Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Joshua (c) vs. Takam Winner?

Poll ended at 17 Oct 2017, 16:32

Anthony Joshua
68
84%
Carlos Takam
13
16%
 
Total votes: 81

deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3153
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by deadpan »

Takam should fight Dillian.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by rd350lc »

Can someone explain how the doctor took a really hard look at pulling Takam out in the 9th , but didn't even look at the cuts before the 10th , had they got better over that round ?

Would like to see a rematch of this fight

Guess we'll never see that .
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

Tuan_Jim wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:
What does turn it in mean? What am I to turn in? Instruct.
Stop talking shite.

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.
Very new to boxing? :lol:

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by BitPlayer »

deadpan wrote:Takam should fight Dillian.
I think he'd win.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by BitPlayer »

Covfefe wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
Stop talking shite.

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.
Very new to boxing? :lol:

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
The minority that doesn't think that was a gift stoppage.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Covfefe wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
Stop talking shite.

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.
Very new to boxing? :lol:

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.
Last edited by Tuan_Jim on 28 Oct 2017, 18:29, edited 1 time in total.
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3152
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Grilling Machine »

Deserter wrote:Sure it’s not lost on anybody that by that criteria Joshua would have been stopped by the ref at least twice in the Klit fight. Shocking double standards.
:TU:
jamamb wrote:maybe not bought like suggested, but i do agree with those who say he was looking for it.
Aye, not bought, but clearly influenced by the location.

Unlike most of you, though, I still think that Joshua beats Fury. Fury's power isn't enough to stop Joshua, so he'd have to be in peak fitness to do it on points.
Last edited by Grilling Machine on 28 Oct 2017, 18:30, edited 1 time in total.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

BitPlayer wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.
Very new to boxing? :lol:

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
The minority that doesn't think that was a gift stoppage.
I was the first post to say it was a bad stoppage. It was way too soon, I’m not arguing it wasn’t. Tuan_jim has invented that entirely.
Stuffs
Super Lightweight
Posts: 611
Joined: 29 Jun 2016, 06:28

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Stuffs »

Bad stoppage for so many reasons.

It's the Heavyweight Championship of the World. Takam deserved much better, and had already taken much worse. He was in 'fine' condition to continue.

AJ did land an absolute peach about 30 seconds prior to start the chain of events, but at that point you can see the ref moving in and itching to stop it, which he did after AJ failed to land his next four punches.

Stopped off one punch, which had Takam at worst, slightly wobbled.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by lillywhite14 »

Poor stoppage but that's a bit of bullshit to be fair.

Got the fight at 12 days but wasn't he put on notice 10 weeks ago?

Also, premature stoppage just prevented an 11-1 scorecard in favour of Joshua when he was a touch off colour.

Anyway, it's not like his boy will have any say soon. Tyson needs to come back or they should just stop chatting bollocks
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22330
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Horse »

Covfefe wrote:Paid to look after him. :lol:

Go away horse.
Do you work for the BBBofC?

Stop being such an establishment suck-up.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

Tuan_Jim wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:

You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.

You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.
Very new to boxing? :lol:

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.
I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.

I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon. :lol:

You’re a joke.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

Horse wrote:
Covfefe wrote:Paid to look after him. :lol:

Go away horse.
Do you work for the BBBofC?

Stop being such an establishment suck-up.
:lol:

Get some new material.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27448
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by stujones »

deadpan wrote:Takam should fight Dillian.
Yeah, good fight that one - I think it is perfect for Dillian. I really am concerned now about Dillian's chin / balance, so Takam's lack of power could be good for Dillian. Hard fight to call, but Takam's stock isn't going to be much higher than it is now.
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by dirk2686 »

rd350lc wrote:Can someone explain how the doctor took a really hard look at pulling Takam out in the 9th , but didn't even look at the cuts before the 10th , had they got better over that round ?

Would like to see a rematch of this fight

Guess we'll never see that .
I get people saying it was an early stoppage. But a rematch? Joshua won every round and totally dominated.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32660
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Seemed an early stoppage, but did feel Joshua would have stopped Takam late.

Overall show was garbage, only salvaged by a super fit girl with amazing tits who kept dancing around in the row in front of me.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Covfefe wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
Very new to boxing? :lol:

Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.
I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.

I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon. :lol:

You’re a joke.
Then what the Sam Hill are you arguing?
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8565
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by coneye »

Blind Freddy could see the Tactics were to make AJ work and go for a late stoppage if he tired , Wether or not it would of worked we will never know , because the ref did'nt allow it , But facts are dispite the cut dispite anything and everything , Takam was still in the fight , he was,t hurt , he did'nt actually take many clean punches when he was stopped , it was going to 12 and Aj WAS TIRING ,, anyone with half a brain knows its when your tired you can go , Takam was'nt given the chance , that ref was looking to stop the fight and he done it .. Klitchko had AJ in worse bother , so its double standards british style
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22330
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Horse »

Covfefe wrote: :lol:

Get some new material.
When you stop worshipping the establishment then I'll stop repeating the same stuff.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by jamamb »

i thought takam arguably won a round or two. aj obviously way ahead though. ya, no rematch, but still i hope takam gets a good fight to make up for the bs. he deserved to continue. being the first to take aj the distance wouldve been a significant thing.
Last edited by jamamb on 28 Oct 2017, 18:33, edited 1 time in total.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

Tuan_Jim wrote:
Covfefe wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:
The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.
I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.

I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon. :lol:

You’re a joke.
Then what the Sam Hill are you arguing?
That nothing corrupt happened, which was what you said in the post I replied too before you started making stuff up. Nothing corrupt happened there, it was just a poor stoppage.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

Horse wrote:
Covfefe wrote: :lol:

Get some new material.
When you stop worshipping the establishment then I'll stop repeating the same stuff.
Should I worship you, should I build an effigy to horse in my yard and pray to it?
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by rd350lc »

lillywhite14 wrote:
Poor stoppage but that's a bit of bullshit to be fair.

Got the fight at 12 days but wasn't he put on notice 10 weeks ago?

Also, premature stoppage just prevented an 11-1 scorecard in favour of Joshua when he was a touch off colour.

Anyway, it's not like his boy will have any say soon. Tyson needs to come back or they should just stop chatting bollocks
I'm afraid that's all he is capable of , plus he really enjoys it .
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by BitPlayer »

jamamb wrote:i thought takam arguably won a round or two. aj obviously way ahead though. ya, no rematch, but still i hope takam gets a good fight to make up for the bs. he deserved to continue. being the first to take aj the distance wouldve been a significant thing.
Defenitely.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22983
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017

Post by handsofstone »

I just seen that security guy in the background there, the one who shouted " that's bang out of order" was it during a Bellew/Haye presser?


Either way he's hilarious
Post Reply