Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 103354
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
The battle between two-time Olympic gold medallists Vasyl Lomachenko and Guillermo Rigondeaux on December 9th at Madison Square Garden will be shown exclusively live on BoxNâtion.
‘The Channel of Champions’ will air the dream matchup featuring two men regarded as boxing’s greatest ever amateurs as part of the channel’s exclusive output deal with promoters Top Rank.
‘The Channel of Champions’ will air the dream matchup featuring two men regarded as boxing’s greatest ever amateurs as part of the channel’s exclusive output deal with promoters Top Rank.
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
Great fight - but Rigo is too small to severely trouble Lomachenko
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
See this being a more technical version of Crawford v Gamboa. Loma too big and will stop Rigo late after a few knockdowns.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32959
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
Going to be extremely interesting to see how Loma deals with Rigo’s style & movement. But agree that the size difference will probably be the deciding factor.
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
Lomas is going to absolutely destroy Rigo and I can't wait for it.
Lomas has too high an output and too smart for Rigo to set the pace against.
I actually fancy Loma to ko him in 3 rounds.
Lomas has too high an output and too smart for Rigo to set the pace against.
I actually fancy Loma to ko him in 3 rounds.
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
Such a shame the fight wasn't made at FW.
Surely Loma will be too big for him.
Also I've never been convinced of Rigos age. Think he used the same passport office as Liston and Ortiz.
Surely Loma will be too big for him.
Also I've never been convinced of Rigos age. Think he used the same passport office as Liston and Ortiz.
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
Rigo is most likely going to get destroyed.
Quigg should have been the man to do Rigo in.
Why was everyone so afraid of Rigo? He's an overrated, inactive, elderly midget.
Quigg should have been the man to do Rigo in.
Why was everyone so afraid of Rigo? He's an overrated, inactive, elderly midget.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32959
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
QuiggHorse wrote:Rigo is most likely going to get destroyed.
Quigg should have been the man to do Rigo in.
Why was everyone so afraid of Rigo? He's an overrated, inactive, elderly midget.
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
Quigg would have lost by a wide wide marginHorse wrote:Rigo is most likely going to get destroyed.
Quigg should have been the man to do Rigo in.
Why was everyone so afraid of Rigo? He's an overrated, inactive, elderly midget.
Imagine him doing what he did against Frampton, against Rigo. With a 6 round advantage going into the second half of a fight, I can think of no better fighting style to retain that lead and/or punish Quigg when he started getting desperate and taking chances.
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
With Gallagher he would have lost clearly, but with a proper trainer he'd deal with the pretentious Rigo.davie wrote:Quigg would have lost by a wide wide margin
Imagine him doing what he did against Frampton, against Rigo. With a 6 round advantage going into the second half of a fight, I can think of no better fighting style to retain that lead and/or punish Quigg when he started getting desperate and taking chances.
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
With Gallagher he would have lost in embarassing fashion.Horse wrote:With Gallagher he would have lost clearly, but with a proper trainer he'd deal with the pretentious Rigo.davie wrote:Quigg would have lost by a wide wide margin
Imagine him doing what he did against Frampton, against Rigo. With a 6 round advantage going into the second half of a fight, I can think of no better fighting style to retain that lead and/or punish Quigg when he started getting desperate and taking chances.
With a good trainer he would perhaps fair better and still lose, in my opinion.
Rigo is a far better boxer, possibly a level above
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
Maybe, but I think Rigo is hugely overrated and that Quigg is significantly underrated, so maybe I'm a bit biased here.davie wrote:With Gallagher he would have lost in embarassing fashion.
With a good trainer he would perhaps fair better and still lose, in my opinion.
Rigo is a far better boxer, possibly a level above
Rigo has done so little since beating Donaire 4.5 years ago, that he may well be washed up and no one's noticed, because he fights such low level opposition.
If I promoted Quigg, I'd have definitely been looking to have him fight Rigo before the move up to featherweight.
Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion
You may have a point with Rigo, we won't know until he is tested.Horse wrote:Maybe, but I think Rigo is hugely overrated and that Quigg is significantly underrated, so maybe I'm a bit biased here.davie wrote:With Gallagher he would have lost in embarassing fashion.
With a good trainer he would perhaps fair better and still lose, in my opinion.
Rigo is a far better boxer, possibly a level above
Rigo has done so little since beating Donaire 4.5 years ago, that he may well be washed up and no one's noticed, because he fights such low level opposition.
If I promoted Quigg, I'd have definitely been looking to have him fight Rigo before the move up to featherweight.
But we can confidently say he WAS a better boxer than Quigg.
Whether we agree on the outcome or not, we can agree it is a fight that we'd like to see. I think if Quigg approached it in the right way, it could be an interesting blend of styles
You never know, it might yet happen at 126lb