AJ vs PULEV off ?

SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Tony1244 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:

Shh. I don't you to get in trouble. Wilder has a Kim Jong like grip on us here in the US. You might get 15 years hard labor.
I voted for Ted Cruz, I'm good.

I voted for Trump and Hillary but didn't do it illegally.
You're in trouble. I'll talk to Ted for you.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24693
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by Tony1244 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: I voted for Ted Cruz, I'm good.

I voted for Trump and Hillary but didn't do it illegally.
You're in trouble. I'll talk to Ted for you.

One was primary, one in the general in case you cared. But please have a ted talk, hopefully Ted & Deontay can expunge all my sins.
Enlightened-One
Super Lightweight
Posts: 14618
Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by Enlightened-One »

Anthony Joshua vs. Carlos Takam (IBF number 3) :TU:
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26529
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by KiwiRider »

Takem has the movement and experience to survive at least 3 rounds. His chin is above average as are his skills. I don't think is will be a Martin type blow out. At least I hope it isn't :maybe:
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by Best Coast »

dagilechia wrote:Takam would be a good opponent, at least it is not someone like shot Arreola
Beg to differ. Arreola is a "has-been"...Takam is a "never-was". :lol:
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by Best Coast »

KiwiRider wrote:Takem has the movement and experience to survive at least 3 rounds. His chin is above average as are his skills. I don't think is will be a Martin type blow out. At least I hope it isn't :maybe:
Good comparison. Not much difference between a 3rd-tier fighter like Takam and a 4th-tier fighter like Martin. :brick:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46471
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by gilgamesh »

Best Coast wrote:
dagilechia wrote:Takam would be a good opponent, at least it is not someone like shot Arreola
Beg to differ. Arreola is a "has-been"...Takam is a "never-was". :lol:
Arreola achieved nothing more than Takam has. If they fought now Takam would beat him comfortably. Not sure if he wouldn't always have beaten him.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by Badhusker »

Why not Ortiz? Wilder is a chicken shit for not fighting Ortiz even though he tested dirty....and Wilder said he would fight him anyway. Crap fight.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46471
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by gilgamesh »

Badhusker wrote:Why not Ortiz? Wilder is a chicken poo for not fighting Ortiz even though he tested dirty....and Wilder said he would fight him anyway. Crap fight.
Wilder said he'd fight him anyway, but he's not going to is he? So he's a liar too is what you're saying?

Not that anybody should expect him to fight a guy that just tested positive, but it's a ridiculous defense on your part, and doesn't take away from the fact that he hasn't fought ONE Top 10 ranked opponent in over 2 and a half years as "Champion"

Meanwhile Joshua just found one on 2 weeks notice to replace the one he was already gonna fight.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by Badhusker »

gilgamesh wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Why not Ortiz? Wilder is a chicken poo for not fighting Ortiz even though he tested dirty....and Wilder said he would fight him anyway. Crap fight.
Wilder said he'd fight him anyway, but he's not going to is he? So he's a liar too is what you're saying?

Not that anybody should expect him to fight a guy that just tested positive, but it's a ridiculous defense on your part, and doesn't take away from the fact that he hasn't fought ONE Top 10 ranked opponent in over 2 and a half years as "Champion"

Meanwhile Joshua just found one on 2 weeks notice to replace the one he was already gonna fight.

Just pointing out the hypocrisy on this forum, the Wilder haters vs the Joshua nuthuggers. Wilder controls Haymon, WADA, VADA, WBC, :roll: etc.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Badhusker wrote:Why not Ortiz? Wilder is a chicken poo for not fighting Ortiz even though he tested dirty....and Wilder said he would fight him anyway. Crap fight.
Because he's satisfying his mandatory. It's one thing to make fun of all the irrational Wilder haters, I do it too. Though I have all of them but Gil on ignore. Acting the same way towards Joshua doesn't accomplish anything but make you look as bad as they do.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Badhusker wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Why not Ortiz? Wilder is a chicken poo for not fighting Ortiz even though he tested dirty....and Wilder said he would fight him anyway. Crap fight.
Wilder said he'd fight him anyway, but he's not going to is he? So he's a liar too is what you're saying?

Not that anybody should expect him to fight a guy that just tested positive, but it's a ridiculous defense on your part, and doesn't take away from the fact that he hasn't fought ONE Top 10 ranked opponent in over 2 and a half years as "Champion"

Meanwhile Joshua just found one on 2 weeks notice to replace the one he was already gonna fight.

Just pointing out the hypocrisy on this forum, the Wilder haters vs the Joshua nuthuggers. Wilder controls Haymon, WADA, VADA, WBC, :roll: etc.

Oops, I thought you were serious. Carry on. :lol:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46471
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by gilgamesh »

Badhusker wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Why not Ortiz? Wilder is a chicken poo for not fighting Ortiz even though he tested dirty....and Wilder said he would fight him anyway. Crap fight.
Wilder said he'd fight him anyway, but he's not going to is he? So he's a liar too is what you're saying?

Not that anybody should expect him to fight a guy that just tested positive, but it's a ridiculous defense on your part, and doesn't take away from the fact that he hasn't fought ONE Top 10 ranked opponent in over 2 and a half years as "Champion"

Meanwhile Joshua just found one on 2 weeks notice to replace the one he was already gonna fight.

Just pointing out the hypocrisy on this forum, the Wilder haters vs the Joshua nuthuggers. Wilder controls Haymon, WADA, VADA, WBC, :roll: etc.
I am not one of the people saying Wilder controls Haymon, WADA, VADA or the WBC. I simply point out that he hasn't defended against a single Top 10 opponent in nearly 3 years as Champion, and since his next opponent is Bermane Stiverne for the 2nd time, and Stiverne is no longer Top 10 this time it'll soon be 3 years.

Stiverne was Top 10 the first time they fought when Wilder won the title from him. This time he ain't ranked at all because he's been inactive for almost 2 years.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by dagilechia »

gilgamesh wrote:
Best Coast wrote:
dagilechia wrote:Takam would be a good opponent, at least it is not someone like shot Arreola
Beg to differ. Arreola is a "has-been"...Takam is a "never-was". :lol:
Arreola achieved nothing more than Takam has. If they fought now Takam would beat him comfortably. Not sure if he wouldn't always have beaten him.
imo Takam from Povetkin fight was better than Arreola ever was
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46471
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by gilgamesh »

At least Wilder will knock him out this time.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46471
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by gilgamesh »

dagilechia wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Arreola achieved nothing more than Takam has. If they fought now Takam would beat him comfortably. Not sure if he wouldn't always have beaten him.
imo Takam from Povetkin fight was better than Arreola ever was
Every bit as good as Arreola ever was if nothing else.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Arreola always sucked really bad. Takam is clearly better.
dagilechia
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5319
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 08:43

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by dagilechia »

btw if Joshua fights Whyte now, people would say ''again he will knock his fat ass out, mismatch'' if Wilder faces Whyte now ''finally Deontay faces a decent opponent'' - that is the difference of Joshua and Wilder resume :D
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Joshua has the best Heavyweight win since Lewis beat Holyfield. I've never heard anyone claim Wilder should be rated ahead of AJ.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46471
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by gilgamesh »

dagilechia wrote:btw if Joshua fights Whyte now, people would say ''again he will knock his fat ass out, mismatch'' if Wilder faces Whyte now ''finally Deontay faces a decent opponent'' - that is the difference of Joshua and Wilder resume :D
Exactly :TU:

Whyte would be a step back down for AJ. It'd be a significant step up for Wilder.
candyslim
Welterweight
Posts: 5464
Joined: 06 Jun 2016, 06:13

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by candyslim »

klitoris wrote:Since this is a mandatory, Hearn already had a pre-made deal done with Takam incase Pulev pulled out. This way Joshua gets the IBF mandatory done and doesn't have to worry about it again.

For Pulev to pull out on a fake, Hearn would have to pay him basically his purse which is ridiculous.
Agreed. Smart insurance policy by Hearn. I'm not suggesting Pulev wasn't prepared to take his lumps for $4m but he has always seemed strangely unenthusiastic about a Joshua fight. I expect he'll get another chance. Does Takam count as the mandatory now?
Ossyrules
Super Lightweight
Posts: 3050
Joined: 25 Mar 2017, 19:11

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by Ossyrules »

Best Coast wrote:
dagilechia wrote:Takam would be a good opponent, at least it is not someone like shot Arreola
Beg to differ. Arreola is a "has-been"...Takam is a "never-was". :lol:
Takam comes in with 2 weeks till the fight night, I don’t see what more they could have done to save losing thousands preparing for this show.

Allegedly he was on stand by and in the gym. We’ll see what type of shape he’s in soon
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: AJ vs PULEV off ?

Post by Badhusker »

Ossyrules wrote:
Best Coast wrote:
dagilechia wrote:Takam would be a good opponent, at least it is not someone like shot Arreola
Beg to differ. Arreola is a "has-been"...Takam is a "never-was". :lol:
Takam comes in with 2 weeks till the fight night, I don’t see what more they could have done to save losing thousands preparing for this show.

Allegedly he was on stand by and in the gym. We’ll see what type of shape he’s in soon

Pulev never wanted the fight, imo. I read he has turned down a chance to fight Joshua more than once, besides this time. Takam should be in shape, because Hearn said himself he "made a deal" with Takam's team to start camp and be on stand-by. They didn't have to pay Pulev not to fight, I'm guessing they knew he didn't want it in the first place, as he has proved before. Injury? I doubt it.
Post Reply