Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

diddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 01:42

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by diddy »

120-108. But the judges will find 3 absurd rounds for DL.
Guelwaar
Super Welterweight
Posts: 147
Joined: 11 Feb 2015, 06:20

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Guelwaar »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 00:34 Shouldn’t every BJS fan be a Floyd fan?
If ur willing to watch this level of “boxing”,
then it makes no sense to call Floyd or Hopkins boring.
At least they landed punches of consequence.

BJS style is pure crap and further proof of your hypocritical assessments.
i think a guy of floyd's caliber would have ko'd lemieux...prime hopkins too...bjs not as elite as those guys, but he's still a brilliant fighter.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100682
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

120-108
117-111
118-110

All for Saunders
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Ricky_ »

:zzz:
klitoris
Super Welterweight
Posts: 927
Joined: 29 Sep 2014, 18:16

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by klitoris »

Who the fornicate gave lemieux more than a round
lazboy
Super Lightweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 16 Jun 2016, 21:00

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by lazboy »

Schooled. Could have stopped him I thought with a little more activity/punchers. Dark horse of the division.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100682
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

klitoris wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 01:15 Who the eff gave lemieux more than a round
Desperately.. just desperately Lemieux could be given no more that 3 rounds.

Like I said. Desperately.
closer
Super Welterweight
Posts: 140
Joined: 28 Feb 2015, 12:44

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by closer »

Great performance, but was to be expected from the UK fans who know how talented BJ really is when motivated.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100682
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

He won the fight on the counter throughout. Fought an intelligent fight.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100682
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Pundits calling it Calzaghe-Lacy
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Ricky_ »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 01:26 Pundits calling it Calzaghe-Lacy
Laughable.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by jamamb »

what is going on with bjs and ggg, canelo, and jacobs. which is he most likely to fight.
pizzakid13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 02 May 2009, 22:36

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by pizzakid13 »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 01:26 Pundits calling it Calzaghe-Lacy
Not that bad but very thorough beating.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by jamamb »

far more of an embarrassing outboxing than a beating
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26483
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by KiwiRider »

Thank goodness for the undercard.
Spike! What a great win that was.
And Seldin will have to get better matchmaking in the future, no way can he go up against a stick and mover.
Saunders put on a booxing boo fest. Why he chose to throw so few shots bewilders me, he could have won fans tonight, but instead alienated them.
Neither Canelo or GGG would want to fight him because it would stink the house out.
jamamb
Lightweight
Posts: 14329
Joined: 17 Sep 2017, 05:37

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by jamamb »

spike and lem should fight
bbb636
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 122
Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 14:21

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by bbb636 »

i was there.....gave two round to lemieux...1 by compassion...

was very funny when lemieux miss with a hook and saunders pretending to look at the hook ending up in the crowds(b-hop attidude right there)

my respect to saunders..make me look bad with my prediction..

would love to see him figt jacobs or ggg.

he would beat alvarez easily.
Shambles
Cruiserweight
Posts: 458
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 15:20

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Shambles »

KiwiRider wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 02:17 Thank goodness for the undercard.
Spike! What a great win that was.
And Seldin will have to get better matchmaking in the future, no way can he go up against a stick and mover.
Saunders put on a booxing boo fest. Why he chose to throw so few shots bewilders me, he could have won fans tonight, but instead alienated them.
Neither Canelo or GGG would want to fight him because it would stink the house out.
I think that's incredibly harsh on Saunders. He outboxed an albeit limited Lemieux away from home whilst easily outlanding him. Sure, he could have engaged more but overall I was impressed, as were HBO it seems.

I think the GGG fight will be made for New York after Golovkin beats Canelo. Even if GGG loses he'll probably go for BJS as I think he'll see it as an easy way back to a title.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Ricky_ »

Shambles wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 12:14
KiwiRider wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 02:17 Thank goodness for the undercard.
Spike! What a great win that was.
And Seldin will have to get better matchmaking in the future, no way can he go up against a stick and mover.
Saunders put on a booxing boo fest. Why he chose to throw so few shots bewilders me, he could have won fans tonight, but instead alienated them.
Neither Canelo or GGG would want to fight him because it would stink the house out.
I think that's incredibly harsh on Saunders. He outboxed an albeit limited Lemieux away from home whilst easily outlanding him. Sure, he could have engaged more but overall I was impressed, as were HBO it seems.

I think the GGG fight will be made for New York after Golovkin beats Canelo. Even if GGG loses he'll probably go for BJS as I think he'll see it as an easy way back to a title.
It's not harsh. Saunders is a total stink-out merchant. His title fight vs Lee is by far the most boring world title fight I've ever seen below Cruiserweight. I appreciate he nullified a dangerous puncher last night but as a spectacle it bored me and the entire venue shitless. Why would an established draw like Canelo or GGG want to chase him round the ring when he brings no audience & revenue to the table? Only up & coming middles will want a crack at bjs for his belt. I doubt I'll watch him fight again.
Tanzio
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 12264
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 09:17

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Tanzio »

Can’t stand him as person but BJS deserves respect for his mastery of the art of boxing. I will watch v any top MW, any he will have a chance v all of them.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26483
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by KiwiRider »

Ricky_ wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 12:32
Shambles wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 12:14
KiwiRider wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 02:17 Thank goodness for the undercard.
Spike! What a great win that was.
And Seldin will have to get better matchmaking in the future, no way can he go up against a stick and mover.
Saunders put on a booxing boo fest. Why he chose to throw so few shots bewilders me, he could have won fans tonight, but instead alienated them.
Neither Canelo or GGG would want to fight him because it would stink the house out.
I think that's incredibly harsh on Saunders. He outboxed an albeit limited Lemieux away from home whilst easily outlanding him. Sure, he could have engaged more but overall I was impressed, as were HBO it seems.

I think the GGG fight will be made for New York after Golovkin beats Canelo. Even if GGG loses he'll probably go for BJS as I think he'll see it as an easy way back to a title.
It's not harsh. Saunders is a total stink-out merchant. His title fight vs Lee is by far the most boring world title fight I've ever seen below Cruiserweight. I appreciate he nullified a dangerous puncher last night but as a spectacle it bored me and the entire venue shitless. Why would an established draw like Canelo or GGG want to chase him round the ring when he brings no audience & revenue to the table? Only up & coming middles will want a crack at bjs for his belt. I doubt I'll watch him fight again.
Maybe I was a little harsh. But just like Hughie Fury, they don't have to stink the house out. All it takes is 4-5 more shots per round to lift the stink. Boxing is about engaging.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

KiwiRider wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 02:17 Thank goodness for the undercard.
Spike! What a great win that was.
And Seldin will have to get better matchmaking in the future, no way can he go up against a stick and mover.
Saunders put on a booxing boo fest. Why he chose to throw so few shots bewilders me, he could have won fans tonight, but instead alienated them.
Neither Canelo or GGG would want to fight him because it would stink the house out.
Thank you for even opinion that reflects your general feelings.
Not a biased fan like some people.

However, BJS won so he is entitled to top fight regardless of style.
Heretic
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2046
Joined: 28 Oct 2012, 07:18

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Heretic »

This fight showed how limited Lemieux is as a boxer. Good job from Saunders by sticking to a game plan and boxing to victory.

I don't see Saunders winning against GGG or Canelo. I think even Jacobs would be too much for him.

Well maybe time will tell and we will know someday :box:
pablothunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1155
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 07:38

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by pablothunder »

I wasn't sure what to expect before the fight, but Saunders was brilliant to watch. The way he boxed and boxed, Lemieux completely negated and unable to do a single thing to stop the flow against him.
I tuned in not knowing who was going to be in charge and Saunders boxed so wisely and impressively throughout. Very impressive and enjoyable viewing.
Shambles
Cruiserweight
Posts: 458
Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 15:20

Re: Round-by-Round: Billy Joe Saunders vs. David Lemieux - December 16, 2017

Post by Shambles »

Ricky_ wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 12:32
Shambles wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 12:14
KiwiRider wrote: 17 Dec 2017, 02:17 Thank goodness for the undercard.
Spike! What a great win that was.
And Seldin will have to get better matchmaking in the future, no way can he go up against a stick and mover.
Saunders put on a booxing boo fest. Why he chose to throw so few shots bewilders me, he could have won fans tonight, but instead alienated them.
Neither Canelo or GGG would want to fight him because it would stink the house out.
I think that's incredibly harsh on Saunders. He outboxed an albeit limited Lemieux away from home whilst easily outlanding him. Sure, he could have engaged more but overall I was impressed, as were HBO it seems.

I think the GGG fight will be made for New York after Golovkin beats Canelo. Even if GGG loses he'll probably go for BJS as I think he'll see it as an easy way back to a title.
It's not harsh. Saunders is a total stink-out merchant. His title fight vs Lee is by far the most boring world title fight I've ever seen below Cruiserweight. I appreciate he nullified a dangerous puncher last night but as a spectacle it bored me and the entire venue shitless. Why would an established draw like Canelo or GGG want to chase him round the ring when he brings no audience & revenue to the table? Only up & coming middles will want a crack at bjs for his belt. I doubt I'll watch him fight again.
Fair enough, though I don't think he was as negative as you make out as he clearly out boxed the home favourite - he could have thrown more in order to impress on his North American debut of course.

In terms of Canelo or GGG, surely they won't have to chase him round the ring. If they are top quality, and they are, they should be able to cut off the ring and get to him better than Lemieux was able to, so I don't think either of those fights would be boring.

Also, I don't think audience or ticket sales will mean much - if either fight takes place in the States then Canelo / GGG will sell the the tickets, BJS will just be the opposition.
Post Reply