All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.

Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.

Post by Max Molyneux »

Someone asked for someone to do it. :P

So who do you all rate below Calzaghe? :TU:
mattyp151
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 10:51

Post by mattyp151 »

At 168...not Roy Jones....muahaha :TU:
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Roy wasn't there long enough and Toney was his best opp there. :TU:

I'd rate that fatass below Joe though.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.

Post by pundit »

Max Molyneux wrote:Someone asked for someone to do it. :P

So who do you all rate below Calzaghe? :TU:
Below Calzaghe? Lacy, Tocker Pudwill, Reggie Strickland - otherwise not many. :lol: :lol: :lol:
mattyp151
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 10:51

Re: All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.

Post by mattyp151 »

pundit wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:Someone asked for someone to do it. :P

So who do you all rate below Calzaghe? :TU:
Below Calzaghe? Lacy, Tocker Pudwill, Reggie Strickland - otherwise not many. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Where's Lima to defend Reggie Strickland and his World Title aspirations that were routinely ripped from his grasp by the evil judging of the midwest....oh that's right, he's in jail.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Re: All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.

Post by Max Molyneux »

pundit wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:Someone asked for someone to do it. :P

So who do you all rate below Calzaghe? :TU:
Below Calzaghe? Lacy, Tocker Pudwill, Reggie Strickland - otherwise not many. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Who do you rate past the master then?
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: All time top 10 Super Middleweight thread.

Post by pundit »

Max Molyneux wrote:
pundit wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:Someone asked for someone to do it. :P

So who do you all rate below Calzaghe? :TU:
Below Calzaghe? Lacy, Tocker Pudwill, Reggie Strickland - otherwise not many. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Who do you rate past the master then?
Past the "master"? You mean Sven Ottke? :lol:
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

No he was the deceptor who fooled people into thinking he was.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

Oh, for fucks sake.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

All I did was make a Super Middleweight thread like someone asked though.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Max Molyneux wrote:All I did was make a Super Middleweight thread like someone asked though.
I guess you refer to:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

topper123



Joined: 13 Jul 2004
Posts: 1691
Location: down south
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:14 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For f*cks sake, don't someone start a Euro Supermiddle top ten thread .
garye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9
Joined: 13 Mar 2006, 09:03

Post by garye »

Benn, Jones, Calzaghe, Toney, Eubank.

On a head-to-head basis, Eubank would be top.
Last edited by garye on 05 Apr 2006, 18:25, edited 1 time in total.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

I misread! :lol:

Ah well If I had seen enough Supermiddles I'd make a full list but I've only seen a few.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

garye wrote:Benn, Jones, Calzaghe, Toney, Eubank.

On a head-to-head basis, Eubank would be top.
Calzaghe beat Eubank though prime or not.

Toney could of been out of shape sometimes so you never know with either.

Good as Benn was Calzaghe would outbox him.

Tough close fight with Jones in my opinion and only my opinion.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

garye wrote:Benn, Jones, Calzaghe, Toney, Eubank.

On a head-to-head basis, Eubank would be top.
I can't possibly agree with that. Jones was the best of them all, but he didn't spend much time at supermiddle. Toney is a legend, and he would have beaten Benn and Eubank, the guys who were there when he called them out.

Both Benn and Eubank thought Calzaghe was better than them, or so the story goes.

To rank them, I'd say:
Jones
Toney
Calzaghe
Eubank
Benn

If they all fought.... I think Jones would beat them all, with Toney and Calzaghe being not that far behind. If it was straight-out brutality, Benn has it. Eubank trails in my view, but only because he's in a very good line. Chris would beat Lucas and Kessler, if you ask me.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Who did Toney beat there other than Barkley though who Benn Ko'ed in 1?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27494
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Hello... Steve Collins, remember him? I'd probably rank them like this.

1) Jones
2) Collins
3) Eubank
4) Joe
5) Benn (as a Super Middleweight)
6) Toney (not there long enough)
7) Ottke
8) Nunn
9) Beyer
10) Watson.

As a rough guide.
fist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 520
Joined: 01 May 2003, 06:04

Post by fist »

In my opinion Benn was the man, so vicious, a true warrior who could scrap as good as anyone. To be honest, I cannot really seperate Watson / Eubank / Calzaghe. All class.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Didn't Collins retire as soon as Joe became his mandatory? Was a head injury I read though. He beat Eubank too and his defence record.

Jones wasn't at Supermiddle long enough either and the best he fought only was Toney there. Plus it is said he took the path of least resistance too like they said with Joe. :-?
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Post by tonyevs »

Mattyp151 wrote:At 168...not Roy Jones....muahaha :TU:
There really is no doubt...RJJ every tim...he didn`t stay too long cos there weren`t much to clear up...much like SRR at welter...best remembered at middle but his best weight was welter...imagine holyfield staying at cruiser...
mattyp151
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 10:51

Post by mattyp151 »

tonyevs wrote:
Mattyp151 wrote:At 168...not Roy Jones....muahaha :TU:
There really is no doubt...RJJ every tim...he didn`t stay too long cos there weren`t much to clear up...much like SRR at welter...best remembered at middle but his best weight was welter...imagine holyfield staying at cruiser...
RJJ stays at 168 he never loses a fight in his career, even now.
Deram
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 168
Joined: 25 Sep 2005, 22:55

Post by Deram »

1. Joe Calzaghe
2. Eubank
3. Collins
4. Benn

I will not rate Roy at 168 because he did too little at this weight to count, but h2h Roy would have been tough for Joe. As Joe would have been tough for Roy. It would have been the meeting of the two potentially greatest SMW's in history. Eubank was exciting and unorthodox, but I believe Joe would have tamed Eubank (prime for prime) and have beaten him mercilessly. Roy is kind of a faster version of Eubank (and one of my all time favorites) so I think his speed could trouble Joe more, but Joe is fast himself so this is the best fight that could ever have been made in SMW boxing.
BubiScholz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1879
Joined: 02 Feb 2004, 13:02

Post by BubiScholz »

this is not a thread "Who is the best british SMW?".

Joe and Sven are factwise the 2 best with long distance. Sven would have done the same with Toney as he did with Johnson BTW......."Lass ihn kommen und dann lauf weg, Junge. Der wird müde."
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Roy is #1 on pure talent, Calzaghe is #1 on achievement. If Calzaghe would beat Beyer and Kessler that would easily make him #1, and also would show that being a career super middle he'd deserve more consideration. Roy definitely copuldn't have made super middle forever - he was a frigging 180-lb middle with massive biceps! Ottke can't be too far behind, Eubank I hold back for suspect passionless wins, Collins should be ranked high

Wouldn't it have been great if Collins had fought Calzaghe in '97?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

garye wrote:Benn, Jones, Calzaghe, Toney, Eubank.

On a head-to-head basis, Eubank would be top.
What Eubank would have beaten Jones Jr and Toney? Are you saying that Benn was the best of the lot or does his name just happen to come first?

Benn was a fierce competitor, but vulnerable and even at his best had a porous defence. He was very lucky that the ref was so incompetent for the McClellan fight otherwise he would have been stopped in the 1st. I know it's sacriledge to say that, but it's a fact.

Eubank had some close calls against sub par fighters and was terribly lazy on occasion, I wonder how well even a prime Eubank would have coped with Joe's speed and workrate.

Jones Junior would have boxed to a comfortable win over Joe, too fast, too much movement and enough power to keep Joe from trying to swarm him.

Toney, interesting one, Toney usually struggled against counterpunchers and movers, but think Joe would make it difficult, but still favour Toney.

If we are talking about the best fighter at 168, then it's Jones Jr, but if we are talking about the best champ, then I think it has to be Calzaghe.
Post Reply