Eubank was 76k which is roughly 11.9 so can't see how Groves would be less than that,maybe they made a mistake reading the weights out.
Eubank v Groves
-
CasualQuaker
- Lightweight
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 30 Dec 2017, 06:36
Re: Eubank v Groves
Groves always looks Gaunt at the weigh in. He will probably be about a stone heavier than Eubank tomorrow night.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13360
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Eubank v Groves
He weighed in 0.4lbs lighter than Eubank so I wouldn't say that's out of the question. You can see Groves has a hell of a lot of weight he can put back on by tomorrow evening.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Eubank v Groves
People keep saying Groves is a big supermiddle,i would of thought he'd be 12 stone at the weighin.jameswilson wrote: ↑16 Feb 2018, 13:00He weighed in 0.4lbs lighter than Eubank so I wouldn't say that's out of the question. You can see Groves has a hell of a lot of weight he can put back on by tomorrow evening.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Eubank v Groves
Eubank weighed 11st 13lbs 90z IE just under 168lbs. which is actually 74.6 kilos roughly
76 kilos would be over the supermiddleweight limit (171lbs)
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Eubank v Groves
He definitely said 76k for EubankCounter-puncher wrote: ↑16 Feb 2018, 13:18Eubank weighed 11st 13lbs 90z IE just under 168lbs. which is actually 74.6 kilos roughly
76 kilos would be over the supermiddleweight limit (171lbs)
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Eubank v Groves
i got my maths wrong this timebigjack wrote: ↑16 Feb 2018, 13:22He definitely said 76k for EubankCounter-puncher wrote: ↑16 Feb 2018, 13:18Eubank weighed 11st 13lbs 90z IE just under 168lbs. which is actually 74.6 kilos roughly
76 kilos would be over the supermiddleweight limit (171lbs)
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Eubank v Groves
Using the converters online,76 kilos is 11st 13.8Counter-puncher wrote: ↑16 Feb 2018, 13:23i got my maths wrong this timebigjack wrote: ↑16 Feb 2018, 13:22He definitely said 76k for EubankCounter-puncher wrote: ↑16 Feb 2018, 13:18
Eubank weighed 11st 13lbs 90z IE just under 168lbs. which is actually 74.6 kilos roughly
76 kilos would be over the supermiddleweight limit (171lbs)![]()
![]()
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16751
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Eubank v Groves
I was right for a change.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑08 Feb 2018, 07:19 For me, this fight will be won and lost one thing.....
Can Groves control the pace of the fight?
If he can't he's going to get knocked out. If he can, then I think he'll win a clear decision.
Re: Eubank v Groves
he even got clowned a bit in the 12th by a one armed grovesTheLeprechaun wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 16:25Obviously im basing it off talent and the "eye test". He's definitely world class already, I don't think that can be denied. He's probably the best son of a world champ that's boxed actually. Degale was elite and I remember saying I thought he was going to be elite and got a similar reply.jimcook wrote: ↑09 Feb 2018, 12:54 elite? like ggg 400 amatuer wins and unbeaten as a pro.
elite ? like mayweather world champ at 22 , 5 weight champ, 50 wins not out
elite? like andre ward, unbeaten since he was 13 years old.
eubank jr is 28 years old , and has fought precisely 1 top fighter. he is gonny have to go some to become even world level, never mind elite.