Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
-
BAD INTENTIONS
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
We already know what would happen.
If Monroe's rating would be a 70, BJS would be a 74.
We already seen GGG walk down and stop Murray, Macklin, Geale and Lemiux.
BJS is worse than those 4 guys. Clearly worse.
If Monroe's rating would be a 70, BJS would be a 74.
We already seen GGG walk down and stop Murray, Macklin, Geale and Lemiux.
BJS is worse than those 4 guys. Clearly worse.
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
Correct , it was dull as dishwasher .Tony1244 wrote:I watched a round or 2 of Saunders-Monroe. I turned off my device and looked at the blank screen and the blank screen was more interesting.
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
He'd have virtually no chance.
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
Big KO. He's not at the level. Lemiuex should be all over a Saunders fight, it's a virtual guaranteed title.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
Saunders can beat Lemieux.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
NoSaadOffTheDeck wrote:Saunders can beat Lemieux.
-
dagilechia
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
he can beat Lemieux but likely would lost.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
Yes, Lemieux is far from a world beater. Saunders would be his best win by a good bit.boxing_rocks wrote:NoSaadOffTheDeck wrote:Saunders can beat Lemieux.
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
I wouldn't expect Saunders to beat Golovkin, Alvarez, Jacobs, or Charlo.
-
boxing_rocks
- Welterweight
- Posts: 7851
- Joined: 20 May 2016, 13:11
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
Saunders didn't really beat Lee. How can he beat the pressure machine (at least for the first 5 rounds) like Lemieux ? I am not even sure that he could beat Khurt.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yes, Lemieux is far from a world beater. Saunders would be his best win by a good bit.boxing_rocks wrote:NoSaadOffTheDeck wrote:Saunders can beat Lemieux.
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
2% chance, like if he had a fast start and was 3-1 up after 4 then head clash stops fight and it goes to the cards
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
He did beat Lee, Lemieux is not a pressure machine. Khurt is a pressure machine, Lemieux is a guy with some pop and minimal skills. Lee could beat Lemiuex too.boxing_rocks wrote:Saunders didn't really beat Lee. How can he beat the pressure machine (at least for the first 5 rounds) like Lemieux ? I am not even sure that he could beat Khurt.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Yes, Lemieux is far from a world beater. Saunders would be his best win by a good bit.boxing_rocks wrote:
No
-
Best Coast
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
A tedious debacle against an unworthy challenger that GGG cut down like a hot knife through butter.Tanzio wrote:I could not bring myself to watch that pig fight yesterday. From what I have read and heard we have missed nothing.
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
A fair assessment. I watched it. It was nothing to write home about but at least the decision was above reproach.Tanzio wrote:I could not bring myself to watch that pig fight yesterday. From what I have read and heard we have missed nothing.
There was a post fight apology from Saunders' young lad who took the mike to apologize to Monroe "Sorry I kicked you in the nuts". It brings tears to your eyes. Getting kicked in the nuts I mean, not the kid's apology - that didn't even seem sincere
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
No chances against Golovkin. That's why BJS ducking GGG and wants so much money for this fight.
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
I think it needs another five years to marinate ![[icon_wink.gif] ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
Anyway, Saunders will have to face (sooner or later) a dangerous opponent. He had better fight GGG or Canelo ( lose fight and make money).
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
Since the start of 2016, Saunders has had failed negotiations/fights fallen through with the likes of Canelo Alvarez (twice), Gennady Golovkin (twice) Avtandil Khurtsidze, Gabriel Rosado, Chris Eubank Jr. and even David Lemieux recently announced that he is disinterested in facing the WBO champion, due to having bigger fish to fry.ValMar wrote:Anyway, Saunders will have to face (sooner or later) a dangerous opponent. He had better fight GGG or Canelo ( lose fight and make money).
Based on my analysis of the readily-available real-world evidence, none of these situations were caused by Saunders or his team.
Yet people insist on criticising the calibre of opposition that Billy Joe Saunders has faced?
Re: Saunders and his chances again Golovkin ?
I suppose Golovkin will be very proud if he become undisputed MW champion, so, his motivation to face Saunders (ASAP) might be very strong.Enlightened-One wrote:Since the start of 2016, Saunders has had failed negotiations/fights fallen through with the likes of Canelo Alvarez (twice), Gennady Golovkin (twice) Avtandil Khurtsidze, Gabriel Rosado, Chris Eubank Jr. and even David Lemieux recently announced that he is disinterested in facing the WBO champion, due to having bigger fish to fry.ValMar wrote:Anyway, Saunders will have to face (sooner or later) a dangerous opponent. He had better fight GGG or Canelo ( lose fight and make money).
Based on my analysis of the readily-available real-world evidence, none of these situations were caused by Saunders or his team.
Yet people insist on criticising the calibre of opposition that Billy Joe Saunders has faced?