Round-By-Round - George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Groves vs. Cox Winner?

Poll ended at 10 Jul 2017, 02:35

George Groves
92
88%
Jamie Cox
12
12%
 
Total votes: 104

KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26491
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by KiwiRider »

mfc_se15 wrote:
KiwiRider wrote:It's getting close.
Eubank is already spouting off after his big win on the weekend.
Pressure is on George to make a big showing here.
This was my pick of the first round of the WBSS for entertainment factor.
On the flip side Cox is being so overlooked he can't be in need of anything else to fire him up for this one and invoke a bit of underdog spirit. I've seen nothing of Cox to suggest he can win however but you'd think he won't be lacking in the motivation for this one, massive name, belt on the, everyone writing you off and (I'd assume) an even bigger pay day after this one.

Just hope whoever does it, doesn't pick up an injury. The fight with Eubank takes place in January so I've read not a massive amount of time if it was a significant injury.
Oh, I think Jamie is going to bring it. His 0 is on the line too. His last fight showed improvement in defence. Unfortunately a lot of it was displayed out of range. If he further improves that, Groves isn't in for an easy a night as some predict. The one reoccurring critisism of Cox is that he is easy to hit. I've seen less of that lately.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by handsofstone »

I used to really rate Cox, seems like a lifetime ago he was Commonwealth champ down at 154, I remember the fight with Sai where he really should've been DQ'd, he never really recovered from that fight, inactive ,problems outside the ring etc he's come back at 168, still looks strong, aggressive and throws shots with mean intentions, seems like his temprement is still an issue, the fight with Rios last year was an absolute shambles and Cox allowed himself to be dragged down to an inferior opponents level

Groves on the other hand is about as mentally strong as you can get IMO, has major self belief and becoming world champ will have surely got rid of any demons he had after his failed title attempts, he was excellent against Chudinov, gambled by throwing the kitchen sink and it paid off, I think a fully firing Cox makes this a close fight but Groves temprement, experience and natural size wins this for me, I doubt he can stop Cox and I reckon Jamie will make a good fist of it but Groves championship experience will see him a deserved winner me thinks
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6630
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by THEBUTCH »

Groves has been there and done it. Cox has the all the questions marks against him (at this level).

George mustn't underestimate Cox and if he doesn't, then I fancy a stoppage win for Grove. Jamie won't have felt power like what Grove can generate in that right hand.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16417
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by Nightmare Roy »

boxingknockout wrote:
TheCobra wrote:Groves, a level above Cox who hasn't shown anything in a real fight to make me think he's anything more than a British level bully. All this gym whipsers rubbish means nothing on fight night.
What are the gym rumours?

Did Cox knock out Joshua in sparring as well????! :lol: :o
Who hasn't?
ILikeBeer
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 10939
Joined: 25 Dec 2004, 07:23

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by ILikeBeer »

THEBUTCH wrote:Groves has been there and done it. Cox has the all the questions marks against him (at this level).

George mustn't underestimate Cox and if he doesn't, then I fancy a stoppage win for Grove. Jamie won't have felt power like what Grove can generate in that right hand.
THE BUTCH! :salut:
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5148
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by TheLeprechaun »

You can tell groves isnt taking cox seriously.

He probably expects to have cox out of there early
TheGingerBomber
Lightweight
Posts: 1233
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 13:18

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by TheGingerBomber »

Anyone hear Eddie Hearn on Groves vs Cox?
Said Cox is the first puncher Groves has been in with since Froch ffs...
Cox, who couldn't finish an English level middleweight, has more power than the man who destroyed Cleverly and very nearly took James Degale out. Also dropped Groves.
He didn't just forget Jack either, he actually stated Jack was a non-puncher.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by leejonesjnr »

It's an interesting fight.
Like most people I'm expecting George Groves to win reasonably handily but that said, based on his career at 168 so far we really have no idea how good Jamie Cox is.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46265
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by gilgamesh »

Sparring stories mean nothing.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13363
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by jameswilson »

gilgamesh wrote:
Sparring stories mean nothing.
Cox has long been known as a sparring legend. He hasn't ever been known as a ring legend.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by jamamb »

lets say its true and he did ko jack. does it mean much when in actaul fight cant even drop an english level opponent moving up? only 13 ko in 24 wins at low level.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26491
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by KiwiRider »

Who cuts Jamie's hair?
My mum used to inflict that on me in the 70's with home haircuts and "the mixing bowl" :doh:
Is it now 'a thing' to look like Forrest Gump?
I hope it doesn't catch on down here, I'll probably get the bash sniggering at numpties walking around with bowl haircuts.
Lightsoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 889
Joined: 13 Feb 2006, 07:11

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by Lightsoot »

Can't believe so many are writing Cox off. Has a great chance early. Since when did Groves have a good chin and was blowing hard vs Chudinov. Cox to blitz him inside three rounds.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by Deserter »

Lightsoot wrote:Can't believe so many are writing Cox off. Has a great chance early. Since when did Groves have a good chin and was blowing hard vs Chudinov. Cox to blitz him inside three rounds.
Behave Ben... what has Cox done to remotely suggest he belongs in this class? Me thinks you are just trolling...
Lightsoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 889
Joined: 13 Feb 2006, 07:11

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by Lightsoot »

Deserter wrote:
Lightsoot wrote:Can't believe so many are writing Cox off. Has a great chance early. Since when did Groves have a good chin and was blowing hard vs Chudinov. Cox to blitz him inside three rounds.
Behave Ben... what has Cox done to remotely suggest he belongs in this class? Me thinks you are just trolling...
The same as Groves had done prior to entertaining Froch, Jason. F*** all. But you're writing him off on that basis? Why? Because Groves is exceptionally good or because Cox has flattered to deceive?

Groves suddenly doesn't become a different proposition as a bent holder, and the argument that Cox is a light-middle is stale. Chudinov's workfare gave Groves fits, he literally poured everything into it to get the win and well done George, but it was hard for him which many forget.

Cox has serious unfulfilled talent, will come out fast and relentless and I think he cracks hard enough to hurt Groves. Kenny Anderson was no banger, yet Groves was buzzed. Cox is a southpaw, has excellent punch variety, and over 4 rounds has a great chance.

It beyond 6, then Groves because I think Cox lacks discipline and will punch himself out. But don't discount him.
Lightsoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 889
Joined: 13 Feb 2006, 07:11

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by Lightsoot »

Lightsoot wrote:
Deserter wrote:
Lightsoot wrote:Can't believe so many are writing Cox off. Has a great chance early. Since when did Groves have a good chin and was blowing hard vs Chudinov. Cox to blitz him inside three rounds.
Behave Ben... what has Cox done to remotely suggest he belongs in this class? Me thinks you are just trolling...
The same as Groves had done prior to entertaining Froch, Jason. F*** all. But you're writing him off on that basis? Why? Because Groves is exceptionally good or because Cox has flattered to deceive?

Groves suddenly doesn't become a different proposition as a bent holder, and the argument that Cox is a light-middle is stale. Chudinov's workfare gave Groves fits, he literally poured everything into it to get the win and well done George, but it was hard for him which many forget.

Cox has serious unfulfilled talent, will come out fast and relentless and I think he cracks hard enough to hurt Groves. Kenny Anderson was no banger, yet Groves was buzzed. Cox is a southpaw, has excellent punch variety, and over 4 rounds has a great chance.

It beyond 6, then Groves because I think Cox lacks discipline and will punch himself out. But don't discount him.
Sorry meant belt holder, not bent holder. F'ing predictive text. Ps I'm a big Groves fan.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by leejonesjnr »

Lightsoot wrote:
Lightsoot wrote:
Deserter wrote: Behave Ben... what has Cox done to remotely suggest he belongs in this class? Me thinks you are just trolling...
The same as Groves had done prior to entertaining Froch, Jason. F*** all. But you're writing him off on that basis? Why? Because Groves is exceptionally good or because Cox has flattered to deceive?

Groves suddenly doesn't become a different proposition as a bent holder, and the argument that Cox is a light-middle is stale. Chudinov's workfare gave Groves fits, he literally poured everything into it to get the win and well done George, but it was hard for him which many forget.

Cox has serious unfulfilled talent, will come out fast and relentless and I think he cracks hard enough to hurt Groves. Kenny Anderson was no banger, yet Groves was buzzed. Cox is a southpaw, has excellent punch variety, and over 4 rounds has a great chance.

It beyond 6, then Groves because I think Cox lacks discipline and will punch himself out. But don't discount him.
Sorry meant belt holder, not bent holder. F'ing predictive text. Ps I'm a big Groves fan.
Boxers regularly take a big progressive step forward when they become a champion.
Lightsoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 889
Joined: 13 Feb 2006, 07:11

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by Lightsoot »

leejonesjnr wrote:
Lightsoot wrote:
Lightsoot wrote:
The same as Groves had done prior to entertaining Froch, Jason. F*** all. But you're writing him off on that basis? Why? Because Groves is exceptionally good or because Cox has flattered to deceive?

Groves suddenly doesn't become a different proposition as a bent holder, and the argument that Cox is a light-middle is stale. Chudinov's workfare gave Groves fits, he literally poured everything into it to get the win and well done George, but it was hard for him which many forget.

Cox has serious unfulfilled talent, will come out fast and relentless and I think he cracks hard enough to hurt Groves. Kenny Anderson was no banger, yet Groves was buzzed. Cox is a southpaw, has excellent punch variety, and over 4 rounds has a great chance.

It beyond 6, then Groves because I think Cox lacks discipline and will punch himself out. But don't discount him.
Sorry meant belt holder, not bent holder. F'ing predictive text. Ps I'm a big Groves fan.
Boxers regularly take a big progressive step forward when they become a champion.
A cliche. Examples?
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by leejonesjnr »

Lightsoot wrote:
leejonesjnr wrote:
Lightsoot wrote:
Sorry meant belt holder, not bent holder. F'ing predictive text. Ps I'm a big Groves fan.
Boxers regularly take a big progressive step forward when they become a champion.
A cliche. Examples?
Badou Jack seems a relevant example
Last edited by leejonesjnr on 13 Oct 2017, 19:13, edited 1 time in total.
Lightsoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 889
Joined: 13 Feb 2006, 07:11

Re: George Groves (c) vs. Jamie Cox - October 14th 2017

Post by Lightsoot »

leejonesjnr wrote:
Lightsoot wrote:
leejonesjnr wrote:
Boxers regularly take a big progressive step forward when they become a champion.
A cliche. Examples?
Badly Jack seems a relevant example
Great shout, agreed on Jack. Not sure Groves will emulate but lets see.
Post Reply