i will say that mesis ko blitz of davvaryl williamson was brutal and explosive. only a 90 second watch if your pressed for time. messi was a fun fighter but the barret fight showed his limitations and then of course jirov gave him a brain bleed. actually its very remarkable that he managed to last the distance against jirov because he was totally out of it.
boxers who looked more effective than that are / were.
Re: boxers who looked more effective than that are / were.
Last edited by jamamb on 09 Feb 2018, 18:04, edited 1 time in total.
-
tiny_acres
- Middleweight
- Posts: 9532
- Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43
Re: boxers who looked more effective than that are / were.
Man was I on the Guinn bandwagon.Syntax Error wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 15:26 Dominick Guinn - Looked great & looked like he was going to be the man to fill the void left by Lennox Lewis, but alas not.
Never felt so wrong after.
Re: boxers who looked more effective than that are / were.
i still believe that guinns problems were more in motivation and mindset. his skill was pretty solid and he had a pretty good combo of speed and power. i think he couldve at least been an eddie contending type if motivated. but with his mentality its not surprise at all that he eventually became a cover up and do nothing, give em rounds journeyman
actually guinn is a good contrast with tony thompson, who seemed far less gifted but still beat him. thomas was mentioned in this threads sister (more effective then they look)
actually guinn is a good contrast with tony thompson, who seemed far less gifted but still beat him. thomas was mentioned in this threads sister (more effective then they look)
-
pablothunder
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1155
- Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 07:38
Re: boxers who looked more effective than that are / were.
I just threw 15 years worth of the ring magazine in the skip the other day.BitPlayer wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 16:47Every time he's mentioned I think its a legal requirement to post thisSyntax Error wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 15:26 Dominick Guinn - Looked great & looked like he was going to be the man to fill the void left by Lennox Lewis, but alas not.
![]()
And 20 years of Boxing News...
Was kind of sad, but they really were just taking up space.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9025
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: boxers who looked more effective than that are / were.
Me too.tiny_acres wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 18:03Man was I on the Guinn bandwagon.Syntax Error wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 15:26 Dominick Guinn - Looked great & looked like he was going to be the man to fill the void left by Lennox Lewis, but alas not.
Never felt so wrong after.
I used to tell my two best mates, who are not aficionados of the sport, but will watch the big fights like most lay people, that Guinn was going to be the next great HW in that period after Lewis retired.
How wrong I was.
Re: boxers who looked more effective than that are / were.
He'd be my first pick, every fight he has, he'll have a "wow" spell - just ducking punches and effortlessly countering. He looks so smooth and accurate. He's huge-at-the-weight, awkward, rangy and has a good chin - I just can't fathom why he's never gone beyond British level.Counter-puncher wrote: ↑06 Feb 2018, 16:30 Good thread. Brings to mind the phrase 'flatters to deceive', what fighters flatter/flatter to deceive?
Tyrone Nurse?
Gavin
Going back
Alex Arthur looked to have all the tools but underperformed with them
Umm.
There's some..., sort of 'oomph' desire, spite, workrate missing, he eases off, fights down to his opponent's level, switches off - whatever it is, he just can't seem to put his obvious talents together.
Frankie Gavin is another one - but at least we can see why he flatters to deceive - with Nurse it's a mystery.
Re: boxers who looked more effective than that are / were.
tbh ive never thought of nurse as being good defensively and he does seem to lack power. hes a guy who with the way he carries himself its easy to lump him into the slick category if you have just a quick look, but imo hes actually not. a bit upright and easy to hit at times tbh.