loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by man »

that would have been some crazy fight.
close, edgy, beyond what i can imagine.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by jamamb »

interesting. manny could be wild at lower weights but he had atg physical gifts. super fast hands, ktfo power, and just a tenacious beast. he could still be outboxed though. is loma at the level to do it to him? im not sure. i feelsafer going pac.
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1633
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by victor-romeo »

50-50 Loma better boxer, Pac fiercer and heavier puncher..
littlepug
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by littlepug »

man wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 11:32 that would have been some crazy fight.
close, edgy, beyond what i can imagine.
Winner gets Naz :bag:
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Monte Fisto »

Pac
Jip
Super Lightweight
Posts: 2518
Joined: 04 Nov 2016, 03:30

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Jip »

Tough one. Prime pac had 1 punch KO power.
So loma could not be to offensive open cause a ckean shot could end it all. Both relentless both stamina at the top. At the end vasyl technicly to well rounded, woukd outland manny with his angles vision finding oppenings.

Loma by ud in a close fight
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1633
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by victor-romeo »

I don't think that fight ever sees the final bell KO either way..
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Ricky_ »

Is Loma consudered in his "prime". I would say no. He also lacks the kind of quality opposition Pacman got to face, his best performances were probably the destructions of Barrera & Morales. It was on nights like those the Pacman wrote himself into greatness. Could Loma have lived with that version of the Pacman? I need to see someone force Loma through the gears. Lomachenko was vicious against Roman Martinez, could he dispatch of a fighter in the vein of Eric Morales in similar fashion? I can't wait to find out - there's more to come from Vasyl.
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1633
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by victor-romeo »

Ricky_ wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 16:21 Is Loma consudered in his "prime". I would say no. He also lacks the kind of quality opposition Pacman got to face, his best performances were probably the destructions of Barrera & Morales. It was on nights like those the Pacman wrote himself into greatness. Could Loma have lived with that version of the Pacman? I need to see someone force Loma through the gears. Lomachenko was vicious against Roman Martinez, could he dispatch of a fighter in the vein of Eric Morales in similar fashion? I can't wait to find out - there's more to come from Vasyl.
:TU:
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by man »

littlepug wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 14:38
man wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 11:32 that would have been some crazy fight.
close, edgy, beyond what i can imagine.
Winner gets Naz :bag:
naz has no business being in the
ring with either man.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by jamamb »

yes he does naz was excellent.
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1633
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by victor-romeo »

jamamb wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 18:34 yes he does naz was excellent.
Against Kevin Kelly he was, but not against Barrera , I loved the way Barrera got him in a half nelson and slammed his head against the ring post that was A+.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Badhusker »

Forget prime for prime. Arum said last year he always wanted to match Pac with Loma. What if they fought at 140? Be a good fight to watch.
victor-romeo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1633
Joined: 18 Sep 2004, 22:29

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by victor-romeo »

Badhusker wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 18:59 Forget prime for prime. Arum said last year he always wanted to match Pac with Loma. What if they fought at 140? Be a good fight to watch.
This sounds like very probable fight actually.. maybe at catch weight 138 or something...I think it has a possibility of happening,
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Pac in 9 easy :TU:
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Badhusker »

victor-romeo wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 19:02
Badhusker wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 18:59 Forget prime for prime. Arum said last year he always wanted to match Pac with Loma. What if they fought at 140? Be a good fight to watch.
This sounds like very probable fight actually.. maybe at catch weight 138 or something...I think it has a possibility of happening,
Yes it is possible. Freddie Roach would definitely try to talk him out of it though. He may prefer a fight vs Loma than one vs Crawford. After Crawford beats Horn, Arum will want to line that up. If given that choice, Freddie would want the Loma fight.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Badhusker »

As far as prime for prime, if there is random testing Loma easy win. No random testing Pac close win.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Ricky_ »

Badhusker wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 19:28 As far as prime for prime, if there is random testing Loma easy win. No random testing Pac close win.
Classic Brut.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Badhusker »

Ricky_ wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 19:28
Badhusker wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 19:28 As far as prime for prime, if there is random testing Loma easy win. No random testing Pac close win.
Classic Brut.
Sorry to disappoint you, but not Brut. PM any mod and see what they say.
Kalan
Super Middleweight
Posts: 10083
Joined: 23 Sep 2012, 23:22

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Kalan »

Ricky_ wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 16:21 Is Loma consudered in his "prime". I would say no. He also lacks the kind of quality opposition Pacman got to face, his best performances were probably the destructions of Barrera & Morales. It was on nights like those the Pacman wrote himself into greatness. Could Loma have lived with that version of the Pacman? I need to see someone force Loma through the gears. Lomachenko was vicious against Roman Martinez, could he dispatch of a fighter in the vein of Eric Morales in similar fashion? I can't wait to find out - there's more to come from Vasyl
I have to disagree with you here... Pacquiao got knocked out by mediocre opposition when he had 30 fights or so... Barrera got the shitt beat out of him by Amir Khan... You have to actually watch the fight... Morales quit like a coward vs Pac.

I don't see anybody that Pacquiao beat on the way up to match the boxing and punching skills of Gary Russell, Nicholas Walters, and Guillermo Rignodeaux who only lost to Lomachenko and are otherwise undefeated... Barrera got cleaned up by Jr Jones twice and Jr was a chinny kid... At one time Morales lost 5 of 6 fights and he looked fkking terrible...

Lomachenko is in his prime right now... Because he's beating the crap out of the best ... and nobody wants to fight him.
Cloutov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 472
Joined: 07 Apr 2010, 10:21

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Cloutov »

I think Lomachenko is a special talent.. look at his resume right now its truly impressive. Oh yeah i can wait to see him push to his limit but what if it never happen. Go see the PtBF vs Rigo, a lot of boxrec people had Rigo. About the Walters fight same thing. He just made them quit. I would say he beats prime Pac by decision. If he takes the time and go up in weight gradually he will prove is special if he is rush there it might be harder. I could see him defeating Garcia in a year from now so another 3 fight before Mickey
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by man »

Badhusker wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 18:59 Forget prime for prime. Arum said last year he always wanted to match Pac with Loma. What if they fought at 140? Be a good fight to watch.
oh no. i hate when boxers i love are
mismatched on their way out. pac
would look very bad in that one and
i would not like that a bit.
hoagylt
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 291
Joined: 10 Feb 2012, 12:00

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by hoagylt »

Loma better boxer, speed equal. Pac was just vicious, so Pacman in a stoppage.
Impractical Poster
Middleweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Impractical Poster »

Ricky_ wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 19:28
Badhusker wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 19:28 As far as prime for prime, if there is random testing Loma easy win. No random testing Pac close win.
Classic Brut.
I tend to agree with Badhusker on this one.

I was a huge fan of Manny during his hayday. But, if he was clean, I'd be extremely surprised.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: loma - pac, prime for prime, who you got?

Post by Ricky_ »

Impractical Poster wrote: 15 Dec 2017, 20:14
Ricky_ wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 19:28
Badhusker wrote: 12 Dec 2017, 19:28 As far as prime for prime, if there is random testing Loma easy win. No random testing Pac close win.
Classic Brut.
I tend to agree with Badhusker on this one.

I was a huge fan of Manny during his hayday. But, if he was clean, I'd be extremely surprised.
It's ironic really - the ped accusations only came about when Mayeweather ducked Pacquiao - and then lost a defamation case and paid Pacquiao out of court. But the really irony is Pac never failed a drugs test, but Floyd got busted.
Post Reply