48
Joined: 23 Jun 2017, 15:06

Re: john fury

Post by Roche 5 »

Pugilist-specialist wrote: :lol:
After I rumbled him on the other thread it's obvious!
Step it up Pigg!
I've 'stepped it up' on many occasions (dozens of accounts you've never rumbled) bit this sorry effort is not me:

Image
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: john fury

Post by Counter-puncher »

I just thought I would bump this thread for gigles. I hope it finds a new audience. everyone should rad it.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5737
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: john fury

Post by Cyclops »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing ... eddon.html

Honourable??
Re-reading this after all this time this certainly sounds like the ramblings of a mad man. Perhaps coming back isn't the best thing for him. He should throw his phone and away and go and live in the woods somewhere. He would have been alright in another era, would Tyson. Like 100 years ago. I'm glad he's retired.
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: john fury

Post by SAPFO »

20-18 BUMP !!

😂
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7234
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: john fury

Post by Oiky »

She's some thread for one thread 😂
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16412
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: john fury

Post by Nightmare Roy »

:lol: Id forgot about Henry's Gypsy love :clap:
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2730
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: john fury

Post by SAPFO »

Anybody posted this to Tysons twitter for the crack?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: john fury

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

banjo wrote: 26 Jun 2017, 07:02
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
This is a superb argument. :yay:
I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.
Could have been worse, could have been a squatter
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3154
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: john fury

Post by deadpan »

banjo wrote: 26 Jun 2017, 07:02
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
This is a superb argument. :yay:
I think I'm going to bump this thread at least once a year from now on - Henry's argument above is possibly my favourite thing ever posted on Boxrec
Brilliant isn't it? Mitchell Quy had never been arrested or incarcerated but he still murdered his wife.
Mitchell Quy! I could watch documentaries about that delusional scumbucket every hour for the rest of my days.
My favourite moment was when he said on camera 'there is only one person who knows what happened between me and my wife, and that's me'.

Er, wouldn't your wife who 'walked out on you' know as well? Oh hang on, you killed her.

The fact that the Police took so long to prosecute him was a fecking travesty, the dozy dolts.
Wee Tommy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: john fury

Post by Wee Tommy »

HomicideHenry wrote: 19 Dec 2015, 18:24
bripez wrote:Henry, you need to let it go mate - I am sure life will get more positive and happy if you do rather than dwelling on stuff that might have hapoened hundreds of years ago and spending your time listening to people telling romanticised tales if a bygone era that never was whilst using selective facts.

I'm sure that's what slave owners said to the Africans, before boarding them on the ships too.
This says it all :lol:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23013
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: john fury

Post by handsofstone »

Terry's asked me to point out Frank and Big John are mates and the stories nonsense
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39213
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: john fury

Post by margaret thatcher »

I credit the effort though, was a good thread :lol:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22949
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: john fury

Post by mickey1975 »

handsofstone wrote: 18 Nov 2019, 18:44 Terry's asked me to point out Frank and Big John are mates and the stories nonsense
Was thinking of this when reading Terrys article on Frank in Boxing News. Frank still sounded a bit highly strung when telling the story of the bouncer.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28316
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: john fury

Post by Coco »

I still like to think it's true! Great story
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: john fury

Post by bripez »

Coco wrote: 19 Nov 2019, 08:28 I still like to think it's true! Great story
Same here - top story, I’m a believer !
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22949
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: john fury

Post by mickey1975 »

Coco wrote: 19 Nov 2019, 08:28 I still like to think it's true! Great story
I suspect it actually is. It’s very factually correct, with Celesbanksi’s gym, etc.
Post Reply