Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post Reply
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103355
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

The battle between two-time Olympic gold medallists Vasyl Lomachenko and Guillermo Rigondeaux on December 9th at Madison Square Garden will be shown exclusively live on BoxNâtion.

‘The Channel of Champions’ will air the dream matchup featuring two men regarded as boxing’s greatest ever amateurs as part of the channel’s exclusive output deal with promoters Top Rank.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by davie »

:TU:
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Spud »

Great fight - but Rigo is too small to severely trouble Lomachenko
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Stuarty »

See this being a more technical version of Crawford v Gamboa. Loma too big and will stop Rigo late after a few knockdowns.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32959
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Going to be extremely interesting to see how Loma deals with Rigo’s style & movement. But agree that the size difference will probably be the deciding factor.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Andrew »

Lomas is going to absolutely destroy Rigo and I can't wait for it.

Lomas has too high an output and too smart for Rigo to set the pace against.

I actually fancy Loma to ko him in 3 rounds.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by PredatorHayds »

Such a shame the fight wasn't made at FW.
Surely Loma will be too big for him.

Also I've never been convinced of Rigos age. Think he used the same passport office as Liston and Ortiz.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Horse »

Rigo is most likely going to get destroyed.

Quigg should have been the man to do Rigo in.

Why was everyone so afraid of Rigo? He's an overrated, inactive, elderly midget.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32959
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Horse wrote:Rigo is most likely going to get destroyed.

Quigg should have been the man to do Rigo in.

Why was everyone so afraid of Rigo? He's an overrated, inactive, elderly midget.
Quigg :lol:
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by davie »

Horse wrote:Rigo is most likely going to get destroyed.

Quigg should have been the man to do Rigo in.

Why was everyone so afraid of Rigo? He's an overrated, inactive, elderly midget.
Quigg would have lost by a wide wide margin

Imagine him doing what he did against Frampton, against Rigo. With a 6 round advantage going into the second half of a fight, I can think of no better fighting style to retain that lead and/or punish Quigg when he started getting desperate and taking chances.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Horse »

davie wrote:Quigg would have lost by a wide wide margin

Imagine him doing what he did against Frampton, against Rigo. With a 6 round advantage going into the second half of a fight, I can think of no better fighting style to retain that lead and/or punish Quigg when he started getting desperate and taking chances.
With Gallagher he would have lost clearly, but with a proper trainer he'd deal with the pretentious Rigo.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by davie »

Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Quigg would have lost by a wide wide margin

Imagine him doing what he did against Frampton, against Rigo. With a 6 round advantage going into the second half of a fight, I can think of no better fighting style to retain that lead and/or punish Quigg when he started getting desperate and taking chances.
With Gallagher he would have lost clearly, but with a proper trainer he'd deal with the pretentious Rigo.
With Gallagher he would have lost in embarassing fashion.
With a good trainer he would perhaps fair better and still lose, in my opinion.
Rigo is a far better boxer, possibly a level above
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by Horse »

davie wrote:With Gallagher he would have lost in embarassing fashion.
With a good trainer he would perhaps fair better and still lose, in my opinion.
Rigo is a far better boxer, possibly a level above
Maybe, but I think Rigo is hugely overrated and that Quigg is significantly underrated, so maybe I'm a bit biased here.

Rigo has done so little since beating Donaire 4.5 years ago, that he may well be washed up and no one's noticed, because he fights such low level opposition.

If I promoted Quigg, I'd have definitely been looking to have him fight Rigo before the move up to featherweight.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux Lands on BoxNâtion

Post by davie »

Horse wrote:
davie wrote:With Gallagher he would have lost in embarassing fashion.
With a good trainer he would perhaps fair better and still lose, in my opinion.
Rigo is a far better boxer, possibly a level above
Maybe, but I think Rigo is hugely overrated and that Quigg is significantly underrated, so maybe I'm a bit biased here.

Rigo has done so little since beating Donaire 4.5 years ago, that he may well be washed up and no one's noticed, because he fights such low level opposition.

If I promoted Quigg, I'd have definitely been looking to have him fight Rigo before the move up to featherweight.
You may have a point with Rigo, we won't know until he is tested.
But we can confidently say he WAS a better boxer than Quigg.

Whether we agree on the outcome or not, we can agree it is a fight that we'd like to see. I think if Quigg approached it in the right way, it could be an interesting blend of styles

You never know, it might yet happen at 126lb
Post Reply