loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
that would have been some crazy fight.
close, edgy, beyond what i can imagine.
close, edgy, beyond what i can imagine.
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
interesting. manny could be wild at lower weights but he had atg physical gifts. super fast hands, ktfo power, and just a tenacious beast. he could still be outboxed though. is loma at the level to do it to him? im not sure. i feelsafer going pac.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
50-50 Loma better boxer, Pac fiercer and heavier puncher..
-
Monte Fisto
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2978
- Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
Tough one. Prime pac had 1 punch KO power.
So loma could not be to offensive open cause a ckean shot could end it all. Both relentless both stamina at the top. At the end vasyl technicly to well rounded, woukd outland manny with his angles vision finding oppenings.
Loma by ud in a close fight
So loma could not be to offensive open cause a ckean shot could end it all. Both relentless both stamina at the top. At the end vasyl technicly to well rounded, woukd outland manny with his angles vision finding oppenings.
Loma by ud in a close fight
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
I don't think that fight ever sees the final bell KO either way..
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
Is Loma consudered in his "prime". I would say no. He also lacks the kind of quality opposition Pacman got to face, his best performances were probably the destructions of Barrera & Morales. It was on nights like those the Pacman wrote himself into greatness. Could Loma have lived with that version of the Pacman? I need to see someone force Loma through the gears. Lomachenko was vicious against Roman Martinez, could he dispatch of a fighter in the vein of Eric Morales in similar fashion? I can't wait to find out - there's more to come from Vasyl.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
Ricky_ wrote: ↑12 Dec 2017, 16:21 Is Loma consudered in his "prime". I would say no. He also lacks the kind of quality opposition Pacman got to face, his best performances were probably the destructions of Barrera & Morales. It was on nights like those the Pacman wrote himself into greatness. Could Loma have lived with that version of the Pacman? I need to see someone force Loma through the gears. Lomachenko was vicious against Roman Martinez, could he dispatch of a fighter in the vein of Eric Morales in similar fashion? I can't wait to find out - there's more to come from Vasyl.
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
yes he does naz was excellent.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
Forget prime for prime. Arum said last year he always wanted to match Pac with Loma. What if they fought at 140? Be a good fight to watch.
-
victor-romeo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1633
- Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
This sounds like very probable fight actually.. maybe at catch weight 138 or something...I think it has a possibility of happening,
-
ClivePatrickLyons
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
Pac in 9 easy 
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
Yes it is possible. Freddie Roach would definitely try to talk him out of it though. He may prefer a fight vs Loma than one vs Crawford. After Crawford beats Horn, Arum will want to line that up. If given that choice, Freddie would want the Loma fight.victor-romeo wrote: ↑12 Dec 2017, 19:02This sounds like very probable fight actually.. maybe at catch weight 138 or something...I think it has a possibility of happening,
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
As far as prime for prime, if there is random testing Loma easy win. No random testing Pac close win.
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
I have to disagree with you here... Pacquiao got knocked out by mediocre opposition when he had 30 fights or so... Barrera got the shitt beat out of him by Amir Khan... You have to actually watch the fight... Morales quit like a coward vs Pac.Ricky_ wrote: ↑12 Dec 2017, 16:21 Is Loma consudered in his "prime". I would say no. He also lacks the kind of quality opposition Pacman got to face, his best performances were probably the destructions of Barrera & Morales. It was on nights like those the Pacman wrote himself into greatness. Could Loma have lived with that version of the Pacman? I need to see someone force Loma through the gears. Lomachenko was vicious against Roman Martinez, could he dispatch of a fighter in the vein of Eric Morales in similar fashion? I can't wait to find out - there's more to come from Vasyl
I don't see anybody that Pacquiao beat on the way up to match the boxing and punching skills of Gary Russell, Nicholas Walters, and Guillermo Rignodeaux who only lost to Lomachenko and are otherwise undefeated... Barrera got cleaned up by Jr Jones twice and Jr was a chinny kid... At one time Morales lost 5 of 6 fights and he looked fkking terrible...
Lomachenko is in his prime right now... Because he's beating the crap out of the best ... and nobody wants to fight him.
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
I think Lomachenko is a special talent.. look at his resume right now its truly impressive. Oh yeah i can wait to see him push to his limit but what if it never happen. Go see the PtBF vs Rigo, a lot of boxrec people had Rigo. About the Walters fight same thing. He just made them quit. I would say he beats prime Pac by decision. If he takes the time and go up in weight gradually he will prove is special if he is rush there it might be harder. I could see him defeating Garcia in a year from now so another 3 fight before Mickey
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
oh no. i hate when boxers i love are
mismatched on their way out. pac
would look very bad in that one and
i would not like that a bit.
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
Loma better boxer, speed equal. Pac was just vicious, so Pacman in a stoppage.
-
Impractical Poster
- Middleweight
- Posts: 7636
- Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
I tend to agree with Badhusker on this one.
I was a huge fan of Manny during his hayday. But, if he was clean, I'd be extremely surprised.
Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?
It's ironic really - the ped accusations only came about when Mayeweather ducked Pacquiao - and then lost a defamation case and paid Pacquiao out of court. But the really irony is Pac never failed a drugs test, but Floyd got busted.Impractical Poster wrote: ↑15 Dec 2017, 20:14I tend to agree with Badhusker on this one.
I was a huge fan of Manny during his hayday. But, if he was clean, I'd be extremely surprised.