PARKER VS FURY NON TITLE BOUT.
Re: PARKER VS FURY NON TITLE BOUT.
Leaving aside the merits of Fury as a challenger (he is the mandatory) the WBO only state that officials have to be appointed from an approved list. If the two parties have agreed to neutral officials in their contract then that is nothing to do with either the Board or the WBO...
Re: PARKER VS FURY NON TITLE BOUT.
I'm actually with you on that post. However boxing history is littered with guys fighting another guy who is the level below...Badhusker wrote:Ossyrules wrote:There is no real argument vs neutral judges. Badhusker is just a massive homerCovfefe wrote:
I'm not really sure what point you think you're making?
If their guidelines call for neutral country judges/officials (which I doubt they do) then having all Americans for WBO title fights in the states is nonsense.
No, just a realist that doesn't rely on pissing and moaning before a fight of a robbery. This is a mismatch that shouldn't matter. Parker is B level and Fury is C at best.
Ward vs paul smith
Joshua vs molina
Mayweather vs Mcgregor
We could go on