Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Takam should fight Dillian.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Can someone explain how the doctor took a really hard look at pulling Takam out in the 9th , but didn't even look at the cuts before the 10th , had they got better over that round ?
Would like to see a rematch of this fight
Guess we'll never see that .
Would like to see a rematch of this fight
Guess we'll never see that .
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Very new to boxing?Tuan_Jim wrote:Covfefe wrote:Stop talking shite.Tuan_Jim wrote:
What does turn it in mean? What am I to turn in? Instruct.
You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.
You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.
Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
I think he'd win.deadpan wrote:Takam should fight Dillian.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
The minority that doesn't think that was a gift stoppage.Covfefe wrote:Very new to boxing?Tuan_Jim wrote:Covfefe wrote:
Stop talking shite.
You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.
You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.![]()
Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.Covfefe wrote:Very new to boxing?Tuan_Jim wrote:Covfefe wrote:
Stop talking shite.
You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.
You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.![]()
Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
Last edited by Tuan_Jim on 28 Oct 2017, 18:29, edited 1 time in total.
-
Grilling Machine
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3152
- Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Deserter wrote:Sure it’s not lost on anybody that by that criteria Joshua would have been stopped by the ref at least twice in the Klit fight. Shocking double standards.
Aye, not bought, but clearly influenced by the location.jamamb wrote:maybe not bought like suggested, but i do agree with those who say he was looking for it.
Unlike most of you, though, I still think that Joshua beats Fury. Fury's power isn't enough to stop Joshua, so he'd have to be in peak fitness to do it on points.
Last edited by Grilling Machine on 28 Oct 2017, 18:30, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
I was the first post to say it was a bad stoppage. It was way too soon, I’m not arguing it wasn’t. Tuan_jim has invented that entirely.BitPlayer wrote:The minority that doesn't think that was a gift stoppage.Covfefe wrote:Very new to boxing?Tuan_Jim wrote:
You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.
You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.![]()
Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Bad stoppage for so many reasons.
It's the Heavyweight Championship of the World. Takam deserved much better, and had already taken much worse. He was in 'fine' condition to continue.
AJ did land an absolute peach about 30 seconds prior to start the chain of events, but at that point you can see the ref moving in and itching to stop it, which he did after AJ failed to land his next four punches.
Stopped off one punch, which had Takam at worst, slightly wobbled.
It's the Heavyweight Championship of the World. Takam deserved much better, and had already taken much worse. He was in 'fine' condition to continue.
AJ did land an absolute peach about 30 seconds prior to start the chain of events, but at that point you can see the ref moving in and itching to stop it, which he did after AJ failed to land his next four punches.
Stopped off one punch, which had Takam at worst, slightly wobbled.
-
lillywhite14
- Heavyweight

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Poor stoppage but that's a bit of bullshit to be fair.wesshaw1985 wrote:https://twitter.com/peterfury/status/924398742312243201
Got the fight at 12 days but wasn't he put on notice 10 weeks ago?
Also, premature stoppage just prevented an 11-1 scorecard in favour of Joshua when he was a touch off colour.
Anyway, it's not like his boy will have any say soon. Tyson needs to come back or they should just stop chatting bollocks
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Do you work for the BBBofC?Covfefe wrote:Paid to look after him.![]()
Go away horse.
Stop being such an establishment suck-up.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.Tuan_Jim wrote:The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.Covfefe wrote:Very new to boxing?Tuan_Jim wrote:
You're in the minority. That was a horrendous stoppage. Takam could have gone 12. We don't just stop fights because one guy's behind.
You're very new to boxing, so hold back before commenting on anyone's posts here.![]()
Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon.
You’re a joke.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Horse wrote:Do you work for the BBBofC?Covfefe wrote:Paid to look after him.![]()
Go away horse.
Stop being such an establishment suck-up.
Get some new material.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Yeah, good fight that one - I think it is perfect for Dillian. I really am concerned now about Dillian's chin / balance, so Takam's lack of power could be good for Dillian. Hard fight to call, but Takam's stock isn't going to be much higher than it is now.deadpan wrote:Takam should fight Dillian.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
I get people saying it was an early stoppage. But a rematch? Joshua won every round and totally dominated.rd350lc wrote:Can someone explain how the doctor took a really hard look at pulling Takam out in the 9th , but didn't even look at the cuts before the 10th , had they got better over that round ?
Would like to see a rematch of this fight
Guess we'll never see that .
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32661
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Seemed an early stoppage, but did feel Joshua would have stopped Takam late.
Overall show was garbage, only salvaged by a super fit girl with amazing tits who kept dancing around in the row in front of me.
Overall show was garbage, only salvaged by a super fit girl with amazing tits who kept dancing around in the row in front of me.
-
Tuan_Jim
- Heavyweight

Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Then what the Sam Hill are you arguing?Covfefe wrote:I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.Tuan_Jim wrote:The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.Covfefe wrote:
Very new to boxing?![]()
Minority? What minority is that smart arse?
I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon.![]()
You’re a joke.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Blind Freddy could see the Tactics were to make AJ work and go for a late stoppage if he tired , Wether or not it would of worked we will never know , because the ref did'nt allow it , But facts are dispite the cut dispite anything and everything , Takam was still in the fight , he was,t hurt , he did'nt actually take many clean punches when he was stopped , it was going to 12 and Aj WAS TIRING ,, anyone with half a brain knows its when your tired you can go , Takam was'nt given the chance , that ref was looking to stop the fight and he done it .. Klitchko had AJ in worse bother , so its double standards british style
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
When you stop worshipping the establishment then I'll stop repeating the same stuff.Covfefe wrote:![]()
Get some new material.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
i thought takam arguably won a round or two. aj obviously way ahead though. ya, no rematch, but still i hope takam gets a good fight to make up for the bs. he deserved to continue. being the first to take aj the distance wouldve been a significant thing.
Last edited by jamamb on 28 Oct 2017, 18:33, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
That nothing corrupt happened, which was what you said in the post I replied too before you started making stuff up. Nothing corrupt happened there, it was just a poor stoppage.Tuan_Jim wrote:Then what the Sam Hill are you arguing?Covfefe wrote:I’ve been posting here for over ten years, and watching boxing for over twenty years.Tuan_Jim wrote:
The minority of one that thinks that was a good stoppage. Again, you obviously haven't watched boxing very long, hence why you're not disgusted by the stoppage, hence why everyone mocks your idiotic contributions.
I haven’t once said the stoppage was good, in fact go back and read the thread, I was the first comment in to say it was too soon.![]()
You’re a joke.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Should I worship you, should I build an effigy to horse in my yard and pray to it?Horse wrote:When you stop worshipping the establishment then I'll stop repeating the same stuff.Covfefe wrote:![]()
Get some new material.
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
I'm afraid that's all he is capable of , plus he really enjoys it .lillywhite14 wrote:Poor stoppage but that's a bit of bullshit to be fair.wesshaw1985 wrote:https://twitter.com/peterfury/status/924398742312243201
Got the fight at 12 days but wasn't he put on notice 10 weeks ago?
Also, premature stoppage just prevented an 11-1 scorecard in favour of Joshua when he was a touch off colour.
Anyway, it's not like his boy will have any say soon. Tyson needs to come back or they should just stop chatting bollocks
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
Defenitely.jamamb wrote:i thought takam arguably won a round or two. aj obviously way ahead though. ya, no rematch, but still i hope takam gets a good fight to make up for the bs. he deserved to continue. being the first to take aj the distance wouldve been a significant thing.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 22984
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: Round-By-Round - Anthony Joshua (c) vs. Carlos Takam - October 28th 2017
I just seen that security guy in the background there, the one who shouted " that's bang out of order" was it during a Bellew/Haye presser?
Either way he's hilarious
Either way he's hilarious