I don't think any fan would demand that, but the fighters that do go beyond what is expected of them are rightly given the utmost respect
is "quitting" the same as "losing"?
Re: is "quitting" the same as "losing"?
Re: is "quitting" the same as "losing"?
90% of the people on this very boardlittlepug wrote: ↑05 Jan 2018, 16:04I don't think any fan would demand that, but the fighters that do go beyond what is expected of them are rightly given the utmost respect
demand exactly this very thing.
Re: is "quitting" the same as "losing"?
The ref and the timekeeper disagree with you.
Re: is "quitting" the same as "losing"?
i haven't checked that. my guess is
they would say something along the
lines of "the count was longer than
ten seconds", which you would see
as proving your point, while i would
say this is totally in line with the rules
of boxing.
Re: is "quitting" the same as "losing"?
the count being longer than 10 seconds is not in line with the rules of boxing....that's why they have a timekeeper.
Re: is "quitting" the same as "losing"?
"In the event of any knockdown, the timekeepers count will cease when picked up by the referee whose count shall prevail and be relied on by the boxers."
4.4. here:
http://www.worldboxingfederation.net/wb ... ations.htm
4.4. here:
http://www.worldboxingfederation.net/wb ... ations.htm
Re: is "quitting" the same as "losing"?
what's a world boxing federation?man wrote: ↑09 Jan 2018, 14:17 "In the event of any knockdown, the timekeepers count will cease when picked up by the referee whose count shall prevail and be relied on by the boxers."
4.4. here:
http://www.worldboxingfederation.net/wb ... ations.htm