So who do you all rate below Calzaghe?
All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.
Someone asked for someone to do it. :P
So who do you all rate below Calzaghe?
So who do you all rate below Calzaghe?
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
pundit
- Heavyweight

Re: All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.
Below Calzaghe? Lacy, Tocker Pudwill, Reggie Strickland - otherwise not many.Max Molyneux wrote:Someone asked for someone to do it. :P
So who do you all rate below Calzaghe?
Re: All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.
Where's Lima to defend Reggie Strickland and his World Title aspirations that were routinely ripped from his grasp by the evil judging of the midwest....oh that's right, he's in jail.pundit wrote:Below Calzaghe? Lacy, Tocker Pudwill, Reggie Strickland - otherwise not many.Max Molyneux wrote:Someone asked for someone to do it. :P
So who do you all rate below Calzaghe?![]()
![]()
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Re: All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.
Who do you rate past the master then?pundit wrote:Below Calzaghe? Lacy, Tocker Pudwill, Reggie Strickland - otherwise not many.Max Molyneux wrote:Someone asked for someone to do it. :P
So who do you all rate below Calzaghe?![]()
![]()
-
pundit
- Heavyweight

Re: All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.
Past the "master"? You mean Sven Ottke?Max Molyneux wrote:Who do you rate past the master then?pundit wrote:Below Calzaghe? Lacy, Tocker Pudwill, Reggie Strickland - otherwise not many.Max Molyneux wrote:Someone asked for someone to do it. :P
So who do you all rate below Calzaghe?![]()
![]()
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
pundit
- Heavyweight

I guess you refer to:Max Molyneux wrote:All I did was make a Super Middleweight thread like someone asked though.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
topper123
Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 1691
Location: down south
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:14 pm Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For f*cks sake, don't someone start a Euro Supermiddle top ten thread .
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Calzaghe beat Eubank though prime or not.garye wrote:Benn, Jones, Calzaghe, Toney, Eubank.
On a head-to-head basis, Eubank would be top.
Toney could of been out of shape sometimes so you never know with either.
Good as Benn was Calzaghe would outbox him.
Tough close fight with Jones in my opinion and only my opinion.
I can't possibly agree with that. Jones was the best of them all, but he didn't spend much time at supermiddle. Toney is a legend, and he would have beaten Benn and Eubank, the guys who were there when he called them out.garye wrote:Benn, Jones, Calzaghe, Toney, Eubank.
On a head-to-head basis, Eubank would be top.
Both Benn and Eubank thought Calzaghe was better than them, or so the story goes.
To rank them, I'd say:
Jones
Toney
Calzaghe
Eubank
Benn
If they all fought.... I think Jones would beat them all, with Toney and Calzaghe being not that far behind. If it was straight-out brutality, Benn has it. Eubank trails in my view, but only because he's in a very good line. Chris would beat Lucas and Kessler, if you ask me.
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
-
Max Molyneux
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 7084
- Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53
Didn't Collins retire as soon as Joe became his mandatory? Was a head injury I read though. He beat Eubank too and his defence record.
Jones wasn't at Supermiddle long enough either and the best he fought only was Toney there. Plus it is said he took the path of least resistance too like they said with Joe.
Jones wasn't at Supermiddle long enough either and the best he fought only was Toney there. Plus it is said he took the path of least resistance too like they said with Joe.
RJJ stays at 168 he never loses a fight in his career, even now.tonyevs wrote:There really is no doubt...RJJ every tim...he didn`t stay too long cos there weren`t much to clear up...much like SRR at welter...best remembered at middle but his best weight was welter...imagine holyfield staying at cruiser...Mattyp151 wrote:At 168...not Roy Jones....muahaha
1. Joe Calzaghe
2. Eubank
3. Collins
4. Benn
I will not rate Roy at 168 because he did too little at this weight to count, but h2h Roy would have been tough for Joe. As Joe would have been tough for Roy. It would have been the meeting of the two potentially greatest SMW's in history. Eubank was exciting and unorthodox, but I believe Joe would have tamed Eubank (prime for prime) and have beaten him mercilessly. Roy is kind of a faster version of Eubank (and one of my all time favorites) so I think his speed could trouble Joe more, but Joe is fast himself so this is the best fight that could ever have been made in SMW boxing.
2. Eubank
3. Collins
4. Benn
I will not rate Roy at 168 because he did too little at this weight to count, but h2h Roy would have been tough for Joe. As Joe would have been tough for Roy. It would have been the meeting of the two potentially greatest SMW's in history. Eubank was exciting and unorthodox, but I believe Joe would have tamed Eubank (prime for prime) and have beaten him mercilessly. Roy is kind of a faster version of Eubank (and one of my all time favorites) so I think his speed could trouble Joe more, but Joe is fast himself so this is the best fight that could ever have been made in SMW boxing.
-
BubiScholz
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1879
- Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02
Roy is #1 on pure talent, Calzaghe is #1 on achievement. If Calzaghe would beat Beyer and Kessler that would easily make him #1, and also would show that being a career super middle he'd deserve more consideration. Roy definitely copuldn't have made super middle forever - he was a frigging 180-lb middle with massive biceps! Ottke can't be too far behind, Eubank I hold back for suspect passionless wins, Collins should be ranked high
Wouldn't it have been great if Collins had fought Calzaghe in '97?
Wouldn't it have been great if Collins had fought Calzaghe in '97?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45231
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
What Eubank would have beaten Jones Jr and Toney? Are you saying that Benn was the best of the lot or does his name just happen to come first?garye wrote:Benn, Jones, Calzaghe, Toney, Eubank.
On a head-to-head basis, Eubank would be top.
Benn was a fierce competitor, but vulnerable and even at his best had a porous defence. He was very lucky that the ref was so incompetent for the McClellan fight otherwise he would have been stopped in the 1st. I know it's sacriledge to say that, but it's a fact.
Eubank had some close calls against sub par fighters and was terribly lazy on occasion, I wonder how well even a prime Eubank would have coped with Joe's speed and workrate.
Jones Junior would have boxed to a comfortable win over Joe, too fast, too much movement and enough power to keep Joe from trying to swarm him.
Toney, interesting one, Toney usually struggled against counterpunchers and movers, but think Joe would make it difficult, but still favour Toney.
If we are talking about the best fighter at 168, then it's Jones Jr, but if we are talking about the best champ, then I think it has to be Calzaghe.