Jerry Quarry Record Corrections

[ronnyrains]

ALIAS: BELLFLOWER BOMBER -(Even had it on boxing attire) -(NOT Bellflower Belter)

10/18/65 Referee : Sammy Anch, Quarry vs Milton Manley
01/26/69 Referee : Joe Forchione, Quarry vs Aaron Eastling
08/31/73 Referee : Ferd Hernandez, Quarry vs James J. Woody
08/31/83 Referee : Mike Sanchez , Quarry vs Lupe Guerra

Fight date Corrections:
10/18/65 Quarry vs Milton Manley
10/28/65 Quarry vs Al "Tiger" Carter
11/28/66 Quarry vs leslie Borden
11/21/83 Quarry vs James Williams

Fite Scores:
11/19/68 100-93 Quarry (Henry Moreno)
94-91 is an impossible score for a 10 point "Must" system.

[wouter]

Thanks. The Henry Moreno score was reported as 94-91 in wire-reports. What's your source? Also, the date of the James Williams appears to be correct as we have it (Tuesday Nov. 22).

[ronnyrains]

I sent off to San Antonio and Texas Newspapers for their Microfilm of the fight, scores were 100-93, 100-93, 99-91. they had about 5 differant listings, that 94-91 was a misprint (Moreno 100-93)

The Bakersfield fight was Monday Night 11-21-83 , the fight results were on Tuesday 11-22-83, also sent to Bakersfield Californian, they sent the microfilm to Spokane Washington Library ,(inner library loan) were I was Living at the time.

However you are right they listed it 11-22-83 (thats results, not the fite, unless it went past midnite?

[ronnyrains]

10/30/92 Jerry Quarry vs Ron Cranmer
Cranmer
scorecards: Ed Walsh 54-58 | Lionel Garcia 53-60 | John ?? 56-59

[ronnyrains]

Joe Frazier vs Jerry Quarry II
scorecards:
Judge Artie Aidala 3-0-1 Frazier, Judge Jack Gordon 4-0 Frazier, Referee Joe Louis 4-0 Frazier

[Kalan]

94-91 is an impossible score for a 10 point "Must" system.

It's not.... There are many ways judges arrive at very odd scores at times.

Possibly a judge figures Quarry won 6 rounds, but lost 2 rounds 10-8.... And Earls won 4 rounds, but lost 3 rounds 10-8

[ronnyrains]

I wished i'd saved the newspaper clipping, I did the research, and write them down in my own record book, it was Leonard Zuniga 100-93, Henry Moreno 100-93, Eddie Lopez 99-91. they were sent from a very good librarian from their newspaper microfilm San Antonio. Again who scores what,

94-91 is impossible for a 10 point "must" Svstem. If Quarry would have won 6 rounds to two, its 98-94.

(without say their were no 2 point 10-8 rounds) there were no 10-8 rounds period, what you said, 10-8 city, would have envolved a Lyle-Foreman fracas, there were no knockdowns for either fighter, or blow out rounds.

[ronnyrains]

I wished i'd saved the newspaper clipping, I did the research, and write them down in my own record book, it was Leonard Zuniga 100-93, Henry Moreno 100-93, Eddie Lopez 99-91. they were sent from a very good librarian from their newspaper microfilm San Antonio. Again who scores what,

94-91 is impossible for a 10 point "must" Svstem. If Quarry would have won 6 rounds to two, its 98-94.

(without say their were no 2 point 10-8 rounds) there were no 10-8 rounds period, what you said, 10-8 city, would have envolved a Lyle-Foreman fracas, there were no knockdowns for either fighter, or blow out rounds.

If Quarry had (3) 10-8 rounds, and Earls (2). and no knockdowns?? People would still be talking about it.
I would bet they Alamo this did not happen.
SHOW ME A PRO FIGHT, 10 POINT MUST SYSTEM, where this happend?- 94-91, 10 round score.

[ronnyrains]

06/03/65 Jerry Quarry KO VICTORY OVER JOHN HENRY JACKSON time 1:06

[ronnyrains]

I sent a fax today the boxing NEWPAPER clipping (June 3, 1965 FIGHT) Jerry Quarry KO 4 John Henry Jackson time KO 1:06
(Might have been ruled a TKO)

[ronnyrains]

Jerry Quarry Corrections updates

Jun 3, 1965 John Henry Jackson KO 4 (Time 1:06)
Oct 28, 1967 Floyd Patterson (Wheigh In: -Quarry 193 Lb, Patterson 195 lb
Note: They weighed in again the day of the fight, for both camps, said original weigh in was faulty

Nov 10, 1968 Quarry 203 1/2, Moreno fite card 100-93, there is no 94-91, and i'd like to see another bout that has!!
10-8's for both fighters? (Never happend!)

[ronnyrains]

March 24, 1975
Jerry Quarry (# 5 Ring Magazine) vs Ken Norton (# 4 Ring Magazine)

FIGHT SCORES:
Judge: Jack Gordon Even 2-2 QNQN
Judge: Bill Recht (Norton) 2-1-1 NEQN
Referee: Tony Lobianco Even 2-2 NQQN

-New York Daily News
March 25, 1975

[ronnyrains]

I wished i'd saved the newspaper clipping, I did the research, and write them down in my own record book, it was Leonard Zuniga 100-93, Henry Moreno 100-93, Eddie Lopez 99-91. they were sent from a very good librarian from their newspaper microfilm San Antonio. Again who scores what,

94-91 is impossible for a 10 point "must" Svstem. If Quarry would have won 6 rounds to two, its 98-94.

(without say their were no 2 point 10-8 rounds) there were no 10-8 rounds period, what you said, 10-8 city, would have envolved a Lyle-Foreman fracas, there were no knockdowns for either fighter, or blow out rounds.

If Quarry had (3) 10-8 rounds, and Earls (2). and no knockdowns?? People would still be talking about it.
I would bet they Alamo this did not happen.
SHOW ME A PRO FIGHT, 10 POINT MUST SYSTEM, where this happend?- 94-91, 10 round score.

OKAY ITS OCTOBER 10, 2O19
I'VE FAXED 4 PAGES To BOXING REC
JERRY QUARRY VS Willis Earls
i've found the Clippings and the scores San Antonio papers 11/20/68

Leonard Zuniga (Referee)---------- 100-93 Quarry
Henry Moreno (Judge) ---------- 100-93 Quarry
Eddie Lopez (Judge) ------------99-91 Quarry

please apply the change to Quarry's record, it was a lot of work.

[John]

If Quarry had (3) 10-8 rounds, and Earls (2). and no knockdowns?? People would still be talking about it.
I would bet they Alamo this did not happen.
SHOW ME A PRO FIGHT, 10 POINT MUST SYSTEM, where this happend?- 94-91, 10 round score.

OKAY ITS OCTOBER 10, 2O19
I'VE FAXED 4 PAGES To BOXING REC
JERRY QUARRY VS Willis Earls
i've found the Clippings and the scores San Antonio papers 11/20/68

Leonard Zuniga (Referee)---------- 100-93 Quarry
Henry Moreno (Judge) ---------- 100-93 Quarry
Eddie Lopez (Judge) ------------99-91 Quarry

please apply the change to Quarry's record, it was a lot of work.

We don't have a FAX ?????

[ronnyrains]

OKAY I WENT BY THE FAX NUMBER, PLEASE GIMMIE IT AGAIN

[John]

But we don't have a FAX number, you can email [email protected].